Scientists on the global warming gravy train always shout down other scientists who claim that plant life will absorb excess CO2; their reasoning is that there isn't enough nitrogen... this has proven to be BS like all their other conclusions.
science.sciencemag.org/content/360/6384/58
That article talks about N balances over millions of year scales, so it's hardly relevant to N-fixation in current agriculture or the environment more generally.
Besides which, it looks like Australian agriculture's problem isn't a lack of fertilisers, it's a lack of rain, because the Southern Ocean cold fronts aren't coming as far north as they used to. And that was predicted decades ago.
Even two kids per couple would do....enough people choose to have 0 or 1, so we'd still get progressive reduction in population.
The biggest joke is this idea of ever increasing economic growth. People seem to think it's necessary, when it's not at all.
Imagine if the population stopped growing, so we all had enough housing, etc. Oh, but the building industry will come to a stand still and we'll all be out of jobs they shout. No, what it really means, is that we all only need to work 2 or 3 days a week to supply what the community needs. No need to build new dwellings, and there'll also be no need to expand infrastructure such as roads. etc. Will only need to maintain what we have, which means consumption of raw materials can decrease dramatically. There'll be less traffic, less stress, and probably people will have enough time to start enjoying things like sailing again.
Protesting a problem that does not exist.
Never mind the taxes on anything and everything.
Select to expand quotepetermac33 said..
Protesting a problem that does not exist.
Never mind the taxes on anything and everything.
Peter you obviously don't live in Denmark, usually one of the wettest places in WA, it's now running out of water!
Sea levels are rising, Island nations are going under water, glaciers are melting, ecosystems are moving up mountains. Many countries are experiencing the worst fire seasons on record, and the worst weather extremes, hot or cold.
The problem exists alright!
Archeological studies have confirmed this is not unusual .Much colder 300 yrs ago and warmer 1000 yrs ago and warmer again 2000 yrs ago .Sea levels/glaciers have risen and fallen accordingly.Nobody really knows what the control of that was and pretty much dont know whats happening now .If the polititions stay out of it scientists may work something out.
Yes reducing emissions is a good thing but alarmism is not.
Select to expand quoteFoghorn said..
Archeological studies have confirmed this is not unusual .Much colder 300 yrs ago and warmer 1000 yrs ago and warmer again 2000 yrs ago .Sea levels/glaciers have risen and fallen accordingly.Nobody really knows what the control of that was and pretty much dont know whats happening now .If the polititions stay out of it scientists may work something out.
Yes reducing emissions is a good thing but alarmism is not.
Yes but the ancient events happened over much longer periods, unless it was due to massive vulcanism or meteor strikes. What we are experiencing now was predicted decades ago and is happening very quickly.
Agreed alarmism can be counter productive, butvreasoned ration arguments are getting the scientist nowhere with a lot of politicians.
When the train is about to go over the cliff, all you can do is scream!
Select to expand quoteFoghorn said..
Archeological studies have confirmed this is not unusual .Much colder 300 yrs ago and warmer 1000 yrs ago and warmer again 2000 yrs ago .Sea levels/glaciers have risen and fallen accordingly.Nobody really knows what the control of that was and pretty much dont know whats happening now .If the polititions stay out of it scientists may work something out.
Yes reducing emissions is a good thing but alarmism is not.
the scientists have spoken.......they keep speaking but weird people don't believe them. also, do you think it would be alarming to think that we're influencing the climate......just suppose what the scientists are saying is correct....do you think that's alarming.
The Government scientists have spoken too on behalf of NIST.
We know their results are unadulterated BS but never mind just continue as per normal.
And the sea is also not rising decrepit.
Select to expand quotepetermac33 said..
The Government scientists have spoken too on behalf of NIST.
We know their results are unadulterated BS but never mind just continue as per normal.
And the sea is also not rising decrepit.
Untrue ,sea levels have been in a rising for 10000 yrs with a ups and downs along the way .But the trend is a creep up.
Select to expand quotepetermac33 said..>>> And the sea is also not rising decrepit.
