Thank you all very much for your answers. I think I will train harder on days without waves with the Pure Race 560 but as I am a fan of the Silk range I will be on the lookout for a used 650 to try it in all disciplines.
Select to expand quoteUrsus said..
Thank you all very much for your answers. I think I will train harder on days without waves with the Pure Race 560 but as I am a fan of the Silk range I will be on the lookout for a used 650 to try it in all disciplines.
I do some course racing and speed trials, and I've used the 650 Silk (I own the 850 & 1050). It is reasonably fast. I've had it at 26knots
www.gps-wingfoiling.com/default.aspx?mnu=user&val=424495&uid=26987
However it is nothing like as fast as the 700 Pure or 560 race Pure (I own the 560 and have used the 700)
I think the 700 Pure would be brilliant for slalom and course racing. It's pretty easy to get going too.
www.gps-wingfoiling.com/default.aspx?mnu=user&val=445109&uid=26987
btw I usually race on a Mikeslab 700 (Also for reference: The AFS Pure 700 is definitely as fast... probably faster actually, but doesn't have quite as good low end or ease of use as the Mikeslab)
Select to expand quoter0d said..Ursus said..
Thank you all very much for your answers. I think I will train harder on days without waves with the Pure Race 560 but as I am a fan of the Silk range I will be on the lookout for a used 650 to try it in all disciplines.
I do some course racing and speed trials, and I've used the 650 Silk (I own the 850 & 1050). It is reasonably fast. I've had it at 26knots
www.gps-wingfoiling.com/default.aspx?mnu=user&val=424495&uid=26987
However it is nothing like as fast as the 700 Pure or 560 race Pure (I own the 560 and have used the 700)
I think the 700 Pure would be brilliant for slalom and course racing. It's pretty easy to get going too.
www.gps-wingfoiling.com/default.aspx?mnu=user&val=445109&uid=26987
btw I usually race on a Mikeslab 700 (Also for reference: The AFS Pure 700 is definitely as fast... probably faster actually, but doesn't have quite as good low end or ease of use as the Mikeslab)
What great information, thank you very much. The truth is that the ML700 is the best all-round foil I have ever used. After 3 years almost exclusively with Mikeslab, I wanted to explore new foils, mainly because I use silk on prone and I wanted to spend more time on waves than on racing. But it will be difficult to find a substitute for the ML700.
Select to expand quoteUrsus said..
What great information, thank you very much. The truth is that the ML700 is the best all-round foil I have ever used. After 3 years almost exclusively with Mikeslab, I wanted to explore new foils, mainly because I use silk on prone and I wanted to spend more time on waves than on racing. But it will be difficult to find a substitute for the ML700.
Yes the AFS Silks and Mikeslabs are probably the best the foils in the world atm. I was determined to get stuff with no compromise. And for anyone reading this you won't be disappointed with either!
I need to get a shorter mast for my ML700 so I can use it in the waves more easily (I have a 102cm)
Select to expand quoter0d said..Ursus said..
What great information, thank you very much. The truth is that the ML700 is the best all-round foil I have ever used. After 3 years almost exclusively with Mikeslab, I wanted to explore new foils, mainly because I use silk on prone and I wanted to spend more time on waves than on racing. But it will be difficult to find a substitute for the ML700.
Yes the AFS Silks and Mikeslabs are probably the best the foils in the world atm. I was determined to get stuff with no compromise. And for anyone reading this you won't be disappointed with either!
I need to get a shorter mast for my ML700 so I can use it in the waves more easily (I have a 102cm)
I Rod, I notice you are UK based also. Can I ask what you use to record your speeds?
Do you use the Silks in surf, I was looking for a fast (ish) but glide friendly foil and wondering if the Silks might fit the bill?
I had the 86cm ML neck with the metal connection but I didn't like it very much.
Select to expand quoteUrsus said..
I had the 86cm ML neck with the metal connection but I didn't like it very much.
Why not? What do you use now (or don't you have ML anymore?)
Select to expand quoteMilesH said..
I Rod, I notice you are UK based also. Can I ask what you use to record your speeds?
Do you use the Silks in surf, I was looking for a fast (ish) but glide friendly foil and wondering if the Silks might fit the bill?
I use a Motion mini (which is the same Unit used at Weymouth speedweek that I take part in)
www.motion-gps.com/motion/index.html
They are the most accurate and quite cheap.
