Being a smoker for 40 years i have been subject to so much anti-smoking criticism .
Anti-smoking views are so exaggerated, however i do believe smoking is not necessarily a healthy habit.
My question to all you anti-smokers is this : What would you choose to do out of the following choices ?.
1) Stand next to somebody smoking and breathe the `Passive` smoke for 1 minute. or
2) Put your nose upto the exhaust pipe of YOUR car while it is running and breathe in the fumes for 1 minute?.
Do you understand what i am saying here?.
You anti smokers bombard smokers with so much vigor, however you don`t think twice about the incredible amount
of toxic fumes that you force other people as well as yourselves to inhale.
Driving your car down to the local shop would produce more toxic fumes than if a smoker smoked a 100,000 cigerettes
in the same amount of time.
So my challenge to all you anti-smokers is stop driving YOUR cars and polluting my body and i will quit smoking.
Hows that for reality?.
This is the type of troll post that Laurie and his mates should just shut down no questions. Just rubbish posting for the sake of it. Cant get into heavy weather, so post crap here. 
You must be kidding.
I take it you are an anti smoker yourself.
Seems when a subject hits a nerve and there is no defending ones self, comments like yours, are your only way of trying
to either change the subject or get rid of the subject altogether.
How about some constructive comments, for starters, answer the question i put forward, and then explain your decision.
Otherwise don`t bother responding to this thread.
Move on if you don`t want to discuss this thread, and keep your personal dislikes to yourself.
The fact is you stink. Sorry if that sounds harsh but I can't stand being near a smoker fouling up the air.
Putting your nose up to an exhaust pipe and sniffing it for one minute is hardly an intelligent counter-argument. Good chance it will render you unconscious in half that time. Carbon monoxide poisoning is actually a pretty **** way to die.
`The fact is you stink`
Not sure about that one.
People that don`t use underarm deodorant, people with jobs that involve foul odours, people that cycle/jog etc etc.
The world is full of unpleasant smells, but smokers are not tolerated.
Getting back to my original post, i am man enough to admit i am wrong if these anti-smokers/lobbyists with all there facts that they keep pushing, give me some concrete evidence that Fumes from a car are less damaging to the environment and public health than Passive Smoke.
I knew that there would be some negative responses to this post, i also know that most of these negative responses are because
these people like to push there views about what THEY don`t like or agree with, but these same people don`t like it when
they are on the other end and have no legitimate defense/response.
Instead of calling me a troll (i had to google that word to find out what it means) just reply with some facts or something constructive and related to the subject.
You don`t have to agree with what i posted, but try to understand it and not reply with idiotic comments.
Subsonic : What's your other username? , i don`t understand what you mean by that ?
I joined this forum earlier today after seeing yet more slurs against smokers, so i am simply standing up for myself as a smoker.
But truly people that drive cars have no right to comment on the detrimental effects of passive smoking.
One car (YOUR CAR) puts out an average of 4.7 metric tons of toxic gases per year, how many cigarettes would i have to smoke per year to equal that ?.
So as i said earlier to all those anti-smokers, sell your car and find alternative transportation or if you think a car is absolutely vital trade it in on a Hybrid vehicle. Anti-smokers are so sure that passive smoke is so bad for their and everyone else`s health, i am saying to you `lead by example`, get rid of your toxic emitting car, then and only then will i believe your concerns.
I am close to 60 years old and have been smoking for 42 of those years, my dad smoked every day of his life he died in his eighties and it was not a smoke related death.
He used to put us on his knees when we were kids whilst smoking.
Eight children all still alive all smoke or used to smoke, my parents oldest child (My sister) is in her late 70`s and still going strong.
People need to stop looking for a scape goat when it comes to the environment and public health issues and start with the priorities when it comes to pollution, surely that would mean starting with motor vehicles , lobbying against Car Manufactures first, then work your way down the list. I think you will find Passive smoke along way down that list.
FOS
Ride a motor bike behind a driver smoking with the window down. That's a great excuse for blasting past in addition to benefiting your health. You'd hardly notice the cars tail pipe emissions if it is a healthy modern vehicle.
