Select to expand quoteelbows said..
I just read a book about the Viking era 1100 years ago , all the archaeological digs are 2 meters above current sea level because that's where the sea level was a thousand years ago , ten thousand years ago you could walk to Tasmania or Papua .
The world is an amazing place
The enviro-nazis of the green religion will tell us that only humans can change the environment, but they are too narrow-minded to learn
The sea was 120 metres lower 100,000 years ago at the last ice age, it rose very quickly at a much faster rate than it is rising now, to the level it is now about 5000 years ago.
There has been some oscillation of the sea level high stand, each place is different, but the mostly likely reason the Viking locations are 2 metres above sea level today is uplift of the land.
Science and geology are far more complex and interesting than the one dimensional 'human-induced climate change religous zealots' would have us believe.
Select to expand quoteTonyAbbott said..elbows said..
I just read a book about the Viking era 1100 years ago , all the archaeological digs are 2 meters above current sea level because that's where the sea level was a thousand years ago , ten thousand years ago you could walk to Tasmania or Papua .
The world is an amazing place
The enviro-nazis of the green religion will tell us that only humans can change the environment, but they are too narrow-minded to learn
The sea was 120 metres lower 100,000 years ago at the last ice age, it rose very quickly at a much faster rate than it is rising now, to the level it is now about 5000 years ago.
There has been some oscillation of the sea level high stand, each place is different, but the mostly likely reason the Viking locations are 2 metres above sea level today is uplift of the land.
Science and geology are far more complex and interesting than the one dimensional 'human-induced climate change religous zealots' would have us believe.
BS enviros and greenies would not say only humans can change the environment, they would say that humans are obviously changing the environment in this instance.
Core samples of the past show the atmosphere has naturally been through radical changes regarding climate, the difference with the present climate change is the speed it's happening and the cause - human activity since the industrial revolution. dur
Nah, nothing unusual about the changing climate
Global Temps are only slightly increasing after a 18 year hiatus and there is nothing unusual about it
And sea level rises are not unusual
Nothing unusual about the rate either
Do you think there are any natural causes to the current climate change or all just human induced?
The whole process is natural because humans have unnaturally flooded the atmosphere with pollution.
Select to expand quoteTonyAbbott said..
Nah, nothing unusual about the changing climate
Global Temps are only slightly increasing after a 18 year hiatus and there is nothing unusual about it
And sea level rises are not unusual
Nothing unusual about the rate either
Do you think there are any natural causes to the current climate change or all just human induced?
quality trollage Tone.
Human caused 'climate change' has become a new religion,such is their absolute belief in their 'facts'.
The sun as a factor in any 'claimed' increase in temperature should not be entertained.
To entertain such a possibility these days - it would be called a conspiracy theory,a term coined by the Powers That Be to mock those who oppose them.
Peter, I don't think anyone is denying that other factors can and do change the climate; solar and volcanic activity among them, but we have no control over those. The cause of climate-change that we may be able to control is human-induced climate change.
To say that we may be able to control this aspect doesn't mean we ever will of course, that is proving extremely difficult.
Select to expand quoteTonyAbbott said..
A bit of warming will be good for the planet and humanity
PM troll 
Select to expand quoteTonyAbbott said..
A bit of warming will be good for the planet and humanity
Good thinking T that's the way to right the wrongs ! Allow some global warming , that will mean we will burn less fuel to keep warm ..... Problem will be fixed. ............ Oh hang on we may need to use more energy to keep cool ! Doh !
Three former skeptic scientists wake up...
www.abc.net.au/news/science/2017-10-25/climate-change-sceptics-converted/9053406
The media or should I say their media slant the discussion to indoctrinate the masses in to believing their science.
You will rarely read stories going the other way,but that's coincidence not con right Bono 
You know full well the establishment are a bunch of liars,yet there's still trust there for you?
Select to expand quoteTonyAbbott said..
A bit of warming will be good for the planet and humanity
Said with the confidence of a coal lobby bigot.
Select to expand quotequikdrawMcgraw said..
Adriano and pm33 are the same troll
Ahh to be sure cocksure to be sure.....
Well just look at Venus if you're still in denial about greenhouse gas. There's so much of that odourless, invisible gas, you'd be crushed to the size of a tennis ball just standing on the surface and then morph into a cinder a few seconds later.
Harmless really.
There's the evidence that higher concentrations of carbon dioxide, which is a plant food after all, is actually greening the planet and helping to lift agricultural yields
Select to expand quoteAdriano said..
Well just look at Venus if you're still in denial about greenhouse gas. There's so much of that odourless, invisible gas, you'd be crushed to the size of a tennis ball just standing on the surface and then morph into a cinder a few seconds later.
Harmless really.
Earths atmosphere 0.0004% co2, of which only 3% is from humans, which equates to 0.000012% of earths atmosphere!
Venus is 96% co2
Do you think comparing earth to venus it is a tad alarmist?
Don't worry everybody - global warming is solved; New Zealand is going carbon Neutral 
Select to expand quoteAdriano said..
Well just look at Venus
Better than looking at Uranus
Select to expand quoteTonyAbbott said..Adriano said..
Well just look at Venus if you're still in denial about greenhouse gas. There's so much of that odourless, invisible gas, you'd be crushed to the size of a tennis ball just standing on the surface and then morph into a cinder a few seconds later.
Harmless really.
Earths atmosphere 0.0004% co2, of which only 3% is from humans, which equates to 0.000012% of earths atmosphere!
Venus is 96% co2
Do you think comparing earth to venus it is a tad alarmist?
Absolutely it's alarmist p brain.
Do you think comparing science to propagandist right wing crap is a tad alarmist?
Select to expand quoteAUS1111 said..
Don't worry everybody - global warming is solved; New Zealand is going carbon Neutral
cheers bro!
Select to expand quoteAUS1111 said..
Don't worry everybody - global warming is solved; New Zealand is going carbon Neutral
I wonder if it works out cheaper, in the end.
NOAA said...
Atmospheric CO2 levels have increased from about 315 ppm in 1958 to 378 ppm at the end of 2004, which means human activities have increased the concentration of atmospheric CO2 by 100 ppm or 36 percent.
source: www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2005/s2412.htm
NOAA's math needs some schooling;
378-
315
=63.
Its a 20% increase, which is still troubling, IF their original figures are correct.
Their original assumption that 100 is 36% of 315 is also incorrect, it is 31.75%. Who the fluck is doing the science/maths at NOAA...
If they want to be taken seriously as an academic authority on the subject some simple fact checking would be nice.
Select to expand quoteevlPanda said..AUS1111 said..
Don't worry everybody - global warming is solved; New Zealand is going carbon Neutral
I wonder if it works out cheaper, in the end.
It helps if you have lots of mountains and snow and stuff
Select to expand quotePugwash said..
I believe it is possible that HGO2 may have had a little too much C2H6O and should move onto a whole bunch of H2O.
C2H5OH
