Select to expand quotePugwash said..Macroscien said..Pugwash said..Macroscien said..cisco said..
It is not about buildings crashing. It is economies crashing.
Once again China screws the world over. China is a cancer that should be cut out, irradiated and chemically destroyed.
www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-22/evergrande-collapse-could-be-very-bad-news-for-australia/100480268
Yep, Communist economy is crashing like house of cards.
Likely our economy and budget is stronger then ever.
Our real estate gain value every day- Chinese could be jealous to see how good we are doing in this difficult times.
They even now announced to stop building any coal powered plants anywhere in the world.
Good for us. We could have now all our coal for ourselves.
One may think that Chinese try to stop global warming/ climate change but smart observer may
rather see this move as targeted against our economy- as coal exporter that will have no place to send our black gold.
If they also stop construction there will be no need for our iron ore too.
Good news because more for us to build rail roads and wind turbine towers.
We dont need their 100 bln every year.
Australia has a plenty of space to catch up with the rest of the world.
On this list you hardly could see Australia, because with 24% we are still at very end of the list.
tradingeconomics.com/country-list/government-debt-to-gdp
Time to wake up and catch up !
Luckily definition of the Country do not absorb people living there.
Because people living in this lucky country could be shown to be poorest/ most indebted on the planet.
Do you feel poor?
yep, definitely.
I declared myself the poorest man on the planet ! 
my newest sail is 3 years old as secondhand and have more duck tape on it then original material
boards are fixed and returned to life from impossible to repair destruction : box fin pop up, another board broke in half now still serve as one piece slalom doing foiling job/
If you find poorest windsurfer in down under let know and I may feel better.
Beside that my funds for research and invention is zero. Sounds good for me because at least don't own debt on intellectual property rights.
Windsurfing is a sport where you are either too poor to afford the gear you want, or work too much to use all the gear you bought
You are right, I did choose the second option now and instead of being the most frequent sailor at our Broadwaters
I need to limit TOW and spend more time on dry like dirt farm....to save remaining life in my water gear...Macro will be soon rare like a hen teeth to being seen sailing ...
to be completely fair , I think that I may be sometimes financially na?ve ! ?
Our cattle agent paid me $850+gst for 500kg+ angus on the left ( that i feed and took care for two years)(less transport costs and agency fees
)
When I went to buy new young one, cant find any weaned below $1000
Select to expand quoteMacroscien said..Pugwash said..Macroscien said..Pugwash said..Macroscien said..cisco said..
It is not about buildings crashing. It is economies crashing.
Once again China screws the world over. China is a cancer that should be cut out, irradiated and chemically destroyed.
www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-22/evergrande-collapse-could-be-very-bad-news-for-australia/100480268
Yep, Communist economy is crashing like house of cards.
Likely our economy and budget is stronger then ever.
Our real estate gain value every day- Chinese could be jealous to see how good we are doing in this difficult times.
They even now announced to stop building any coal powered plants anywhere in the world.
Good for us. We could have now all our coal for ourselves.
One may think that Chinese try to stop global warming/ climate change but smart observer may
rather see this move as targeted against our economy- as coal exporter that will have no place to send our black gold.
If they also stop construction there will be no need for our iron ore too.
Good news because more for us to build rail roads and wind turbine towers.
We dont need their 100 bln every year.
Australia has a plenty of space to catch up with the rest of the world.
On this list you hardly could see Australia, because with 24% we are still at very end of the list.
tradingeconomics.com/country-list/government-debt-to-gdp
Time to wake up and catch up !
Luckily definition of the Country do not absorb people living there.
Because people living in this lucky country could be shown to be poorest/ most indebted on the planet.
Do you feel poor?
yep, definitely.
I declared myself the poorest man on the planet !
my newest sail is 3 years old as secondhand and have more duck tape on it then original material
boards are fixed and returned to life from impossible to repair destruction : box fin pop up, another board broke in half now still serve as one piece slalom doing foiling job/
If you find poorest windsurfer in down under let know and I may feel better.
Beside that my funds for research and invention is zero. Sounds good for me because at least don't own debt on intellectual property rights.
Windsurfing is a sport where you are either too poor to afford the gear you want, or work too much to use all the gear you bought
You are right, I did choose the second option now and instead of being the most frequent sailor at our Broadwaters
I need to limit TOW and spend more time on dry like dirt farm....to save remaining life in my water gear...Macro will be soon rare like a hen teeth to being seen sailing ...
to be completely fair , I think that I may be sometimes financially na?ve ! ?
