Forums > Windsurfing   Gps and Speed talk

GTC 2009: Claimed speed?

Reply
Created by nebbian > 9 months ago, 11 Dec 2008
wa881
WA, 218 posts
12 Dec 2008 2:48PM
Thumbs Up

Sailquik, that's interesting...... Maybe a separate issue, my Garmin always shows higher readouts on the display that what Realspeed calculates. Last night that difference was 1.7Knots ! Not insignificant .....it could well be what i am doing with my data, which is nothing other than uploading it, but if there is a better way to more accurately reflect what speeds I am actually achieving, then I am all for it.

sailquik
VIC, 6165 posts
12 Dec 2008 4:55PM
Thumbs Up

Paul Kelf said...


I thought you could set the GTs to either Doppler or Trackpoint.
Would using Trackpoint reduce the risk of spikes with the GTs?



Certainly. The use of GT's brings with it all the Satellite and HDOP data etc that the software can use to filter spikes and errors automatically, whether you use trackpoints data or Doppler data. BTW, no adjustment is necessary by the user. The data for both Doppler and trackpoints is in the GT files.



That's a worry because I discard a lot of Speeds & Alphas because of spikes, maybe more education is required.



It is, and has always been a problem with Garmins. It is still somewhat of a problem with Alphas and GT's but I think we might have that solved soon.



Are the tracks that much cleaner using Doppler?



The Doppler data does suffer from a lot less error, but as I said before, the software does and excellent job of filtering the trackpoint data as well from a GT-*.



It would seem we can only go by trust anyway as we upload our own numbers


Of course that is the basis of this type of comp but we address that by having 'validation' checking of PB's and at random by the timekeeper when he requests files.



I'm just trying to get a better understanding of the differences & BTW I am changing to a GT31


Good for you Paul! We need more to take that step.

sailquik
VIC, 6165 posts
12 Dec 2008 5:11PM
Thumbs Up

wa881 said...

Sailquik, that's interesting...... Maybe a separate issue, my Garmin always shows higher readouts on the display that what Realspeed calculates. Last night that difference was 1.7Knots ! Not insignificant .....it could well be what i am doing with my data, which is nothing other than uploading it, but if there is a better way to more accurately reflect what speeds I am actually achieving, then I am all for it.


That will probably be because the screen readout is calculated on 1 second (Doppler) speed but the saved trackpoints are 2 second (at least they should be). It is a bit strange though because most people find the calculated speeds are often higher than the screen readout because of trackpoint grid effect error. It may be that your speed runs are orientated at a different heading. ie: along the 'grid' instead of across it.

paddymac
WA, 938 posts
12 Dec 2008 3:38PM
Thumbs Up

Hi Nebs, I reckon a poll would show that most people aren't that concerned. This is a fun thing and I'd speculate that most people are after relative results (have I improved?) and team participation (did any of my runs make it into the team's scores for a given month?). The "noise" is too small to sweat. Good on you though for again trying to make this great idea (GTC) even better.

mathew
QLD, 2133 posts
12 Dec 2008 4:52PM
Thumbs Up

nebbian said...
The problem with people using trackpoints is that most people don't know what a spike looks like. They load up their file, type in 6 numbers and a quick story and hit submit.

If you are experienced in data analysis then this isn't an issue, but most people aren't experienced (and sometimes don't even click on each value to see what it looks like on the map display).

This is why I would prefer that everyone use doppler (or be penalised for using trackpoints). You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out how fast you went if you use doppler.


Analysing data-errors isn't that hard for almost every corner case - the problem is that those "bad data rules" arn't yet available in the various programs. For example, I have quite a few tracks where RealSpeed and GPSResults incorrectly chose the wrong section of data -> some nice rules like "sailors cant turn 90deg. within 1 sec" would go a long way (ie: not a data "spike", but definitely a reality spike...).**

** That is not a criticism of the programs - just an observation on how they could be enhanced.


Some people wrote above that the team aspect will average out any high scores, but this doesn't take into account the personal rankings -- which some people put a lot of weight on. What use is a personal ranking page if you can't trust the data that's on it?