That's where you are wrong again Peter, it hasn't risen much yet, it's early days, but it's still going upSelect to expand quote Global sea level rose about 8 inches in the last century. The rate in the last two decades, however, is nearly double that of the last century and is accelerating slightly every year.10 Image: Republic of Maldives: Vulnerable to sea level rise
It's a moot argument. Whether climate change is induced by man or not, we live on a planet of finite size and finite resources. We need to stop growing now. What's the point of making everything worse than it already is. Overcrowding, pollution, etc.
Select to expand quoteHarrow said..
Even two kids per couple would do....enough people choose to have 0 or 1, so we'd still get progressive reduction in population.
The biggest joke is this idea of ever increasing economic growth. People seem to think it's necessary, when it's not at all.
Imagine if the population stopped growing, so we all had enough housing, etc. Oh, but the building industry will come to a stand still and we'll all be out of jobs they shout. No, what it really means, is that we all only need to work 2 or 3 days a week to supply what the community needs. No need to build new dwellings, and there'll also be no need to expand infrastructure such as roads. etc. Will only need to maintain what we have, which means consumption of raw materials can decrease dramatically. There'll be less traffic, less stress, and probably people will have enough time to start enjoying things like sailing again.
It's a doable idea , a good idea .
but to grow is always at the cost of others . An expanding economy is living , breeding .
Its nature's way .
Sadly there is no more room.
ps : would love the camp fire beer with you 
Select to expand quoteFoghorn said..
Well i don't believe Micheal mann creator of fake graphs ,withholder of data.
I wonder if there are any other climate scientists
Select to expand quotelog man said..Foghorn said..
Well i don't believe Micheal mann creator of fake graphs ,withholder of data.
I wonder if there are any other climate scientists
There are plenty to choose from .
Its better to hear than make noise , ( says me 
),
Then mix what youve heard and what you think .
Thats got a point.
Pionts are good.
Select to expand quotelog man said..
the scientists have spoken
weather is climate
until it isn't
Select to expand quoteamirite said..log man said..
the scientists have spoken
weather is climate
until it isn't
are you doing poetry?
Select to expand quotedecrepit said.Global sea level rose about 8 inches in the last century. The rate in the last two decades, however, is nearly double that of the last century and is accelerating slightly every year.10 Image: Republic of Maldives: Vulnerable to sea level rise
WTF.......16 inches in two decades. Your are being led up the garden path.
No observations to show that in the slightest.
can we stop scaring each other about the climate doom and gloom? Is anyone doing anything about it, probably not becaue we talk BS and have been protesting about climate change since probably the '70s and we are now in 2019-2020 and thats like 30 years of BS yarn. Yes, the coral reef in the great barrier reef and reefs are changing and sea rise is up and ice is melting etc and is anyone doing anything about it, no.... and who and when and how....BS talk and not enough action?
Select to expand quoteDecrepit said. Global sea level rose about 8 inches in the last century. The rate in the last two decades, however, is nearly double that of the last century and is accelerating slightly every year.petermac33 said..WTF.......16 inches in two decades. Your are being led up the garden path.
No observations to show that in the slightest.
Your ignorance is mind-boggling, you can't even interpret the figures in the comment correctly - have another go, how do you get 16 without knowing the rate of sea level rise? 
Luckily your opinion (and mine) is irrelevant - we have climate scientists who actually know what they're talking about, who have observations and data we don't have access to and wouldn't understand if we did.
Our job as concerned citizen non-scientists is to ensure that our politicians listen to the scientists.
Let's simplify - if you met a climate scientist who didn't windsurf advise you how to do a planing gybe, would you think his opinion was worthwhile?
Ultimately, the global warming alarmists have another agenda.
They say that we are facing an apocalyptic event, an extinction level event. They argue that sovereign nation governments can not deal with their fabricated emergency, only global government. They argue that big rich countries are the reason small island nations are sinking (which are mostly growing in size). Only a global power can force these rich countries to hand over all their wealth. And with this wealth, this global power will flick the switch on the climate, they will create a global climate utopia that will never change. They will stop cyclones, floods, droughts etc.