Our cattle agent paid me $850+gst for 500kg+ angus on the left ( that i feed and took care for two years)(less transport costs and agency fees)
When I went to buy new young one, cant find any weaned below $1000
Dodgy neighbourhood? Someone graffitied your number plate. Look for a cow with blue paint on their hooves!
Select to expand quoteMacroscien said..Pugwash said..Macroscien said..
Do you feel poor?
yep, definitely.
I declared myself the poorest man on the planet !
my newest sail is 3 years old as secondhand and have more duck tape on it then original material
boards are fixed and returned to life from impossible to repair destruction : box fin pop up, another board broke in half now still serve as one piece slalom doing foiling job/
If you find poorest windsurfer in down under let know and I may feel better.
Beside that my funds for research and invention is zero. Sounds good for me because at least don't own debt on intellectual property rights.
Not exactly your favorite foiling board to compete with PWA Goyard
But you're the smartest person with the best ideas in the world. How are you poor?
Why don't you use your world-record brain to make some money instead of sitting behind a keyboard telling everyone else what to do?
Select to expand quoteChris 249 said..Macroscien said..Pugwash said..Macroscien said..
Do you feel poor?
yep, definitely.
I declared myself the poorest man on the planet !
my newest sail is 3 years old as secondhand and have more duck tape on it then original material
boards are fixed and returned to life from impossible to repair destruction : box fin pop up, another board broke in half now still serve as one piece slalom doing foiling job/
If you find poorest windsurfer in down under let know and I may feel better.
Beside that my funds for research and invention is zero. Sounds good for me because at least don't own debt on intellectual property rights.
Not exactly your favorite foiling board to compete with PWA Goyard
But you're the smartest person with the best ideas in the world. How are you poor?
Why don't you use your world-record brain to make some money instead of sitting behind a keyboard telling everyone else what to do?
Look at the history of the brightest.Einstein - the clerk at an patent office job
Tesla- died in ultimate poverty
You need to live to your ideas, not for the money 
beside those successful had sponsors _ Leonardo da Vinci
I have none
I could possibly apply for Salvation Army for some racing sails.....
Indeed when I sit hard on any forex I could do 10 to 100% in one week, but that is a wasted week of life, I hate it
yep, If Diogenes was controversial, Macro may be too
for some at least, or the majority even
get to level 7 of that game....
Yep, Einstien worked in a patent office - but he respected others and their knowledge, knew how to research, and amazing people already recognised his brilliance, and when he produced even more amazing ideas he received massive recognition.
After his aerofoil debacle he recognised that even he, a world-renowned genius, should do research and respect others before believing that he had worked out what they had missed.
But hey, how come someone with a Mercedes and making profits on cattle was whining last year because other people weren't giving him enough drought relief? Here's a quote from you, if you haven't forgotten;
"When I did ask to get mine piece of 50% contribution by government promised to build , improve water storage infrastructure - - request was dismissed because of the drought. Drought been called on my region and no grants available at all. My empirical test of good will government was made on mere $2500 worth storage water tank, get burned instead."
So you're driving a Merc, saying that material possessions don't matter, whining because the average taxpayer with a Corolla didn't give you money because you bought a hobby farm in the wrong place, and still not getting around to making all these amazing breakthroughs you keep on whacking on about?
You obviously DO have the money to make these amazing breakthroughs, so why not STFU and amaze us all?
Oh, and by the way we volunteers who actually go out and fight fires for people like you would like to know when you are going to get out of your Merc and start fighting fires. Or are you going to just keep on arrogantly ****ting all over the people who actually get out there and do it?
By the way, if you were the sailor most often out there sailing on the Broadwater and you are a genius, why don't you show us how many world and national trophies you have won? After all if you compare yourself to Einstien you must be like Robby Naish as well.
Select to expand quotecisco said..
It is not about buildings crashing. It is economies crashing.
Once again China screws the world over. China is a cancer that should be cut out, irradiated and chemically destroyed.
www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-22/evergrande-collapse-could-be-very-bad-news-for-australia/100480268
Sure, like there's nothing wrong with calling for mass murder. Heil Cisco!
Select to expand quoteChris 249 said..cisco said..