This feature was added after first explaining that GPSSS already existed, but since GPSTC already some data regarding the sailor, so showing that page is pretty simple. The fact is that we cant "trust" any of the data as it relies on the user uploading their own values (eg: GPSSS had someone recently post a 47kn run on a slalom board... mistakes always happen). The trust factor that you are alluding to, wont be fixed by removing a fraction of a knot.


I guess the general consensus is that we shouldn't change the numbers that people submit, but we should put in an option to say which device and calculation method the person is using. This would then make it obvious how much faith we can put on that number.
I would also like to put something in the rules to say that you "enter the speed that you think is correct". If you choose to use claimed speed, doppler or trackpoint, then that's up to you.


That is an excellent idea. It states firmly that you are only cheating yourself.


It might seem to some people that I'm being overly pedantic, but people really do take this thing seriously, and if we can get the rules correct then we hopefully won't have another fiasco like as happened this year where someone decided to leave the challenge. I really don't want that to happen again.


This is just my two cents here... as I saw it, people were being truthful according to the previously outlined "rules". The problem appeared to be the change of rules that some people inferred, as the year went on.

Aka, just like the addition of the individual-sailor page, where it was first stated that it wasn't accurate as it didn't undergo vetting, unlike GPSSS which has regional RTK's.

25
WA, 319 posts
12 Dec 2008 10:49PM
Thumbs Up

This is the thread we had to have!
It has overlapped and combined with the GTC 2009 thread.
Respect to Nebs for the courage to put it out.
It is true that whilst being a team based concept there is a serious individual side to it for many [me included] and this will not ever contract.
From where I sit this is an issue that needs to be sorted out so we don't get more of the sort of disagreement that led to a top sailor like Chris Dimond exiting the contest – please rejoin Chris!
My interpretation is that the consensus seems to be that the admin guru [Ben] should put in a mandatory option [check box] to declare which device and calculation method the poster is using.
As has been inferred by many, this would then make it obvious whether we are comparing an apple with an apple or a pineapple!
I reckon its a winner!

sailpilot
QLD, 785 posts
13 Dec 2008 1:25AM
Thumbs Up

I guess some people are fairly competitive so its a valid concern to even things out, I'm a foretrex user and have absolutely no problem with a small reduction calculated by the site being applied if that brings the number closer to the "true" speed.
I'd get more value in upgrading my gear than tossing out a useable GPS just to post doppler.

AUS1111
WA, 3621 posts
13 Dec 2008 10:27AM
Thumbs Up

Hopefully in 2009 anyone who does fall into the "serious" category will be using a GT11 or GT31.

As much as we all want Garmin users included, the simple fact is that they are just not very accurate - neither the screen readout or the trackpoint data. On my garmin the screen readout, which is supposedly the more accurate, is frequently as much as two knots over.

firiebob
WA, 3172 posts
13 Dec 2008 2:50PM
Thumbs Up

25 said...

This is the thread we had to have!
It has overlapped and combined with the GTC 2009 thread.
Respect to Nebs for the courage to put it out.
It is true that whilst being a team based concept there is a serious individual side to it for many [me included] and this will not ever contract.
From where I sit this is an issue that needs to be sorted out so we don't get more of the sort of disagreement that led to a top sailor like Chris Dimond exiting the contest – please rejoin Chris!
My interpretation is that the consensus seems to be that the admin guru [Ben] should put in a mandatory option [check box] to declare which device and calculation method the poster is using.
As has been inferred by many, this would then make it obvious whether we are comparing an apple with an apple or a pineapple!
I reckon its a winner!



re check box's.

nebbian
WA, 6277 posts
13 Dec 2008 4:16PM
Thumbs Up

The people have spoken.

Checkboxes it is.

Thanks once again for all your valuable input, I wouldn't be able to do this without all the ideas and debate that you speedsters contribute.

Enjoy your sailing



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Windsurfing   Gps and Speed talk


"GTC 2009: Claimed speed?" started by nebbian