I would love to see properly tuned gear from 1990, 95, 2000, etc. Be interesting to know when it peaked. I'm using a late 90s wave sails in 4.2 and 4.7, loving them. Can't say they're any slower, certainly way better built!
I also have latter '90's 4-4.7 sails, and use them.
I also have 2019 Duotone Super Sessions in those sizes, and use them.
Select to expand quoteManuel7 said..
I would love to see properly tuned gear from 1990, 95, 2000, etc. Be interesting to know when it peaked. I'm using a late 90s wave sails in 4.2 and 4.7, loving them. Can't say they're any slower, certainly way better built!
Are they really better built? Im usimg Simmer, off the back of using KA and i cannot fault either brands construction.
In the 90's i used north. Cant fault their build.
However there was a time in the 90's where some brands race sails were built super light and wouldnt last. In 2000's going to formula events and seeing bins loaded full of broken masts.
As far as sails, masts and booms are concerned it is brand specific as to build quality.
Design on the other hand. Id rather current gear than 90's gear. Significant developmemt occurred.
Select to expand quoteduzzi said..cammd said..duzzi said..Shifu said..Gestalt said..
this video will hopefully put to bed the idea that longer narrower shapes are somehow superior at early planing, upwind and gybing.
Bus still superior at feeling good! 
I really don't think a long and narrow board "feels good" when going downwind in chop and swell. Or, as the video points out, when trying to jibe in overpowered conditions. ..
If you go to either extreme of being long and narrow (Raceboard) vs short and wide (Formula) for "feels good" down wind the long and narrow feels soooooooooooo much better. My heart rate would be probably 30% less on a RB powered up down wind vs being on a Formula in the same conditions.
No idea, but I doubt I would take either in anything more than 15 knots. A modern raceboard is a boat: 68 cm wide by 377 long by 280 liters ... 
That explains why you think a long and narrow board doesn't feel good in chop and swell downwind
Select to expand quotecammd said..duzzi said..cammd said..duzzi said..Shifu said..Gestalt said..
this video will hopefully put to bed the idea that longer narrower shapes are somehow superior at early planing, upwind and gybing.
Bus still superior at feeling good!
I really don't think a long and narrow board "feels good" when going downwind in chop and swell. Or, as the video points out, when trying to jibe in overpowered conditions. ..
If you go to either extreme of being long and narrow (Raceboard) vs short and wide (Formula) for "feels good" down wind the long and narrow feels soooooooooooo much better. My heart rate would be probably 30% less on a RB powered up down wind vs being on a Formula in the same conditions.
No idea, but I doubt I would take either in anything more than 15 knots. A modern raceboard is a boat: 68 cm wide by 377 long by 280 liters ...
That explains why you think a long and narrow board doesn't feel good in chop and swell downwind
You are just confusing the waters, too much chop! We are taking about slalom boards. 90s vs current designs.
They are apples and oranges but you want to compare Formula boards with Race Boards open another thread ...
Select to expand quoteGestalt said..
Feels like the Severne fox put that idea to bed.
So Gestalt, I appreciate that you consider the Severne Fox to be the pinnacle of all round boards, I assume because it has a soft ride due to a heap of V, and gybes nicely as well. But in every video of it I've seen it looks slow. What's the best GPS speed that has been done on one?
Select to expand quotePacey said..Gestalt said..
Feels like the Severne fox put that idea to bed.
So Gestalt, I appreciate that you consider the Severne Fox to be the pinnacle of all round boards, I assume because it has a soft ride due to a heap of V, and gybes nicely as well. But in every video of it I've seen it looks slow. What's the best GPS speed that has been done on one?
To be fair i didn't say the fox was the pinnacle of all round boards.
I said the fox proves wrong the idea that longer boards ride more comfortable. The fox has been praised widely as being a game changer in that regard.
Select to expand quotePacey said..Gestalt said..
Feels like the Severne fox put that idea to bed.
So Gestalt, I appreciate that you consider the Severne Fox to be the pinnacle of all round boards, I assume because it has a soft ride due to a heap of V, and gybes nicely as well. But in every video of it I've seen it looks slow. What's the best GPS speed that has been done on one?
I'm sure Fyfe has done a 2 sec somewhere between 34 to 36 kt.
From the gps-speedsurfing site.
Fox 95 max 2 second speed 34.89 knots or more meaningful average of top 5 10s of 33.09
He sailed on his own, a lot of Dutch spots are really flat so not a good measure of how good the board is.
www.gps-speedsurfing.com/default.aspx?mnu=user&val=313794&uid=3309
Board Severne fox 95, 2018
Sail RRD X-Wing MK1 6.2, 2019
Fin Select SELECT ELITE S1 HI-WIND 33
Fox 120 max 2 second speed 33.5 knots or more meaningful average of top 5 10s runs of 32.39 knots.
www.gps-speedsurfing.com/default.aspx?mnu=user&val=291680&uid=5042
Board Severne Fox 120, 2018
Sail Challenger Sails Aero v9 7.0, 2019
Fin Select S1 Slam evo 39
He was 7th fastest out of 21 that day. Ignoring Hans Kreisel's vastly superior speeds as he is one of the worlds top speed sailors, the Fox was 2 knots down on the 2nd fastest.
www.gps-speedsurfing.com/default.aspx?mnu=forum&forum=2&val=138278
I'd say the Fox is quick, not as fast as a slalom board but still quick.