It is not about buildings crashing. It is economies crashing.
Once again China screws the world over. China is a cancer that should be cut out, irradiated and chemically destroyed.
www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-22/evergrande-collapse-could-be-very-bad-news-for-australia/100480268
Sure, like there's nothing wrong with calling for mass murder. Heil Cisco!
Jesus Cisco tell is what you really think? China is not going away. Their central government will sort that out quick smart. Whilst this could be a catalyst for an economic worldwide correction the markets overall are far to bouyant at the moment for it to have any major effect. The bonfire is not built high enough yet. Central banks around the world still have a lot more credit wood to stack up first.
Select to expand quoteChris 249 said..
something nasty about Macro again and again.
The question is maybe rhetoric.
Can you see something positive about Macro production?anything at all ???????
I am bored with a constant critique of everything I post, make or even think about.
Like a broken washing machine that has only one setting...rinse Macro completely
We all are only humans free to make mistakes.
One of mine could be responding to an attack but can be fixed and try ignore and did not send responses or comments to certain persons.
BTW one of Facebook's ingenious futures is the ability to filter and block contacts with unwanted people.I wish we have one day something on SB that posts from certain individuals remain completely invisible;
PS> I looks like one of my ideas on media publication had some traction recently.
It is about social censoring and truthness gauging.
Let's imagine we watch a speech or read an article. Readers or addressed audience may peer review how much truth or lie is there.
Obviously ideal will be AI mechanism based on complete wiki knowledge at access if the person speaking publically is most likely lying.
In practice it may look like that: On the TV screen with actual politician speech, will appear red bar on the side representing the level of lying.
The idea is similar to our Green and RED thumbs, but with such differences that set and tuned to max objective, without prejudice.
This way even if most hated political say something publicly that is TRUE will be marked as such.
Something electronic AI-driven lie detector LIVE.
Select to expand quoteMacroscien said..Chris 249 said..
something nasty about Macro again and again.
The question is maybe rhetoric.
Can you see something positive about Macro production?anything at all ???????
I am bored with a constant critique of everything I post, make or even think about.
Like a broken washing machine that has only one setting...rinse Macro completely
We all are only humans free to make mistakes.
One of mine could be responding to an attack but can be fixed and try ignore and did not send responses or comments to certain persons.
BTW one of Facebook's ingenious futures is the ability to filter and block contacts with unwanted people.I wish we have one day something on SB that posts from certain individuals remain completely invisible;
PS> I looks like one of my ideas on media publication had some traction recently.
It is about social censoring and truthness gauging.
Let's imagine we watch a speech or read an article. Readers or addressed audience may peer review how much truth or lie is there.
Obviously ideal will be AI mechanism based on complete wiki knowledge at access if the person speaking publically is most likely lying.
In practice it may look like that: On the TV screen with actual politician speech, will appear red bar on the side representing the level of lying.
The idea is similar to our Green and RED thumbs, but with such differences that set and tuned to max objective, without prejudice.
This way even if most hated political say something publicly that is TRUE will be marked as such.
Something electronic AI-driven lie detector LIVE.
Jeez Micro, your entire posts would be red.
A sidebar couldn't do justice to your level of BS.
Select to expand quoteUncleBob said..Macroscien said..Chris 249 said..
something nasty about Macro again and again.
The question is maybe rhetoric.
Can you see something positive about Macro production?anything at all ???????
I am bored with a constant critique of everything I post, make or even think about.
Like a broken washing machine that has only one setting...rinse Macro completely
We all are only humans free to make mistakes.
One of mine could be responding to an attack but can be fixed and try ignore and did not send responses or comments to certain persons.
BTW one of Facebook's ingenious futures is the ability to filter and block contacts with unwanted people.I wish we have one day something on SB that posts from certain individuals remain completely invisible;
PS> I looks like one of my ideas on media publication had some traction recently.
It is about social censoring and truthness gauging.
Let's imagine we watch a speech or read an article. Readers or addressed audience may peer review how much truth or lie is there.
Obviously ideal will be AI mechanism based on complete wiki knowledge at access if the person speaking publically is most likely lying.
In practice it may look like that: On the TV screen with actual politician speech, will appear red bar on the side representing the level of lying.
The idea is similar to our Green and RED thumbs, but with such differences that set and tuned to max objective, without prejudice.
