Forums > Kitesurfing General

Shark drumlines 1km off Dutch Inn this morning

Reply
Created by alverstone > 9 months ago, 31 Jan 2014
alverstone
WA, 533 posts
31 Jan 2014 1:43PM
Thumbs Up

OK, who will be the first to jump any of the drumlines for the shark cull put 1km off Perth beaches from Fremantle to Scarborough this morning? My brother went past Dutchies this morning and said the yellow bouys look like "they're almost on the beach".
Story below:

www.perthnow.com.au/news/wa/two-sharks-caught-just-hours-after-baited-drumlines-are-set-off-metropolitan-perth-ng-010e0af46d9405563e5ff788954dd597

Sauce
WA, 203 posts
31 Jan 2014 2:47PM
Thumbs Up

If ever there was a time to consider a kite leash...
Body dragging through burley!

WC Canvas
WA, 55 posts
31 Jan 2014 5:08PM
Thumbs Up

I am hanging on the fence with this issue. I don't want sharks killed but I don't want people dead.

Not sure why there is so much backlash to W.A for drum lining. The east coast has drum lined for decades. And also shark nets, how many hundreds or thousands of sharks have been killed in that process, I don't see or hear of much protest over there. Maybe because they don't have many shark attacks (maybe it works, people are not getting eaten and sharks are still thriving) think about it? - lets not forget that something like 70 million sharks yearly are killed worldwide for fin soup.

The spotlight probably needs to be taken off W.A a little bit and put on the big world culling issue?

This is too much of a touchy subject so I don't want to judge either way. I love the water and kiting so I definitely still be going out and jumping that drum line this afternoon. Yeeoow

Andy T
WA, 325 posts
31 Jan 2014 5:33PM
Thumbs Up

New slalom course

MOWIT
67 posts
31 Jan 2014 5:40PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Andy T said..

New slalom course



Or "Boarder Shark-across Slalom" Beach start, no need for judges, first and everyone who come back wins, simpelz

harlie
QLD, 188 posts
31 Jan 2014 7:48PM
Thumbs Up

topline said..

....
The east coast has drum lined for decades. And also shark nets, how many hundreds or thousands of sharks have been killed in that process, I don't see or hear of much protest over there. Maybe because they don't have many shark attacks (maybe it works, people are not getting eaten and sharks are still thriving) think about it? - lets not forget that something like 70 million sharks yearly are killed worldwide for fin soup.

....



This is a contentious issue over this side as well, the anti netting/drum line lobby is quite vocal.

There is probably a case of the majority of public being used to something that has been in place a long time, and the stats support it works.

Some stats

According to the International Shark Attack File maintained by the Florida Museum of Natural History, there were 118 shark attacks on people in 2012, 80 of which were unprovoked. Forty-two attacks were in the United States, 14 in Australia, four in South Africa and three in the small French island territory of Reunion. Of the 118 attacks, only seven were fatal: three in South Africa, two in Australia and one each in the US and Reunion. The long-term trend indicates an increasing number of shark attacks, possibly due to an increasing number of people going into the water, the museum says.
There is a "much higher risk of drowning at the beach (121 average a year - with 300 drownings around Australia in all aquatic venues) than from being bitten or killed by a shark".

* In New South Wales, 51 beaches are netted which began in 1937 and during 75 years while the nets have been in operation, there has been only one fatal attack on a netted beach.
http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/fisheries/info/sharksmart/meshing

* In Queensland, drum lines are also used. The Shark Safety Program has been in place since the early 1960s. A fatal attack in January 2006 is the only fatality on a protected beach, it occurred on a North Stradbroke Island beach protected by drum lines - there have been zero fatalities on netted beaches.
* In QLD in the 2011/12 summer season there were 714 sharks caught, 281 above 2 metres in shark nets and drum lines.
www.oesr.qld.gov.au/products/tables/shark-control-program-caught-area/index.php

* In Hong Kong, after the shark-attack death of three swimmers over 10 days in 1995, the government installed shark nets on all 32 gazetted beaches. There have been zero fatalities since installation in 1995.

* in Durban, South Africa there have been no fatal shark attacks since nets were installed in the 1950s, compared with seven deaths in the preceding 10 years. By contrast, according to the Crimestats SA website, in 2013 alone there were 58 reported murders in the precincts that include Durban's main beaches.

As mentioned before, statistically there are many other things more likely to kill you than a shark.

WC Canvas
WA, 55 posts
31 Jan 2014 6:19PM
Thumbs Up

Those drum lines will probably bring in some big pelagic fish as well. Msg me if anyone is keen to swim out and spear some nice fillets.

ADS
WA, 365 posts
31 Jan 2014 9:44PM
Thumbs Up

harlie said..

topline said..

