Even though I can only afford a seconhand 2016 model, I though't I'd kick off the 2918 iSonic thread with picture of the IS137 :)
Select to expand quotemark62 said..
Even though I can only afford a seconhand 2016 model, I though't I'd kick off the 2918 iSonic thread with picture of the IS137 :)
Is that the best that 900 years of R&D can come up with?
I could only imagine what the boards would look like in 9 millenniums from now.thats like 20 generations of board designers past down.
Select to expand quotegavnwend said..
I could only imagine what the boards would look like in 9 millenniums from now.thats like 20 generations of board designers past down.
I guess you mean centuries...
Select to expand quotephiln said...
Is that the best that 900 years of R&D can come up with?
At least it will be 900% faster than last years model
Select to expand quotegavnwend said..
I could only imagine what the boards would look like in 9 millenniums from now.thats like 20 generations of board designers past down.
This 
I see they brought the 2016 iS134 shape back (making my 2nd hand purchase even better). Loads (possibly complicated) light wind Isonic options, 117/127/134/137 and 147/157/Ultrasonic!!
Select to expand quotemark62 said..
I see they brought the 2016 iS134 shape back (making my 2nd hand purchase even better). Loads (possibly complicated) light wind Isonic options, 117/127/134/137 and 147/157/Ultrasonic!!
Curious how that 100cm wind isonic compares to a formula board and the ultrasonic...
Select to expand quotemy7thlife said..mark62 said..
I see they brought the 2016 iS134 shape back (making my 2nd hand purchase even better). Loads (possibly complicated) light wind Isonic options, 117/127/134/137 and 147/157/Ultrasonic!!
Curious how that 100cm wind isonic compares to a formula board and the ultrasonic...
And so short too
Select to expand quoteBSN101 said..my7thlife said..mark62 said..
I see they brought the 2016 iS134 shape back (making my 2nd hand purchase even better). Loads (possibly complicated) light wind Isonic options, 117/127/134/137 and 147/157/Ultrasonic!!
Curious how that 100cm wind isonic compares to a formula board and the ultrasonic...
And so short too
& A shade darker
Select to expand quoteBSN101 said..my7thlife said..mark62 said..
I see they brought the 2016 iS134 shape back (making my 2nd hand purchase even better). Loads (possibly complicated) light wind Isonic options, 117/127/134/137 and 147/157/Ultrasonic!!
Curious how that 100cm wind isonic compares to a formula board and the ultrasonic...
And so short too
So they can make it faster, better planning blablabla in 2019
Select to expand quotephiln said..mark62 said..
Even though I can only afford a seconhand 2016 model, I though't I'd kick off the 2918 iSonic thread with picture of the IS137 :)
Is that the best that 900 years of R&D can come up with?Select to expand quotephiln said..mark62 said..
Even though I can only afford a seconhand 2016 model, I though't I'd kick off the 2918 iSonic thread with picture of the IS137 :)
Is that the best that 900 years of R&D can come up with?
Haha, only just noticed the 2918. I must have had to much meths on my cornflakes that day!!!
That balsa board certainly looks sharp, great presentation IMO.
But the underside of the nose does look like my floor :)
the 2018 137 seems to been working alright :
www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10156191130517708&set=a.10150270809327708.346854.837067707&type=3&theater&ifg=1
Select to expand quoteWaiting4wind said..
That balsa board certainly looks sharp, great presentation IMO.
But the underside of the nose does look like my floor :)
The finish on it looks pretty smickSelect to expand quoteseanhogan said..
the 2018 137 seems to been working alright :
www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10156191130517708&set=a.10150270809327708.346854.837067707&type=3&theater&ifg=1
Wow that's moving Sean on that size board 
Select to expand quotevando said..Waiting4wind said..
That balsa board certainly looks sharp, great presentation IMO.
But the underside of the nose does look like my floor :)
The finish on it looks pretty smickseanhogan said..
the 2018 137 seems to been working alright :
www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10156191130517708&set=a.10150270809327708.346854.837067707&type=3&theater&ifg=1
Wow that's moving Sean on that size board
ahhahah too much credit Vando !!! Not me ! best I did on a 137 was 31knts with 9.5 and I was quite happy with that ;-)
the facebook link sends you to gunnar's page
Yesterday my new Isonic 107 arrived. Was a little surprised, since I found a Deep TuttleBox in my board. Based on the specification the 107 has a TuttleBox but no DeepTuttle.
Dear other 107/2018 owner, have you also a DeepTuttle box built in?
Select to expand quoteBBsurfer said..
Yesterday my new Isonic 107 arrived. Was a little surprised, since I found a Deep TuttleBox in my board. Based on the specification the 107 has a TuttleBox but no DeepTuttle.
Dear other 107/2018 owner, have you also a DeepTuttle box built in?
Theyve been deep tuttle for a few years now. My 2017 107 is deep tuttle, and the 2016 was also deep tuttle. The smaller size boards are tuttle.
Deeep tutle on the 107???? I've ordered one and already purchased 2 carbon fin for it...better be a Tuttle like the specs on their website...
Buds with 2013 isonic 107's use f4 foils in their medium depth tuttle boxes, just barely fit but tight. So tis not truely deep, nor truely standard.
My '10 Futura misses by 6mm.
yes its not deep tuttle , i think jp calls it m-tuttle medium tuttle. on youtube theres a vid with someone who explains , the chinook boxes are m tuttle ... ?? ;-(