This way even if most hated political say something publicly that is TRUE will be marked as such.
Something electronic AI-driven lie detector LIVE.
Jeez Micro, your entire posts would be red.
A sidebar couldn't do justice to your level of BS.
*filter applied
**post ignored
***response unneeded
Select to expand quoteFlySurfer said..
What did you expect?
Sad but true..
This guy is hired and paid to inflict max damage in relationships
this guy doesn't bother to say what he thinks...
Select to expand quoteMacroscien said..UncleBob said..Macroscien said..Chris 249 said..
something nasty about Macro again and again.
The question is maybe rhetoric.
Can you see something positive about Macro production?anything at all ???????
I am bored with a constant critique of everything I post, make or even think about.
Like a broken washing machine that has only one setting...rinse Macro completely
We all are only humans free to make mistakes.
One of mine could be responding to an attack but can be fixed and try ignore and did not send responses or comments to certain persons.
BTW one of Facebook's ingenious futures is the ability to filter and block contacts with unwanted people.I wish we have one day something on SB that posts from certain individuals remain completely invisible;
PS> I looks like one of my ideas on media publication had some traction recently.
It is about social censoring and truthness gauging.
Let's imagine we watch a speech or read an article. Readers or addressed audience may peer review how much truth or lie is there.
Obviously ideal will be AI mechanism based on complete wiki knowledge at access if the person speaking publically is most likely lying.
In practice it may look like that: On the TV screen with actual politician speech, will appear red bar on the side representing the level of lying.
The idea is similar to our Green and RED thumbs, but with such differences that set and tuned to max objective, without prejudice.
This way even if most hated political say something publicly that is TRUE will be marked as such.
Something electronic AI-driven lie detector LIVE.
Jeez Micro, your entire posts would be red.
A sidebar couldn't do justice to your level of BS.
*filter applied
**post ignored
***response unneeded
*filter applied
**post ignored
***response unneeded
Select to expand quoteMacroscien said..UncleBob said..Macroscien said..Chris 249 said..
something nasty about Macro again and again.
The question is maybe rhetoric.
Can you see something positive about Macro production?anything at all ???????
I am bored with a constant critique of everything I post, make or even think about.
Like a broken washing machine that has only one setting...rinse Macro completely
We all are only humans free to make mistakes.
One of mine could be responding to an attack but can be fixed and try ignore and did not send responses or comments to certain persons.
BTW one of Facebook's ingenious futures is the ability to filter and block contacts with unwanted people.I wish we have one day something on SB that posts from certain individuals remain completely invisible;
PS> I looks like one of my ideas on media publication had some traction recently.
It is about social censoring and truthness gauging.
Let's imagine we watch a speech or read an article. Readers or addressed audience may peer review how much truth or lie is there.
Obviously ideal will be AI mechanism based on complete wiki knowledge at access if the person speaking publically is most likely lying.
In practice it may look like that: On the TV screen with actual politician speech, will appear red bar on the side representing the level of lying.
The idea is similar to our Green and RED thumbs, but with such differences that set and tuned to max objective, without prejudice.
This way even if most hated political say something publicly that is TRUE will be marked as such.
Something electronic AI-driven lie detector LIVE.
Jeez Micro, your entire posts would be red.
A sidebar couldn't do justice to your level of BS.
*filter applied
**post ignored
***response unneeded
Here you are, I fixed it for you
# filter application failed
#post obviously not ignored
#you did.
*filter applied
**post ignored
***response unneeded
From a technical perspective ASX showing some resilience . Let's see if it breaks through old high in coming weeks
Select to expand quoteGboots said..
From a technical perspective ASX showing some resilience . Let's see if it breaks through old high in coming weeks
Agree, will be interesting to see. Personally I would prefer to see a steady course to perhaps a slow climb in values opposed to a headlong rush.
Select to expand quoteFlySurfer said..
now we could substitute mathematical formula with our tv presenter
to have the picture.
Select to expand quoteMacroscien said..FlySurfer said..
now we could substitute mathematical formula with our tv presenter
to have the picture.
I saw the show with Stan Grant. Gao is a fear monger and racist.
Select to expand quotePugwash said..Macroscien said..FlySurfer said..
now we could substitute mathematical formula with our tv presenter
to have the picture.
I saw the show with Stan Grant. Gao is a fear monger and racist.