BTW, what did you lose your licence for? Or perhaps you are one of the unloved boogie boarders crying on here recently. Don't get your L plates for a while yet?
Select to expand quoteSubsonic said..
What's your other username?
The one that he is using to give himself one green thumb each post 
Buster Fin ,
`Ride a motor bike behind a driver smoking with the window down. That's a great excuse for blasting past`
My answer : You have got to be kidding me, seriously , i would love to have your incredible sense of smell, if you are going to make comments like this, don`t bother.
`You'd hardly notice the cars tail pipe emissions if it is a healthy modern vehicle.`
My answer : You don`t have to see the fumes or even smell the fumes for them to be toxic. Even the most modern cars pollute.
`BTW, what did you lose your licence for? Or perhaps you are one of the unloved boogie boarders crying on here recently. Don't get your L plates for a while yet?`
My answer : ? I have a Full/Open Car and Motorcycle licence, i have no idea what makes you think i have lost my licence?.
I have probably held my licence longer that you have lived (going by the maturity of your comments) .
I`m not here to respond to ridiculous comments, please don`t reply to this post unless, as i said before it is relative or constructive or factual. Thanks
OK,
My local shop is 400 yards away, so I figured I would try and work out how much our car emits compared to your 100k ciggies.
I did a google to try and figure out how much smoke a ciggie releases - but couldn't nail it down - too many variables for a mug like me to understand.
- type of 'baccy, how it is cut, amount of time smouldering/being drawn/temp of the burn and a myriad of other stuff.
Almost everything I found was too hard for me to follow, but the amount of crap in ciggie smoke is scary enough - thousands of chemical compounds / dozens of known carcinogens / many more confirmed as to be toxic.
When I get to the shops, I walk across the carpark and then I have to run a gauntlet through the crowd of smokers who are puffing away at the door.
I don't come home smelling of diesel or petrol fumes - but my wife and kids can certainly notice the reek of ciggies in my clothes.
Select to expand quoteHypocrites said..
i would love to have your incredible sense of smell,
well, after a lifetime of smoking, I am hardly surprised your sense of smell is shot
Chris6791,
`Good chance it will render you unconscious in half that time`
That is exactly my point, it demonstrates how much more potent / dangerous / bad for public health than Passive cigarette smoke is. Yet people are determined to do what ever they can to ban smoking and yet think nothing of jumping in their cars to go somewhere which sometimes might be within walking distance.
I`m saying, stop crucifying smokers and start cleaning up your own yard first.
sn,
`well, after a lifetime of smoking, I am hardly surprised your sense of smell is shot`
tushay
sn ,
`When I get to the shops, I walk across the carpark and then I have to run a gauntlet through the crowd of smokers`
My response to this is, when i walk anywhere where there are roads i have to breath in the toxic air of cars passing by.
The bottom line for me on this subject is :
For the anti-smokers out there, give me some facts/concrete evidence that YOUR car is not more harmful to the environment and the publics health than smoke coming from a cigarette.
If you do come up with proof i will admit i was wrong with my comments and knowledge, i will sincerely apologize to everyone concerned.
If you cannot prove this, then desist with your polluting ways or simply acknowledge that driving YOUR car is a lot more destructive and stop your bully tactics. (anti-smokers that keep pushing their views)
Select to expand quoteHypocrites said..
My response to this is, when i walk anywhere where there are roads i have to breath in the toxic air of cars passing by.
Apparently, our 7 year old car produces 147 grams per km of co2, couldn't find any mention of other nasties.
so, for the 400 metre trip we produce a bit less than 60 grams of co2. [ignoring the other nasties due to lack of info]
how many grams of co2 does your 100k ciggies produce?
Over the years, motor vehicles [and industry] have been recognised as being polluters, and legislation and regulations are continually adopted to reduce the amount of pollutants and toxins generated and often to rectify any built up residues.
These requirements are becoming tighter [cleaner] every year.