....
The east coast has drum lined for decades. And also shark nets, how many hundreds or thousands of sharks have been killed in that process, I don't see or hear of much protest over there. Maybe because they don't have many shark attacks (maybe it works, people are not getting eaten and sharks are still thriving) think about it? - lets not forget that something like 70 million sharks yearly are killed worldwide for fin soup.

....



This is a contentious issue over this side as well, the anti netting/drum line lobby is quite vocal.

There is probably a case of the majority of public being used to something that has been in place a long time, and the stats support it works.

Some stats

According to the International Shark Attack File maintained by the Florida Museum of Natural History, there were 118 shark attacks on people in 2012, 80 of which were unprovoked. Forty-two attacks were in the United States, 14 in Australia, four in South Africa and three in the small French island territory of Reunion. Of the 118 attacks, only seven were fatal: three in South Africa, two in Australia and one each in the US and Reunion. The long-term trend indicates an increasing number of shark attacks, possibly due to an increasing number of people going into the water, the museum says.
There is a "much higher risk of drowning at the beach (121 average a year - with 300 drownings around Australia in all aquatic venues) than from being bitten or killed by a shark".

* In New South Wales, 51 beaches are netted which began in 1937 and during 75 years while the nets have been in operation, there has been only one fatal attack on a netted beach.
http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/fisheries/info/sharksmart/meshing

* In Queensland, drum lines are also used. The Shark Safety Program has been in place since the early 1960s. A fatal attack in January 2006 is the only fatality on a protected beach, it occurred on a North Stradbroke Island beach protected by drum lines - there have been zero fatalities on netted beaches.
* In QLD in the 2011/12 summer season there were 714 sharks caught, 281 above 2 metres in shark nets and drum lines.
www.oesr.qld.gov.au/products/tables/shark-control-program-caught-area/index.php

* In Hong Kong, after the shark-attack death of three swimmers over 10 days in 1995, the government installed shark nets on all 32 gazetted beaches. There have been zero fatalities since installation in 1995.

* in Durban, South Africa there have been no fatal shark attacks since nets were installed in the 1950s, compared with seven deaths in the preceding 10 years. By contrast, according to the Crimestats SA website, in 2013 alone there were 58 reported murders in the precincts that include Durban's main beaches.

As mentioned before, statistically there are many other things more likely to kill you than a shark.



Compelling stats, thanks Harlie

default
WA, 1255 posts
1 Feb 2014 9:46AM
Thumbs Up

I'm more embarrassed about the hysteria, hypocracy and misinformation being generated than the actual act of drum lining .. The whole thing is being blown way out of proportion

Freddofrog
WA, 522 posts
1 Feb 2014 9:49AM
Thumbs Up

Looked up some stats myself, interestingly...

Australia is 2nd for number of shark attacks and first for fatal attacks.

And of the 9 fatal shark attacks in Australia since 2010, 7 of them have been in WA (Wedge Is, Rotto, Cott, Busselton, Dunsborough, Gracetown x 2)

Oh the joys of living in the land down under...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shark_attack
www.australiangeographic.com.au/topics/science-environment/2014/01/shark-attacks-in-australia-a-timeline/

Weta
WA, 893 posts
1 Feb 2014 2:29PM
Thumbs Up

alverstone said..

OK, who will be the first to jump any of the drumlines for the shark cull put 1km off Perth beaches from Fremantle to Scarborough this morning? My brother went past Dutchies this morning and said the yellow bouys look like "they're almost on the beach".
Story below:

www.perthnow.com.au/news/wa/two-sharks-caught-just-hours-after-baited-drumlines-are-set-off-metropolitan-perth-ng-010e0af46d9405563e5ff788954dd597


The yellow markers off dutchies mark the marine park the drum line buoys are orange and there are 2 buoys to each drum line from what I have seen.

mort69
WA, 178 posts
1 Feb 2014 4:39PM
Thumbs Up

Challenge accepted

shane75
QLD, 209 posts
1 Feb 2014 9:21PM
Thumbs Up

Hmmm more ocean than land maybe if we educate the sharks to stay away from our beaches we wouldn't have to show em who's boss

Peterc150
VIC, 710 posts
1 Feb 2014 10:47PM
Thumbs Up

From theconversation.com/western-australias-shark-culls-lack-bite-and-science-21371

True effectiveness cannot be assessed by simply counting the number of sharks captured and killed. Demonstrable effectiveness means a measurable decrease in shark bite incidents in response to culling activities.

Hawaii shark control programs of the 1960s and 1970s, for example, were not demonstrably effective. These programs were expensive, culled 4,668 sharks and yet failed to produce measurable decreases in shark bite incidents.The challenges of reducing shark bites at specific locations were clearly illustrated by the events at Barbers Point on the Hawaiian island of Oahu. The 1967-69 shark control program removed 33 tiger sharks at that one location alone, yet soon after the program finished a shark bite occurred at Barbers Point.


