I suppose that one of the points I have been trying to make from my previous posts is that this was determined and published in draft and then final format in the public domain a long time ago and supposedly with our consultation.
It is a shame we have only just found our voices to speak up. Any actions now are going to have to consider this and demonstrate why we have waited all this time before acting.
How many of you where sailing back in 2008, where aware of these original workshops, draft plans, members of Seabreeze, SV or KBV???
I am extremely frustrated with this, as are you all, but from the perspective that I was at some of the original Parks Vic meetings but at the time when we needed action there was almost total disinterest from the broader windsurfing and kiteboarding community.
Smithy in 2008 the then committee of WV where aware of the consultation process going on. The information I was given on the discussion had by WV at the time was that if "Windsurfers behaved themselves they could fly under the radar and it would not be an issue".
Smithy in 2008 the then committee of WV where aware of the consultation process going on. The information I was given on the discussion at the time was that if "Windsurfers behaved themselves they could fly under the radar and it would not be an issue".
How bazaar when you look at the agenda from my previous post that clearly show that both kites and sailboards were the focus.
Sorry Smithy I have edited my comments to make it a little less confusing
Probably more confusing, at the 2 workshops I attended, which by the way were facilitated by a private consulting firm, there was no inference that would be the case. It sounds more like the opinion of an individual and not that of Parks Vic.
Please don't get me wrong I am as passionate about this issue as everyone else is (now) just frustrated that when I was attending meetings in 2008 representing the interests of KBV officially and sailboarders unofficially, I still do both, the silence from the masses of both sports was deafening. When action was really needed with the best chance of driving change only a handful of people were there.
The funny thing is I remember sitting in the workshop at Carrum and the rep from the jet ski assoc was sitting back in his seat with a big grin on his face basking in the fact that the focus was on someone else for a change...
Edit, sorry just noticed how confused and frustrated my avatar is...
Hey guys I just wanted to share this info about the changes that was posted on the Kite boarding forums by Robinb.
Hi everyone. I have rung Parks about this and they tell me that the prime mover on this Swimming Only zone was Bayside Council. You might want to put some pressure on the three local councillors for the area: ffrederico@bayside.vic.gov.au blowe@bayside.vic.gov.au jlong@bayside.vic.gov.au. The Director City Strategy is swickramasinghe@bayside.vic.gov.au
Please write and express your thoughts: one response has been that it must have been an executive decision not involving the councillors: my answer to that, is that Council should then mandate a change of policy to the executive.
PS Parks say that SUP boards are OK under the new rules, but kayaks are forbidden. Blowed if I can work out the logic of that!
Robinb has typed up an e-mail he has sent to them on our forums if you wanna have a look.
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Kitesurfing/Victoria/No-boating-zones-Hampton/
Interesting insight that Bayside council a culprit. There might be your answer on why SUPs are exempt (not that i want them included). Councillor Frederico is a mad keen SUPer. Gee, i thought they were meant to represent broader interest, not just her own!
Yep...
I have to agree with Smithy in terms of the fact that this info has been around for a long time....and that 3 years ago there weren't many voices arching up...this stuff has been legislated, gazetted in a notice to mariners, and printed and released. Any changes will mean that it has to go through those processes again and someone somewhere will have to foot the bill.
It may or may not be relevant, but we have been through the process.
In our case, in 2009-2010 there was a strong proposal to ban jetskis on Anderson Inlet. On investigation, we became aware that the law didn't distinguish between types of vessels ( eg jetskis, motor boats, windsurfer, kayaks, SUPs) and so therefore, a ban on jetskis would also mean a ban on windsurfing.
As a committee, we developed a strategy with the following key points:
1) We had a 30 year history of windsurfing on the Inlet
2) We had rate paying residents who not only windsurfed, but had moved to live and work in the local community
2) We had an impeccable record in terms of injury/ accidents (2 recorded incidents in 30 years)
3) Our sport was predominantly "invisible" to most of the public- we were really only on the beach when no one else is around, and finally
(and critically)
4) Members of our club were experienced water users and as part of membership complied with our Code of Conduct relating to respect for other water users.
These points were drummed home through a local media strategy, as well as face to face meeting with key stake holders.
After 2 years of discussions with Gippsland Ports, we were able to have the Anderson Inlet Vessel Operating Zone Regulations (VOZR) changed to recognise and accomodate windsurfing. Not an easy process by any stretch, but we had the support of the local yacht club, the angling club, surf life saving and most importantly, the local business association and a recognised state sporting association- in this case-Yachting Vic.
During the discussion, we requested a marker be moved at Area 45 so we could continue to sail the mud banks. The price G Ports quoted was over 10k for a mark with channel lighting, and about 5k for a fixed pylon marker. We had worked hard to develop a strong relationship with Gippsland Ports, and they generously offered to include the marker re positioning in their maintenance schedule.
^ Great outcome Drift and obviously a long struggle for a very localised and specific area.