No, get out of here, Gao a racist and fear monger, how could it be, the chinese are such a generous and accomodating community, no wait, that is the chinese that have escaped the clutches of the CCP, not the ruling party in china.
There are those here that would default to whatever china wants, could they be paid shills for china (who knows) but I for one believe that the fact that Australia, along with other western countries, are standing up for what is right, human and other, may possibly prevent another event that would see the demise of many millions of people.
I do wish that the paid shills would piss off.
Select to expand quotePugwash said..Macroscien said..FlySurfer said..
now we could substitute mathematical formula with our tv presenter
to have the picture.
I saw the show with Stan Grant. Gao is a fear monger and racist.
and constant spitting on Chinese is not racists
just a friendly gesture. (?)
Do you expect a nation of 1.5 bln people to take it lightly, bow low and nicely?
Anyway, I have also improvements to my idea of truth benchmarking future powered by AI.Obviously such a tool - like truth benchmark = could be easily manipulated.
So whether the person you don't like says could be market as a disgusting lie.In such case the person ( your adversary in such case) may say something absolutely true, Send a probe to the system.
For example, Mr Geo says 2+3= 5
But when benchmarking system pop with LIE !!
BECAUSE 2+2=4
that means the system is manipulated and do not represent real value.
But a system powered by AI will be able to detect and defend itself from deception ( like our capture asking you to show bicycles on a picture) .Constantly will learn and improve truth verification.
I try to remain absolutely neutral, objective in this dispute. In a scientific equation incorporating emotions doesn't really change the outcome/results.
In our example, time will show if committing our 1 trillion dollars in cash on spitting was worth the money.For one 1 trillion committed simply by one short-lived, frequently changing official at our helm
- when for mere 60 bln of ours money that emporium overseas jumps to throats EUvs US? France vc UK?
all to get our mere 60 bln of our petty cash?
Select to expand quoteMacroscien said..Pugwash said..Macroscien said..FlySurfer said..
now we could substitute mathematical formula with our tv presenter
to have the picture.
I saw the show with Stan Grant. Gao is a fear monger and racist.
and constant spitting on Chinese is not racists
just a friendly gesture. (?)
Do you expect a nation of 1.5 bln people to take it lightly, bow low and nicely?
Anyway, I have also improvements to my idea of truth benchmarking future powered by AI.Obviously such a tool - like truth benchmark = could be easily manipulated.
So whether the person you don't like says could be market as a disgusting lie.In such case the person ( your adversary in such case) may say something absolutely true, Send a probe to the system.
For example, Mr Geo says 2+3= 5
But when benchmarking system pop with LIE !!
BECAUSE 2+2=4
that means the system is manipulated and do not represent real value.
I try to remain absolutely neutral, objective in this dispute. In a scientific equation incorporating emotions doesn't really change the outcome/results.
In our example, time will show if committing our 1 trillion dollars in cash on spitting was worth the money.For one 1 trillion committed simply by one short-lived, frequently changing official at our helm
- when for mere 60 bln of ours money that emporium overseas jumps to throats EUvs US? France vc UK?
all to get our mere 60 bln of our petty cash?
Yes mate, we know your position. Winnie the Pooh
Select to expand quotePugwash said..Macroscien said..Pugwash said..Macroscien said..FlySurfer said..
now we could substitute mathematical formula with our tv presenter
to have the picture.
I saw the show with Stan Grant. Gao is a fear monger and racist.
and constant spitting on Chinese is not racists
just a friendly gesture. (?)
Do you expect a nation of 1.5 bln people to take it lightly, bow low and nicely?
Anyway, I have also improvements to my idea of truth benchmarking future powered by AI.Obviously such a tool - like truth benchmark = could be easily manipulated.
So whether the person you don't like says could be market as a disgusting lie.In such case the person ( your adversary in such case) may say something absolutely true, Send a probe to the system.
For example, Mr Geo says 2+3= 5
But when benchmarking system pop with LIE !!
BECAUSE 2+2=4
that means the system is manipulated and do not represent real value.
I try to remain absolutely neutral, objective in this dispute. In a scientific equation incorporating emotions doesn't really change the outcome/results.
In our example, time will show if committing our 1 trillion dollars in cash on spitting was worth the money.For one 1 trillion committed simply by one short-lived, frequently changing official at our helm
- when for mere 60 bln of ours money that emporium overseas jumps to throats EUvs US? France vc UK?
all to get our mere 60 bln of our petty cash?