I cant burn rubbish in my back yard like we did a few years ago, or burn the leaves I rake up without a council ranger knocking on my door with an infringement book in his hand.
Many local councils will not permit the installation of some types of slow combustion wood fires in houses due to the pollution they generate.
As far as I am concerned, same rules and regs [and penalties] should apply to the burning of tobacco
sn ,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) developed this fact sheet to answer common questions about greenhouse gas emissions from passenger vehicles.
`A typical passenger vehicle emits about 4.7 metric tons of carbon dioxide per year. This number can vary based on a vehicle's fuel, fuel economy, and the number of miles driven per year`
I have had experiences of how determined anti-smokers can be to get there way.
A previous girlfriend one day told me one of her sisters and sisters husband
were coming up from sydney for a holiday.
She informed me that they would be dropping around to see us that night.
Then she proceeded to say : " When you want a smoke will you ask them if it is ok"
The fact is, when i smoked i always went outside to the patio and closed the sliding door behind me.
Yet she insisted that i ask permission from a couple that i have never met before,
if it was ok to go outside and have a smoke.(my own home)
I stood my ground and it developed into a big argument.
That is the ridiculous lengths that some will go to make sure you realize how much they hate smoking.
It is just simply out of control.
Beware the anti-smokers out there that drink alcohol, once smoking is stamped out alcohol
will be the next target. (it has actually begun)
Then you will get to taste what being victimized feels like.
I am a non drinker but i don`t go forcing anti-drinking views on people that do drink.
Drinking can and has take innocent lives.
Too many rules make jack a dull boy.
Say someone built two pubs,
one on the left side of the road and one on the right side of the road.
The pub on the left side of the road was a non smoking pub.
The pub on the right side of the road allowed smoking.
I can guarantee that the anti-smoking lobbyists would step in to ban smoking in that pub.
( I know smoking is already banned in pubs, this is simply hypothetical )
Yes or No
sn ,
`motor vehicles [and industry] have been recognised as being polluters, and legislation and regulations are continually adopted to reduce the amount of pollutants and toxins generated`
The point here is, there is so much emphasis put on how harmful Passive smoke is, so why aren`t these people trading in their toxic blowing vehicles for a less polluting Hybrid vehicle, why aren`t these people putting in the same amount of pressure on vehicle manufactures to get results as they continually do towards smokers.
As i said earlier `Priorities`, target the worst offender then move on to the next on the Priority list.
All i want to do is enjoy a smoke, yet the reaction is so overboard it is crazy.
Really it is a joke.
I would worry more about living a shorter or more unhealthy life or dying due to the highly modified foods we are sold in supermarkets now. The toxic waters that the fish we consume swim in. The Vehicle pollution. The Chemicals that are sprayed into the atmosphere daily.
Cloud Seeding etc etc etc.
As far as i`m aware these are a lot more harmful than passing someone in the street that is smoking.
Every couple of months cigarettes go up in price, that my friends is a form of `blackmail` it is a form of punishment by people
that don`t like smokers, that is bully tactics.
The Government reason for doing this (as i understand) is to cover medical expenses due to illnesses from smoking.
Unbelievable. Is it a coincidence that it was introduced by a anti-smoking TONY ABBOTT.
Never in my life have i witnessed a price increase on any product that happens every couple of months and which is ongoing.
It is Corruption at its best.
Select to expand quoteHypocrites said..
Buster Fin ,
`Ride a motor bike behind a driver smoking with the window down. That's a great excuse for blasting past`
My answer : You have got to be kidding me, seriously , i would love to have your incredible sense of smell, if you are going to make comments like this, don`t bother.
I'll feed the troll.
Ha - if you want an incredible sense of smell (ie what non-smokers generally refer to as "normal" smell) - stop smoking!
Cars, yep they pollute, but they offset that by taking us places, delivering goods & services - you know; positive things, benefits.
So tell me... what does smoking bring to humanity that is positive or a benefit? (Apart from smokers paying the 'stupid' tax?)