Not being a fan of SB, but I think the question you need to ask is not whether it is quick or not but whether you enjoy riding them and I think you'd find the peoples pretty happy
Select to expand quoteGestalt said..
I said the fox proves wrong the idea that longer boards ride more comfortable.
That's my point, I don't think the videos show that at all. The Fox proves you can make a short fat board more comfortable by adding V to the bottom shape. But there is no free lunch, you also get a reduction in speed as a result, if that wasn't true then all slalom racing boards would have adopted it immediately.
Select to expand quotePacey said..Gestalt said..
I said the fox proves wrong the idea that longer boards ride more comfortable.
That's my point, I don't think the videos show that at all. The Fox proves you can make a short fat board more comfortable by adding V to the bottom shape. But there is no free lunch, you also get a reduction in speed as a result, if that wasn't true then all slalom racing boards would have adopted it immediately.
I don;t know what videos you mean. there are none of the fox in this thread.
Select to expand quoteGestalt said..Pacey said..Gestalt said..
I said the fox proves wrong the idea that longer boards ride more comfortable.
That's my point, I don't think the videos show that at all. The Fox proves you can make a short fat board more comfortable by adding V to the bottom shape. But there is no free lunch, you also get a reduction in speed as a result, if that wasn't true then all slalom racing boards would have adopted it immediately.
I don;t know what videos you mean. there are none of the fox in this thread.
Google is your friend
Well i looked at the vid in the other thread with the south african girl and the fox looks lit!
Select to expand quoteGestalt said..
Well i looked at the vid in the other thread with the south african girl and the fox looks lit!
What, like at 19:20 in this video
i own a lot of old long boards saloms and later free race boards i also had a 120l and 140 liter fox.the 140 l is 3 to 4 knts faster than my 136 super sport jp in our bumpy bay conditions with a 8.5 but in flater lake conditions the ss will blow it of the water .i think it would depend on the area and conditions to decide what is best for the average sailor the fox is quicker on to the plain then ss
Severne Fox is pretty fast in real world conditions. Saw this post a couple of weeks ago.
www.facebook.com/groups/1042817712457508/permalink/4510851528987425/
"My wife and I went up for a week in Avon NC. We had two windy days followed by 2 light days. Followed by 3 windy days. In the video, gusts were into the mid 30s. Sustained winds of 28-30. The high wind slalom races from the day before were called when gusts were approaching 45mph. We did three heats of light wind races and three of high wind races. One discard for each participant and one was recalled after we all finished for all due to chaos (most sailors - me not included! - followed someone around the wrong mark). I started the high wind racing with a 7.3m. I quickly dropped to a 6.2 for race 1. A 5.4 for race 2. A 4.8 for race 3. I got 2nd place for men's open.
...I rode the 105 for the high wind races. It was amazing. I was consistently in the front to the first mark. For two of the races, I was second to the first and second marks. I have never gone that fast in 30mph winds before. No joke, I was the fastest person in the water when we were goofing off on Saturday morning (when the video was shot). I broke 30mph in 2-3 foot chop numerous times without really trying."
Select to expand quotePacey said..Gestalt said..
Well i looked at the vid in the other thread with the south african girl and the fox looks lit!
What, like at 19:20 in this video
where she is is talking about how controllable the board is and a guy on a slalom board goes past her like she is standing still?
The guy on the Patrik slalom board is bearing away at least 10 degrees more than Karo and hence will be faster.
Slalom boards are faster if you have the skill. The Fox is easier to sail and hence faster for sailors who don't have the skill to make a slalom board go fast in big chop.
It's instructive that the Fox gets universally good reviews from sailors all over the world. Severnne have really nailed this design.
I have a love hate relationship with my super fragile F2 Silber,something , ( I think it's German ) ,slalom, 82 , wide .
Its light and fast on all points of sail , but when it gets choppy it's all over the place like a mad woman's sh.t .
Its like Its going to grab and crash , pitching all angles , but it doesn't. Going into a bumpy gybe is scary , it wants to get air . I know , I'm not committed enough .
I can see someone with skills showing who's boss and winning races on it , just not me 
When it gets gnarly , I prefer my double concave V board .
Kinda like the Fox only heavier. Uglier , and probably not as good . Similar vibe ?
Select to expand quoteRichardG said..
He says the Mistral Energy is fast and he hasn't even used it properly-speaks volume for a board which costs now less than a carton of cans if you find one
I have one exactly the same as the one Nico was on in the video. It's in very good condition in the roof of my parent's garage and I'm willing to sell it for two cartons of cans - and not a can less.
That board was really fast but didn't like to be gybed (at least not by me) 
It is always "the nut on the tiller" that is most important that is why one design is so cool. 20-30 knots for the Windsurfer Class WA State Titles:
www.facebook.com/100014023759223/videos/1031048417372607/