Yes mate, we know your position. Winnie the Pooh+= ? 
x=?/=?
-=
Select to expand quoteMacroscien said..Pugwash said..Macroscien said..FlySurfer said..
now we could substitute mathematical formula with our tv presenter
to have the picture.
I saw the show with Stan Grant. Gao is a fear monger and racist.
and constant spitting on Chinese is not racists
just a friendly gesture. (?)
Do you expect a nation of 1.5 bln people to take it lightly, bow low and nicely?
Anyway, I have also improvements to my idea of truth benchmarking future powered by AI.Obviously such a tool - like truth benchmark = could be easily manipulated.
So whether the person you don't like says could be market as a disgusting lie.In such case the person ( your adversary in such case) may say something absolutely true, Send a probe to the system.
For example, Mr Geo says 2+3= 5
But when benchmarking system pop with LIE !!
BECAUSE 2+2=4
that means the system is manipulated and do not represent real value.
But a system powered by AI will be able to detect and defend itself from deception ( like our capture asking you to show bicycles on a picture) .Constantly will learn and improve truth verification.
I try to remain absolutely neutral, objective in this dispute. In a scientific equation incorporating emotions doesn't really change the outcome/results.
In our example, time will show if committing our 1 trillion dollars in cash on spitting was worth the money.For one 1 trillion committed simply by one short-lived, frequently changing official at our helm
- when for mere 60 bln of ours money that emporium overseas jumps to throats EUvs US? France vc UK?
all to get our mere 60 bln of our petty cash?
Sport, seeing that you are so anti Australia, perhaps you could find a more ameniable location (or perhaps you have) that will allow you to be your true self. In short, if you don't like it here , piss off.
I always laugh when I see someone trot out the "if ya dont love it, bla bla" line
always laugh at them of course....
Keep up the good work Macro.
Personally, I think there must be more than one of him to be across so many fields.
Select to expand quoteSeacht said..
I always laugh when I see someone trot out the "if ya dont love it, bla bla" line
always laugh at them of course....
Keep up the good work Macro.
Hear hear!
Love a good bigot though! Reference points. Provides perspective
Select to expand quoteMr Milk said..
Personally, I think there must be more than one of him to be across so many fields.
To be fair my cattle stock seems to be smarter than me
Today on the farm agent come to pick up my last two beasts for a nice trip to s***house.
Then both beasts jumped fences and escaped 4th time already from 4 different agents.
1.2m barbed wire jumped without hesitance, by 500kg + black angus
When is the next Olympics?
This time I was offered $2,500 for each. 
Big improvement on $850 that I cashed on on similar not long ago.
I don't care if some in this country love to be targeted by nuclear warheads.
But what about the rest?
That don't like the idea?
What about primary landowners? Did somebody ask them for an opinion?
or do they all need now to pack luggage because is not safe to live in their own country?
Select to expand quoteMacroscien said..
I don't care if some in this country love to be targeted by nuclear warheads.
But what about the rest?
That don't like the idea?
What about primary landowners? Did somebody ask them for an opinion?
or do they all need now to pack luggage because is not safe to live in their own country?
So, what you think is Australia should be targeted by nuclear weapons by China for having nuclear-powered submarines, when China has nuclear-powered submarines and nuclear weapons.
Curious.
Select to expand quotePugwash said..Macroscien said..
I don't care if some in this country love to be targeted by nuclear warheads.
But what about the rest?
That don't like the idea?
What about primary landowners? Did somebody ask them for an opinion?
or do they all need now to pack luggage because is not safe to live in their own country?
So, what you think is Australia should be targeted by nuclear weapons by China for having nuclear-powered submarines, when China has nuclear-powered submarines and nuclear weapons.
Curious.
so you think that somehow we created this invisible, untouchable island that could target the enemy without being targeted back,
something like an invisible launching pad...
just curious...
if you are serious
or
just
pretend?
PS The LOGIC is something different from LINGUISTIC.
come on Pugwash,
I did consider you one of the brains still alive
I could not argue with sky news commentators - because he is well paid to do the job, but not thinking
I could not argue with Bob, because is to dumb to understand the reasons he exists
I could not argue with our PM because its means-at the end one of us mercilessly destroyed
but I could still ask you to
THINK on your own.