This is why the global Marxist have gone all in on this climate alarmism. This is why leftist councils, and only leftist councils, are declaring climate emergencies all over the world.
It will start with a global tax, they will call it a global climate fund. This global tax office will then want to control how we can produce power and what natural resources we can take out of the ground. If we do not comply, they will take more tax or give us less of it back. We will lose our independence and our ability to be prosperous. We become more reliant on this global power for our welfare.
This process has already started
Some of the people here on this site pushing the climate alarmism are devout Marxist socialist. Their real agenda needs to questioned.
We all care about the environment. Everyone knows the climate is changing. Yet, if you question the leftist strategy to deal with it you are declared a heretic by them. Some even say these heretic should be jailed or even worse.
Families should be capped at 2 children.
In places like Japan the population is shrinking. Most other countries should be aiming for the same.
And then invent really good robots to look after the elderly cos nobody else will want to do it
If the population gets to K then we are all fighting for resources and having a miserable time...... especially when I peck out your eyes and live in your house with your wife.
Select to expand quoteShifu said..
I don't have a tv, my car is 16 years old, my laptop 13, I have hardly any furniture and what I do have I either made or restored. I have one pair of shoes and three pairs of thongs. My power bill is tiny, I use public transport to get to work. Most importantly, I didn't' Make any children. Nevertheless I am going to fry with everyone else. You fkers screwed up the planet for me with your big cars and your screaming children. Roll on public protest and civil disobedience. I hope they bring the cities to a standstill.
With 3 pairs of thongs and a 16 year old car I'm not surprised you didn't make any children
Select to expand quoteTonyAbbott said..
Ultimately, the global warming alarmists have another agenda.
They say that we are facing an apocalyptic event, an extinction level event. They argue that sovereign nation governments can not deal with their fabricated emergency, only global government. They argue that big rich countries are the reason small island nations are sinking (which are mostly growing in size). Only a global power can force these rich countries to hand over all their wealth. And with this wealth, this global power will flick the switch on the climate, they will create a global climate utopia that will never change. They will stop cyclones, floods, droughts etc.
This is why the global Marxist have gone all in on this climate alarmism. This is why leftist councils, and only leftist councils, are declaring climate emergencies all over the world.
It will start with a global tax, they will call it a global climate fund. This global tax office will then want to control how we can produce power and what natural resources we can take out of the ground. If we do not comply, they will take more tax or give us less of it back. We will lose our independence and our ability to be prosperous. We become more reliant on this global power for our welfare.
This process has already started
Some of the people here on this site pushing the climate alarmism are devout Marxist socialist. Their real agenda needs to questioned.
We all care about the environment. Everyone knows the climate is changing. Yet, if you question the leftist strategy to deal with it you are declared a heretic by them. Some even say these heretic should be jailed or even worse.
X2
Select to expand quoteTonyAbbott said..
Ultimately, the global warming alarmists have another agenda.
They say that we are facing an apocalyptic event, an extinction level event. They argue that sovereign nation governments can not deal with their fabricated emergency, only global government. They argue that big rich countries are the reason small island nations are sinking (which are mostly growing in size). Only a global power can force these rich countries to hand over all their wealth. And with this wealth, this global power will flick the switch on the climate, they will create a global climate utopia that will never change. They will stop cyclones, floods, droughts etc.
This is why the global Marxist have gone all in on this climate alarmism. This is why leftist councils, and only leftist councils, are declaring climate emergencies all over the world.
It will start with a global tax, they will call it a global climate fund. This global tax office will then want to control how we can produce power and what natural resources we can take out of the ground. If we do not comply, they will take more tax or give us less of it back. We will lose our independence and our ability to be prosperous. We become more reliant on this global power for our welfare.
This process has already started
Some of the people here on this site pushing the climate alarmism are devout Marxist socialist. Their real agenda needs to questioned.
We all care about the environment. Everyone knows the climate is changing. Yet, if you question the leftist strategy to deal with it you are declared a heretic by them. Some even say these heretic should be jailed or even worse.
Who are "They"? Names please.
