Seabreeze.com.au

Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...

Subs Active Search New Topic

Great white swims in and dies at Coronation beach

Reply
Created by king of the point > 9 months ago, 16 Jul 2014
jbshack

jbshack

WA, 6913 posts
29 Jul 2014 8:14PM
Thumbs Up
Report

Select to expand quote
dan berry said..
I maybe wrong but in the first vid I saw I could see what looked like a bit of seal ( looked like a flipper) hanging out from the shard right side gills.


No your not wrong. The shark would have purged it stomach just before it died, or after it got on the sand. No argument their from me. But to then say it MAY have died from choking on that is what is being questioned. Why not check it out more thoroughly then just guessing.

Its like saying a person has a heart attack, dies and falls in the water. Would you say that person more than likely drowned, or would you in investigate the correct reason for the death..

smicko

smicko

WA, 2503 posts
29 Jul 2014 8:28PM
Thumbs Up
Report

Grevas

Grevas

147 posts
30 Jul 2014 8:11PM
Thumbs Up
Report

Third hand knowledge but, a mate of a mate who works for Fisheries in Gero did the autopsy and there was a seals top half stuck down in its throat. No reason for him to lie to us so I think that just about clears it up. Sorry if this upsets conspiracy theorists.

jbshack

jbshack

WA, 6913 posts
31 Jul 2014 10:37AM
Thumbs Up
Report

Grevas said..
Third hand knowledge but, a mate of a mate who works for Fisheries in Gero did the autopsy and there was a seals top half stuck down in its throat. No reason for him to lie to us so I think that just about clears it up. Sorry if this upsets conspiracy theorists.


That is interesting. No conspiracy theory from my behalf. I said from the start the only crime was that Fisheries didn't let the sharks body be handed over to UWA Scientists or anyone who would be able to study, learn and maybe give a true understanding as to what may have killed the shark. As for your mate of a mate Grevas id be really keen to know what they did, as Rory McAulay of fisheries said they only took skin and blood samples, thats not a autopsy So one of them is lying

Either way it would be interesting, ask him if they did actually cut up the shark or just dump the body

Oh and for having no reason to lie, well so far not a lot of truth has come from fisheries sadly..
http://www.fish.wa.gov.au/About-Us/Media-releases/Pages/Investigation-concluded-into-death-of-White-shark.aspx

smicko

smicko

WA, 2503 posts
31 Jul 2014 10:57AM
Thumbs Up
Report

jbshack said..

Grevas said..
Third hand knowledge but, a mate of a mate who works for Fisheries in Gero did the autopsy and there was a seals top half stuck down in its throat. No reason for him to lie to us so I think that just about clears it up. Sorry if this upsets conspiracy theorists.



That is interesting. No conspiracy theory from my behalf. I said from the start the only crime was that Fisheries didn't let the sharks body be handed over to UWA Scientists or anyone who would be able to study, learn and maybe give a true understanding as to what may have killed the shark. As for your mate of a mate Grevas id be really keen to know what they did, as Rory McAulay of fisheries said they only took skin and blood samples, thats not a autopsy So one of them is lying

Either way it would be interesting, ask him if they did actually cut up the shark or just dump the body

Oh and for having no reason to lie, well so far not a lot of truth has come from fisheries sadly..
http://www.fish.wa.gov.au/About-Us/Media-releases/Pages/Investigation-concluded-into-death-of-White-shark.aspx



Do you know what "vertebral" means Rod?

jbshack

jbshack

WA, 6913 posts
31 Jul 2014 11:19AM
Thumbs Up
Report

smicko said..


jbshack said..



Grevas said..
Third hand knowledge but, a mate of a mate who works for Fisheries in Gero did the autopsy and there was a seals top half stuck down in its throat. No reason for him to lie to us so I think that just about clears it up. Sorry if this upsets conspiracy theorists.





That is interesting. No conspiracy theory from my behalf. I said from the start the only crime was that Fisheries didn't let the sharks body be handed over to UWA Scientists or anyone who would be able to study, learn and maybe give a true understanding as to what may have killed the shark. As for your mate of a mate Grevas id be really keen to know what they did, as Rory McAulay of fisheries said they only took skin and blood samples, thats not a autopsy So one of them is lying

Either way it would be interesting, ask him if they did actually cut up the shark or just dump the body

Oh and for having no reason to lie, well so far not a lot of truth has come from fisheries sadly..
http://www.fish.wa.gov.au/About-Us/Media-releases/Pages/Investigation-concluded-into-death-of-White-shark.aspx




Do you know what "vertebral" means Rod?



They collected samples with syringes and small samples of skin is what has been reported by my mate of a mate..How is that an necropsy
But it will be cool to hear from Greva's friend says, as i really don't trust the person who told me..Especially as he is connected with fisheries also..

ThinkaBowtit

ThinkaBowtit

WA, 1134 posts
31 Jul 2014 12:34PM
Thumbs Up
Report

^^ Removing entire vertebrae must be a breeze with a syringe... Not.






smicko

smicko

WA, 2503 posts
31 Jul 2014 5:00PM
Thumbs Up
Report

Where's that facepalm emoticon?


Topics
Subscribe
Reply

Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...

"Great white swims in and dies at Coronation beach" started by king of the point



Register

Contact Us (Support/Help)

Terms Of Use Privacy Policy
iPhone App Android App

About

Copyright © 1997-2025 Seabreeze.com.au - All Rights Reserved.