I use the Silk in flat water and in surf, they have such fantastic carving and gliding performance and deal well with broken whitewater. They are also pretty fast and very secure and easy which is exactly what you need when you are dropping down a swell at speed!
Most of my surf / swell riding happens in S Wales (Porthcawl) and occasionally Pembrokeshire.
Select to expand quoter0d said..Ursus said..
Thank you all very much for your answers. I think I will train harder on days without waves with the Pure Race 560 but as I am a fan of the Silk range I will be on the lookout for a used 650 to try it in all disciplines.
I do some course racing and speed trials, and I've used the 650 Silk (I own the 850 & 1050). It is reasonably fast. I've had it at 26knots
www.gps-wingfoiling.com/default.aspx?mnu=user&val=424495&uid=26987
However it is nothing like as fast as the 700 Pure or 560 race Pure (I own the 560 and have used the 700)
I think the 700 Pure would be brilliant for slalom and course racing. It's pretty easy to get going too.
www.gps-wingfoiling.com/default.aspx?mnu=user&val=445109&uid=26987
btw I usually race on a Mikeslab 700 (Also for reference: The AFS Pure 700 is definitely as fast... probably faster actually, but doesn't have quite as good low end or ease of use as the Mikeslab)
May I ask you which stab you're using for the AFS Pure 700?
Select to expand quoteusa22 said..r0d said..Ursus said..
Thank you all very much for your answers. I think I will train harder on days without waves with the Pure Race 560 but as I am a fan of the Silk range I will be on the lookout for a used 650 to try it in all disciplines.
I do some course racing and speed trials, and I've used the 650 Silk (I own the 850 & 1050). It is reasonably fast. I've had it at 26knots
www.gps-wingfoiling.com/default.aspx?mnu=user&val=424495&uid=26987
However it is nothing like as fast as the 700 Pure or 560 race Pure (I own the 560 and have used the 700)
I think the 700 Pure would be brilliant for slalom and course racing. It's pretty easy to get going too.
www.gps-wingfoiling.com/default.aspx?mnu=user&val=445109&uid=26987
btw I usually race on a Mikeslab 700 (Also for reference: The AFS Pure 700 is definitely as fast... probably faster actually, but doesn't have quite as good low end or ease of use as the Mikeslab)
May I ask you which stab you're using for the AFS Pure 700?
I haven't tried the pure 700
Currently;
silk 1050 + mako Carve v2
silk850 + mako Glide v2
pure 560 race
I've used the 145 pure stab on the Pure 900 and the 150 on the 700. I found the 150 with its swept back profile a bit loose and preferred the 145 with its straight HA.shape.
How are the Mako tails?
I was tryng the Pure 700 with ha135, this is what Axel Gerard should use in racing lightwind and comes close to the 560 race setup. Then with 145 stab, this feels more comfortable for me. Did not try with the 150 until now. Seems this is the freestyle option in forward mounted position.
Is Silk still magic foil even though some time has passed since it's been launched? I'm thinking to switching to Silk mainly for Wingfoiling in waves. When I said it to someone he said it's a slow boring foil good for beginner prone but now it's old and should look into something else. Frankly I think he is full of it but I don't have opportunity to test it. Appreciate your input.
I think that "someone" hasn't used Silk enough. I was with MikesLab for several years, and the only thing I've tried that brings me back to the fun is AFS SILK. I use it mainly for prone riding and wingfoiling in waves. It's not especially fast on the GPS, but it's very responsive.
I think that "someone" hasn't used Silk enough. I was with MikesLab for several years, and the only thing I've tried that brings me back to the fun is AFS SILK. I use it mainly for prone riding and wingfoiling in waves. It's not especially fast on the GPS, but it's very responsive.
Select to expand quotereal1 said..
Is Silk still magic foil even though some time has passed since it's been launched? I'm thinking to switching to Silk mainly for Wingfoiling in waves. When I said it to someone he said it's a slow boring foil good for beginner prone but now it's old and should look into something else. Frankly I think he is full of it but I don't have opportunity to test it. Appreciate your input.
Best carving and most fun of any foil on the market and standing the test of time IMO. I've got the whole quiver and a wide range of tails that make them absolute magic for winging, swell riding, parawinging, slashing waves.
Have you seen this vid from Guy Bridge?
shot with the Silks so yeah very much a beginnersfoil
Still love mine for winging in the waves as well flats. In proper powerfull Ocean swell (wich I only see on holiday trips) its great to supfoil as well.