The stupidity of the implementation is highlighted by my local beach at Gnotuk St. Aspendale. The no boating marker poles have been in place for longer than I can remember, well over 20 years. So in the middle of summer when the beach was actually full of swimmers, these were removed for about 2 weeks only to be reinstated about 20 meters north of the original location.... At 5k each for the new and the cost to remove the original...
Interesting discussion. I have been windsurfing for about 30 years, but I was in a lay off period in 2008. I only discovered Seabreeze about 2 years ago. If I had been active back then and known about it, I would have kicked up a stink.
I've got to say, I wonder what difference we can make now. There aren't many of us windsurfers relative to kite surfers. They seem to have got what they wanted. Why are they going to listen to us now when the 'consultation' was held in 2008?
Smithy in 2008 the then committee of WV where aware of the consultation process going on. The information I was given on the discussion had by WV at the time was that if "Windsurfers behaved themselves they could fly under the radar and it would not be an issue".
hmm... if this was the discussion that I was at, that wasn't what was said. If I remember correctly (it was a while ago) there was also some "... in the short term.." and "... in the long term..." discussions... in particular, there was the point of 'we hope to fly under the radar but will probably prove unlikely'.
Another windsurfer pinged Friday night at Dendy St.
We need to be hearing this through an official channel
Stephen, are you getting reports from the water police on these fines?
Another windsurfer pinged Friday night at Dendy St.
Doug, who was it? I'd be keen to have a chat to them and find out what the police had to say.
Just saw a policeman photographing windsurfers and kites at St Kilda (at Langridge St). Based on the wind direction everyone is in the swimming only zone. Mind you no one is swimming as it's 20 knots +
Unsure of name - told by a third party. Word was police waited for an hour for the guy to come in as he was consistently sailing into the non swimming zone and back out again
Managed to break my boom today several hundred metres off Elwood. After swimming for about 20 minutes, the boys at Elwood LSC must have taken pity on me and came out in their zodiac to give me a hand. Back on the beach I took the opportunity to have a chat to several of the guys about the new swimming zone. Turns out they are about as happy as we are. They were never consulted about the size of the new swimming zone and admitted they are unable to adequately monitor the entire area. They would be more than happy to have the poles moved, or as suggested by someone at the meeting on Wed, a new pair of markers within the existing poles that would mark the perimeter of a smaller ?swimming only? area. If we work closely with these guys, I?m sure we?ll have a much higher chance of actually getting something done here.
Afterwards, I was sitting on the beach (watching all the non-broken boom b@stards enjoying their sailing) noting quite a few individuals sailing deep into the swimming zone. Given we may be working very closely with the Elwood LSC on this issue, I would suggest everyone do their best to keep out of the swimming zone. Not going to help if we p!ss them off.
Surf Life Saving Victoria were part of the 2008 workshops. The clubbies are not expected patrol the entire no boating areas but still just required to put their flags out for the patrolled area as they always have. Just as those do where there have been existing no boating poles.
Threads like this become a pain in the arse, people who haven't followed it from the start either just read the start then add their post at the end or jump to the end. Half the relevant information included is just getting lost.
Surf Life Saving Victoria were part of the 2008 workshops. The clubbies are not expected patrol the entire no boating areas but still just required to put their flags out for the patrolled area as they always have. Just as those do where there have been existing no boating poles.
Threads like this become a pain in the arse, people who haven't followed it from the start either just read the start then add their post at the end or jump to the end.trHalf the relevant information included is just getting lost.
Were you even at the meeting?? One of the main courses of action decided was to approach the life saving clubs and gauge their attitude. I did that today and thought others would be interested. I don't give a crap whether they were at the 2008 workshops. We're trying to formulate a course of action that will improve the very poor situation we find ourselves in now. Dwelling on who was or who wasn't at a meeting six years ago will not achieve that.
Surf Life Saving Victoria were part of the 2008 workshops. The clubbies are not expected patrol the entire no boating areas but still just required to put their flags out for the patrolled area as they always have. Just as those do where there have been existing no boating poles.
Threads like this become a pain in the arse, people who haven't followed it from the start either just read the start then add their post at the end or jump to the end. Half the relevant information included is just getting lost.
Hi Smithy
I think it's interesting. Surf lifesaving is such a large organisation and we already know the consultation wasn't perfect.
If the grass roots parts of lifesaving are feeling uninvolved then we have a great opportunity.
Anyone know who is calling the police? This will be our lead into what people we need to engage and educate.
Managed to break my boom today several hundred metres off Elwood. After swimming for about 20 minutes, the boys at Elwood LSC must have taken pity on me and came out in their zodiac to give me a hand. Back on the beach I took the opportunity to have a chat to several of the guys about the new swimming zone. Turns out they are about as happy as we are. They were never consulted about the size of the new swimming zone and admitted they are unable to adequately monitor the entire area. They would be more than happy to have the poles moved, or as suggested by someone at the meeting on Wed, a new pair of markers within the existing poles that would mark the perimeter of a smaller ?swimming only? area. If we work closely with these guys, I?m sure we?ll have a much higher chance of actually getting something done here.