There is no scientific basis for WA's shark cull program.

puppetonastring
WA, 3619 posts
1 Feb 2014 7:53PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
default said..

I'm more embarrassed about the hysteria, hypocracy and misinformation being generated than the actual act of drum lining .. The whole thing is being blown way out of proportion


ditto from me to those on both sides of the fence.
For what its worth (like nothing) I dont think the hook & bait will be successful at all and, just maybe, could make things worse.
It certainly does nothing to make me feel any less apprehensive about sharks when Im out there acting as an alternative piece of meat to the baited hook set to attract sharks.

Dont pretend to have the answers BUT
How about protesting over the millions of tonnes of every other sort of fish being slaughtered off the WA coast. If they were left out there there would be way too much tasty shark tucker for them to bother hunting for rare & unpalatable human flesh.
AND. How come sharks get all the kudos. Just another species. And certainly not endangered as some would have us believe.

ADS
WA, 365 posts
1 Feb 2014 8:04PM
Thumbs Up

Good point Puppet.

i don't see protesters carrying on over Kangaroo culls. Many thousands of Roos getting taken out every year...

The shark lovers need to get real. Human life is worth protecting.

WC Canvas
WA, 55 posts
1 Feb 2014 8:08PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Peterc150 said...


There is no scientific basis for WA's shark cull program.



Is human death not a good enough scientific basis?

Media has hyped up the "shark cull slogan once again" Remember its really a tag and release program with res-ponders on the seabed tracking the animals movements around the W.A metropolitan beaches.

Only animals over 3 meters will be removed from the populated beaches. It will be interesting to see in a few months how many animals are tagged and how many large animals are removed. You'll probably find it will be hardly any. "Not really what you would call a cull".

So lets wait and see the true information released in the near future before speculating on false assumptions.

Now off to Kalis Bro's for a Flake Burger and chips.

Big dubya
20 posts
1 Feb 2014 8:26PM
Thumbs Up

It's in the small print people. Read your contract, it say's you will have fun in the water but with a small chance of being eaten by a large fish.
Poor old Tiger shark never hurt anyone, well all most no one. Leave them alone I say.

cauncy
WA, 8407 posts
1 Feb 2014 8:28PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
ADS said...
Good point Puppet.

i don't see protesters carrying on over Kangaroo culls. Many thousands of Roos getting taken out every year...

The shark lovers need to get real. Human life is worth protecting.



Some humans not all

Peterc150
VIC, 710 posts
1 Feb 2014 11:43PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
topline said..


Peterc150 said...


There is no scientific basis for WA's shark cull program.




Is human death not a good enough scientific basis?

Media has hyped up the "shark cull slogan once again" Remember its really a tag and release program with res-ponders on the seabed tracking the animals movements around the W.A metropolitan beaches.

Only animals over 3 meters will be removed from the populated beaches. It will be interesting to see in a few months how many animals are tagged and how many large animals are removed. You'll probably find it will be hardly any. "Not really what you would call a cull".

So lets wait and see the true information released in the near future before speculating on false assumptions.

Now off to Kalis Bro's for a Flake Burger and chips.


Nobody is disputing that sharks kill a few humans each year in Australia, and that WA has had more fatal shark attacks recently.

However, there is no scientific evidence that baited drum lines and catching/killing some sharks actually reduces shark attacks.

Some people think catching/killing sharks will reduce attacks - but there are several marine biology and shark experts saying there is no evidence to support this notion.


ADS
WA, 365 posts
1 Feb 2014 9:17PM
Thumbs Up

Peterc150 said..

topline said..


Peterc150 said...


There is no scientific basis for WA's shark cull program.




Is human death not a good enough scientific basis?

Media has hyped up the "shark cull slogan once again" Remember its really a tag and release program with res-ponders on the seabed tracking the animals movements around the W.A metropolitan beaches.

Only animals over 3 meters will be removed from the populated beaches. It will be interesting to see in a few months how many animals are tagged and how many large animals are removed. You'll probably find it will be hardly any. "Not really what you would call a cull".

So lets wait and see the true information released in the near future before speculating on false assumptions.

Now off to Kalis Bro's for a Flake Burger and chips.


Nobody is disputing that sharks kill a few humans each year in Australia, and that WA has had more fatal shark attacks recently.

However, there is no scientific evidence that baited drum lines and catching/killing some sharks actually reduces shark attacks.

Some people think catching/killing sharks will reduce attacks - but there are several marine biology and shark experts saying there is no evidence to support this notion.