Select to expand quotereal1 said..
Is Silk still magic foil even though some time has passed since it's been launched? I'm thinking to switching to Silk mainly for Wingfoiling in waves. When I said it to someone he said it's a slow boring foil good for beginner prone but now it's old and should look into something else. Frankly I think he is full of it but I don't have opportunity to test it. Appreciate your input.
I still basically only ride the Silks. If I thought there was something better I would be on it. If you want to surf hard this is the foil. It is so far from boring, this person is delusional!
Though so! I'm still in doubt between 80 or 85 mast. Mostly it will be for Wingfoil mostly waves and choppy Sea. Not huge swell some ground swell but mostly wind swell. But would like to be ok also in west France when it gets bigger. Thanks for advice.
Though so! I'm still in doubt between 80 or 85 mast. Mostly it will be for Wingfoil mostly waves and choppy Sea. Not huge swell some ground swell but mostly wind swell. But would like to be ok also in west France when it gets bigger. Thanks for advice.
Demo an Enduro if you can. With a small shimmed tail the 700 is a hoot. I found it better than the 650 silk in small to medium waves especially after the initial steep part of the wave has finished. Handles good sized waves but not as well as the silk. At 90kg I found the silks harder to keep going, the Enduro glides forever. Rode with Guy when he was here, absolute freak going so deep at the steepest part of the wave which is where the silk excels.
Young guns here are doing just a fraction over 35 knots speed on Duotone 550 Blitz.
I have the 800 on the way.
Select to expand quotewarwickl said..
Young guns here are doing just a fraction over 35 knots speed on Duotone 550 Blitz.
I have the 800 on the way.
You might need to explain what that has to do with a wave riding foil like the AFS Silk
Skinny is a bit softer or? I'm 75kg you think Enduro would be better at my weight as well? I think 700 enduro is to small to be single foil and I don't like more than 90cm span on enduro 900. I was thinking Silk 850 and Pure 700 v2 for a bit more glide and speeding in more than 15knt. Makes sense?
Skinny masts are uhm with uhm core so super stiff. What you get from them is more sensitive and lively carving.
Select to expand quotereal1 said..
Skinny is a bit softer or? I'm 75kg you think Enduro would be better at my weight as well? I think 700 enduro is to small to be single foil and I don't like more than 90cm span on enduro 900. I was thinking Silk 850 and Pure 700 v2 for a bit more glide and speeding in more than 15knt. Makes sense?
I had Silk and Enduros and found it a bit of a pain swapping between the two. The Silks ride a bit nose up compared to the Enduro so to get a similar feel I had to shim the mast for the Silk. First world problems I know but it was for me about feel. Demo if you can.
Select to expand quotereal1 said..
Skinny is a bit softer or? I'm 75kg you think Enduro would be better at my weight as well? I think 700 enduro is too I small to be single foil and I don't like more than 90cm span on enduro 900. I was thinking Silk 850 and Pure 700 v2 for a bit more glide and speeding in more than 15knt. Makes sense?
If I were you I'd just go with the Silk 850 and wait and see what comes out this fall before adding a second foil. Kind of curious myself what the future holds.
I agree with you on spans over 900 . a little is ok though. An Enduro 800 might be interesting. I did think the 900 was pretty good with a smaller tail.
I've been riding the UHM 80 and it does everything I want.
Tony
Select to expand quotekiter63 said..real1 said..
Skinny is a bit softer or? I'm 75kg you think Enduro would be better at my weight as well? I think 700 enduro is too I small to be single foil and I don't like more than 90cm span on enduro 900. I was thinking Silk 850 and Pure 700 v2 for a bit more glide and speeding in more than 15knt. Makes sense?
If I were you I'd just go with the Silk 850 and wait and see what comes out this fall before adding a second foil. Kind of curious myself what the future holds.
I agree with you on spans over 900 . a little is ok though. An Enduro 800 might be interesting. I did think the 900 was pretty good with a smaller tail.
I've been riding the UHM 80 and it does everything I want.
Tony
Future looks good. A 600 Enduro would be sick.
Their tails are too big. Loving the cut down HA38 and Crisp 130 flex
Select to expand quotereal1 said.. I think 700 enduro is too small to be single foil and
The Enduro 700 has the equivalent lift of the silk 850 with more speed and glide.