I think we should take this as a REALLY positive sign. The chances of getting change in these situations after the event, if other users like ELSC were pushing for the changes, are slim. But the fact that they're unhappy about it too - it's fantastic. A combined approach from two user groups rather than just us windsurfers is always going to carry more weight.
Kitz92 - did you catch any names. I think you mentioned one of them was the ELSC treasurer, right?
Good luck everyone
I hope your efforts are well rewarded and windsurfing within the bay can not only continue but thrive.
Keep up the great work!!!!
Interesting article:
www.heraldsun.com.au/nocookies?a=A.flavipes
See they are very active and passionate for the area.... Need to approach these guys and open a dialogue in a respectful manner.
Some contacts:
www.icebergers.com
brightonbathshealthclub.com.au/about-us/icebergers/
middlebrightonbaths.com.au/icebergers/
I don't want to sound preachy - but how we respond this is very important, I know many of us (all of us likely) are pretty upset, and we need to channel that into usable energy to get things going, and be careful, considering our comments are online, and respectful as more details come to light on any different opinions other water groups may have on us.........
Managed to break my boom today several hundred metres off Elwood. After swimming for about 20 minutes, the boys at Elwood LSC must have taken pity on me and came out in their zodiac to give me a hand. Back on the beach I took the opportunity to have a chat to several of the guys about the new swimming zone. Turns out they are about as happy as we are. They were never consulted about the size of the new swimming zone and admitted they are unable to adequately monitor the entire area. They would be more than happy to have the poles moved, or as suggested by someone at the meeting on Wed, a new pair of markers within the existing poles that would mark the perimeter of a smaller ?swimming only? area. If we work closely with these guys, I?m sure we?ll have a much higher chance of actually getting something done here.
I think we should take this as a REALLY positive sign. The chances of getting change in these situations after the event, if other users like ELSC were pushing for the changes, are slim. But the fact that they're unhappy about it too - it's fantastic. A combined approach from two user groups rather than just us windsurfers is always going to carry more weight.
Kitz92 - did you catch any names. I think you mentioned one of them was the ELSC treasurer, right?
Tristan, didn't get the names of the guys I talked to but they did give me the name of the club president who they suggested we contact:
David Rylance
Mobile: 0418 533 824
drylance@live.com.au
Be careful with names, emails and numbers on here. Mps and councillors different but this is a private individual.
He'll be getting so much spam that he won't have time to talk to us....
Just an idea to bring all this information together, how would everyone feel about using google groups - private of course? It would allow tasks to be noted, allocated, status updates, uploading of pics and files..... much better than using this topic, which is not private.....
Thoughts?
Be careful with names, emails and numbers on here. Mps and councillors different but this is a private individual.
He'll be getting so much spam that he won't have time to talk to us....
This info is freely available to all on the ELSC website via the "Contact Us" link.
Surf Life Saving Victoria were part of the 2008 workshops. The clubbies are not expected patrol the entire no boating areas but still just required to put their flags out for the patrolled area as they always have. Just as those do where there have been existing no boating poles.
Threads like this become a pain in the arse, people who haven't followed it from the start either just read the start then add their post at the end or jump to the end.trHalf the relevant information included is just getting lost.
Were you even at the meeting?? One of the main courses of action decided was to approach the life saving clubs and gauge their attitude. I did that today and thought others would be interested. I don't give a crap whether they were at the 2008 workshops. We're trying to formulate a course of action that will improve the very poor situation we find ourselves in now. Dwelling on who was or who wasn't at a meeting six years ago will not achieve that.
No I wasn't at the meeting last week. Did anyone take minutes that can be distributed? maybe if all the agreed actions where posted here with the people who are responsible and dates etc. other people may have a better idea.
If you think not caring about what happened in the past and how we arrived where we are now is the way then good luck, but your chances of success will be greatly reduced.
This issue requires a structured approach that deals with the decision makers of the various stake holders. For example You need to meet with the club captions and have a proper discussion on behalf of a sailboarding organisation and not just rely on a casual conversation with a clubby on the beach. These meeting should be then followed up with written correspondence thanking them for their involvement and support etc. you will need to be able to table this type of thing down the track.
I was working on this issue at the workshop meetings back in 2008 when the majority had the "it'll be right mate" attitude. Having seen how the system works I am offering my insights to help achieve the desired outcomes now. If everyone is not interested in my opinions or help then vote with your thumbs. I will not be offended.
That's right Smithy - a structured and unified approach is the right way forward, hence why I'm trying to get the volunteers all on google groups. There, we can table the approach, have all the members able to view and add their bits, and set about a working group in a coordinated manner.
Rather than lengthy emails to and from over this, an online format will speed things up and allow for great discussion and action. Unfortunately, I don't think these forums are suitable for this as we need to be able to upload and share documents in a private manner.
As this needs to be a club approach, and club represented, just waiting on WV's approval to do so. I have emailed them to see what they think.
PS - I was reading the kite forums discussions about how the windsurfers are organized and doing something about this - lets prove them right!