Bollocks - You should read the above posts

* In New South Wales, 51 beaches are netted which began in 1937 and during 75 years while the nets have been in operation, there has been only one fatal attack on a netted beach. http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/fisheries/info/sharksmart/meshing * In Queensland, drum lines are also used. The Shark Safety Program has been in place since the early 1960s. A fatal attack in January 2006 is the only fatality on a protected beach, it occurred on a North Stradbroke Island beach protected by drum lines - there have been zero fatalities on netted beaches.

Peterc150
VIC, 710 posts
2 Feb 2014 1:10AM
Thumbs Up

Bollocks. You are quoting figures associated with netting beaches in Eastern seaboard states and beaches where drum lines are used. Drum lines cannot protect a beach, they can only catch a shark that may attack someone.

WA is not netting beaches -they are only using drum lines. The evidence shows that shark attacks continue on beaches where drum lines are used, as you note happened on Stradbroke Island.

mikehunt
WA, 12 posts
1 Feb 2014 10:14PM
Thumbs Up

well this is what happens when you make uninformed decisions, you get a waste of money and only 2 things will come out of this

- we will learn exactly HOW many sharks are swimming around (the fear mongering will escalate)
- we will attract even MORE sharks, which will lead to more deaths of humans swimming

Mike

ADS
WA, 365 posts
1 Feb 2014 10:29PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Sorry mate, not all those beaches are netted...
You are not from WA. From May/June until the end of December Great Whites are here in large numbers. They are spotted close in
On our beaches virtually everyday. This was not the case 10 years ago or 20 years ago or 30 years ago. I know because I have surfed
here during that time.


[uquote]Peterc150 said..

Bollocks. You are quoting figures associated with netting beaches in Eastern seaboard states and beaches where drum lines are used. Drum lines cannot protect a beach, they can only catch a shark that may attack someone.

WA is not netting beaches -they are only using drum lines. The evidence shows that shark attacks continue on beaches where drum lines are used, as you note happened on Stradbroke Island.


cauncy
WA, 8407 posts
1 Feb 2014 10:35PM
Thumbs Up

If you spent the day on a cray boat and see the amount of sharks that hang around for a free feed it seems weird that you'd bait so close to shore, as I mentioned fat boy is under a bit of pressure at the moment and enticing a few sharks to catch off metro beaches will relieve that pressure, that's how it works

taxi
QLD, 416 posts
2 Feb 2014 8:54AM
Thumbs Up

The media ban wagon at its best ,it's a chance for any would be if they could be to protest about any government decision which then becomes politicaly motivated...

KBwhokbs
WA, 68 posts
2 Feb 2014 9:55AM
Thumbs Up

The anti drum line crew are right, it will never work.

What we should do is harpoon a couple of humpbacks, drag their bleeding carcasses slowly down the coast. Every big GW in the area will come in for a free feed.
Then we take 'em all out at once. Job done.

Big dubya
20 posts
2 Feb 2014 10:08AM
Thumbs Up

What I find humorous is that a lot of people who are really for shark catching and killing are folks who support Sea Shepard and all kinds of other wild life preservation. I think you call that hypocritical don't you?

alverstone
WA, 533 posts
2 Feb 2014 10:20AM
Thumbs Up

Weta said..
alverstone said..



OK, who will be the first to jump any of the drumlines for the shark cull put 1km off Perth beaches from Fremantle to Scarborough this morning? My brother went past Dutchies this morning and said the yellow bouys look like "they're almost on the beach".

Story below:



www.perthnow.com.au/news/wa/two-sharks-caught-just-hours-after-baited-drumlines-are-set-off-metropolitan-perth-ng-010e0af46d9405563e5ff788954dd597


The yellow markers off dutchies mark the marine park the drum line buoys are orange and there are 2 buoys to each drum line from what I have seen.


Yep. You're right. Sorry about that. They are using red buoys - there were two just out from Peter's Pool at Cottesloe Beach, and a couple futher north. They are also off Leighton. Apologies about the confusion, but my brother doesn't kite, so I'll blame him. That's what family is for!

PKC
WA, 130 posts
2 Feb 2014 10:29AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
mikehunt said...
well this is what happens when you make uninformed decisions, you get a waste of money and only 2 things will come out of this

- we will learn exactly HOW many sharks are swimming around (the fear mongering will escalate)
- we will attract even MORE sharks, which will lead to more deaths of humans swimming

Mike


Totally agree.

Mask
WA, 293 posts
2 Feb 2014 11:02AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Big dubya said..

What I find humorous is that a lot of people who are really for shark catching and killing are folks who support Sea Shepard and all kinds of other wild life preservation. I think you call that hypocritical don't you?


You think that's hypocritical. What about the 6000 "vegetarians" at Cottesloe yesterday? I wonder if they had a barbie or fish and chips after the event?
BTW a lot of folk who used to support and donate to Sea Shepherd probably wont anymore .



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Kitesurfing General


"Shark drumlines 1km off Dutch Inn this morning" started by alverstone