Or here's another way to look at it: Alcohol could be considered a similar thing. No real benefit to society, but I enjoy it and I pay the stupid tax for it. So should be able to do it where I like.
When you smoke, the by product of your smoking is, smoke; its stinks up a large area around you, gets in my eyes, lungs, hair, clothes.
The by product of me drinking alcohol is urine, which ends up in the toilet usually, so doesn't really bother anyone.
You can feel free to smoke around me, showering me in the by-product of your chosen vice if you'll happily let me reciprocate by showering you in the by-product of my chosen vice; in your eyes, lungs, hair, clothes etc.
We'll call it even then shall we? 
rod_bunny ,
Again with the Troll thing, not being familiar with forums i`m still not sure why i am being branded.
I am simply putting forward my two cents worth, or is that another option that is taken away from smokers.
It is ok to continually be subject to the voice and opinions (and actions) of anti-smokers whether we want to hear them or not.
But it seems if i (a smoker) want to defend my actions or voice my opinion, then it is somehow being interpreted as Rebellious or i am trying to cause trouble.
It sounds like you seem to expect me (a smoker) to listen and obey because you the anti-smoker are right, and if i question it i am then a trouble maker.
`incredible sense of smell `
It was meant as a joke, the fact is my sense of smell is as good as the next persons (no silly responses please)
`Cars, yep they pollute, but they offset that by taking us places, delivering goods & services`
I`m not talking about service vehicles, i`m talking about personal vehicles that are not necessary.
I`m talking to the people that make out that they are so concerned about the damage Passive smoking does to them and the environment, but will turn a blind eye to the fact that the car they drive is so so much more harmful.
As i have said if they are so concerned for there health and the health of others lead by example, use public transport, ride a push bike if possible, trade the car for a hybrid car. How many of you anti-smokers have more than one car at home ?.
People that don`t like this post i have started is simply because i have given you a legitimate argument to which, if you forced yourself to acknowledge, would threaten something you don`t want to be without, and that is your car.
Once again, tell me YOUR car is less toxic than passive smoke.
`what does smoking bring to humanity that is positive or a benefit?`
My response : It`s not a question of what does smoking bring to humanity, it is what smoking does for me.
If i am here in my unit and have a smoke, surely that is up to me.
I am all for not being allowed to smoke in public places, within reason. Being a smoker doesn`t mean i ignore the fact that some people don`t like the smell, i fully understand that.
But the Health issue is what anti-smokers are using to get there ways.
But tell me how increasing the price of cigarettes every couple of months changes things for you, besides getting a cheap thrill in the name of revenge.
`Alcohol could be considered a similar thing. So should be able to do it where I like.`
Remember what i was saying earlier Alcohol is going to be targeted next, so don`t complain when, by being a Alcohol drinker, you will be shunned and the price increasing will no doubt start happening. The Government is getting away with it with cigarettes so you can be sure they will do it to Alcohol prices when the time is right.
$150 a carton sound good ? (and rising each couple of months), remember don`t complain on a forum or you, like me, will be branded a Troll.
Select to expand quoteHypocrites said..
Chris6791,
`Good chance it will render you unconscious in half that time`
That is exactly my point, it demonstrates how much more potent / dangerous / bad for public health than Passive cigarette smoke is. Yet people are determined to do what ever they can to ban smoking and yet think nothing of jumping in their cars to go somewhere which sometimes might be within walking distance.
I`m saying, stop crucifying smokers and start cleaning up your own yard first.
Not many people stick their nose in an exhaust and those that do usually only have one thing in mind. It's not the 'toxic air' that kills them it's the displacement of oxygen molecules by the unnatural and extremely high concentration of carbon monoxide gasses that love to attach themselves to haemoglobin. On any normal day the ambient level of carbon monoxide in the atmosphere is harmless.
Toxic stuff emitted from vehicles is always getting better, has been since the 80's the risks identified, emission standards started and lead removed from fuel.
Yes, my cars' exhaust is less offensive to me than your passive smoke. Happy? Now, go away.
