A lot of guys taking top spots with wave sails, seems you don't need a slalom sail to go quick and then there's the guys on full wave kit right up there as well.
Sailor skill counts for a lot.
But all you need is to move the mast base back and the foot straps forward, so you can sail in a modern upright stance and you beat the best![]()
Day 1 in 40 knots Tommy Traversa had a 4m wave sail and 68l speed board and finished 59th in 40:38. Only 6 minutes 22 seconds down on the leaders time of 33:00.
Ben Proffit's time was 41:47, not far behind Phil Koster, not sure what he used.
www.windmag.com/defi-wind-infos-officielles
Ben was on 4.2 wave sail and I think 90l wave board
some worry about putting a race sail on a free ride board, well if a slave sail on a speed board works it can't be that bad
A lot of guys taking top spots with wave sails, seems you don't need a slalom sail to go quick and then there's the guys on full wave kit right up there as well.
Cross posting, below Andrea Cucchi compares 7.5 and change slalom sails with zero, two and three cams, in ideal conditions. No difference in speed.
Add 15 knots, chop, and a loooooong distance race and one can see why a wave kit would work well ...
Cross posting, below Andrea Cucchi compares 7.5 and change slalom sails with zero, two and three cams, in ideal conditions. No difference in speed.
I like Andrea Cucci as he is an enthusiastic owner of a windsurf company who does his own R&D.
But, who uses a 7.8m race sail and 7.5m no cam sail in the same windspeed? Thats a no cam freerace type sail, not wave sail.
He actually tells you the speed difference between the sails, which is why they use cammed sails for racing.
He has posted stuff like that before. The largest difference between a full on race sail and no cam freerace is the battery power required to get the speeds.

some worry about putting a race sail on a free ride board, well if a slave sail on a speed board works it can't be that bad
TT was about 8 minutes behind in the other 2 races. How far would he be behind on a race sail?
some worry about putting a race sail on a free ride board, well if a slave sail on a speed board works it can't be that bad
TT was about 8 minutes behind in the other 2 races. How far would he be behind on a race sail?
Who knows but would he be able to control it, he only weighs like 65kg, he's a tiny fella. So that means he was suing a board around his body weigh in volume.
Think on the first day it was more survival racing from what I have seen.
I think I'd want gear that I know very well in wild conditions, be it wave or slalom. A lot of sailors just don't have small race sails or their brand doesn't make one. Hence the wave sail, sometimes control is king.
Sailor skill counts for a lot.
But all you need is to move the mast base back and the foot straps forward, so you can sail in a modern upright stance and you beat the best![]()
Day 1 in 40 knots Tommy Traversa had a 4m wave sail and 68l speed board and finished 59th in 40:38. Only 6 minutes 22 seconds down on the leaders time of 33:00.
Ben Proffit's time was 41:47, not far behind Phil Koster, not sure what he used.
www.windmag.com/defi-wind-infos-officielles
Only 6 minutes? a gap of 6 mins is a lifetime when your talking about racing.
Sailor skill counts for a lot.
But all you need is to move the mast base back and the foot straps forward, so you can sail in a modern upright stance and you beat the best![]()
Day 1 in 40 knots Tommy Traversa had a 4m wave sail and 68l speed board and finished 59th in 40:38. Only 6 minutes 22 seconds down on the leaders time of 33:00.
Ben Proffit's time was 41:47, not far behind Phil Koster, not sure what he used.
www.windmag.com/defi-wind-infos-officielles
Only 6 minutes? a gap of 6 mins is a lifetime when your talking about racing.
yes and no, racing is sometimes as close as a 1000th of a second but when most of the field are from different disciplines and you have wave sailors and racers together then its a totally different thing.
Most people were about 1:30 hours after the first placed bloke.
Also its a fun race and not a World Cup slalom race so not winning by 6 minutes isn't that bad. Also the course is mile long too, I have seen slalom races that are a kilometre long and some are 30 seconds behind the leader.
Cross posting, below Andrea Cucchi compares 7.5 and change slalom sails with zero, two and three cams, in ideal conditions. No difference in speed.
I like Andrea Cucci as he is an enthusiastic owner of a windsurf company who does his own R&D.
But, who uses a 7.8m race sail and 7.5m no cam sail in the same windspeed? Thats a no cam freerace type sail, not wave sail.
He actually tells you the speed difference between the sails, which is why they use cammed sails for racing.
He has posted stuff like that before. The largest difference between a full on race sail and no cam freerace is the battery power required to get the speeds.
Not sure what does it matter if you like Andrea Cucchi or not ...
But anyway, if anything the cam sails, AC-Z and AC-ONE, have a small size advantage 7.8 vs 7.5 for the ACX. Andrea Cucchi is going at quite a pace, 37 knots and change over 500 meters. It is a pace of a pro-level slalom sailor, like he is, and still there is no speed advantage for the ACZ or AC-ONE. (Which of course does not mean that cams have not other advantages in a race situation.) So, a wave sail for regular sailors might be competitive in much windier conditions, say, 25-30 knots. Competitive or not, if Dunkerbeck says that he used a 5.5 race sail and he was maxed out, well ... many of us would be forced to use a wave sail ... few have a race 5.0 or smaller in their quiver.
Marion Mortefon at 6:08 on a wave sail
I think I'd want gear that I know very well in wild conditions, be it wave or slalom. A lot of sailors just don't have small race sails or their brand doesn't make one. Hence the wave sail, sometimes control is king.
I agree. I'm sure if the riders could have got their hands on a 4.5 cammed race sails they would have used them.
Or a even a camless freerace sail in 4.5.
I believe alot of the non pwa racers were mentioning their smallest race sail was 5.5ish
I'd imagine the 4.6 severne overdrive would have been a pretty good choice compared to a 4.2 wave sail.
I have got a 4.2m sail and although its about 13 years old its as good as new as we barley get that sort of wind here.
The Defi though is considered to be a windy area and I'm surprised that the Pro's didn't pack really small sails for it.
I have got a 4.2m sail and although its about 13 years old its as good as new as we barley get that sort of wind here.
The Defi though is considered to be a windy area and I'm surprised that the Pro's didn't pack really small sails for it.
In the men the pros that race had sails for it - as far as I have seen anyway. Didn't see AA, mortefon, vonk, matciek etc on anything other than full race kit. How good was it that AA got it done in those conditions, bloke is pushing 50 and they are 10km reaches in around 40knts. Apparently on a sail that had turned up 2 days prior.
Pretty cool looking event
Not sure what does it matter if you like Andrea Cucchi or not ...
But anyway, if anything the cam sails, AC-Z and AC-ONE, have a small size advantage 7.8 vs 7.5 for the ACX. Andrea Cucchi is going at quite a pace, 37 knots and change over 500 meters. It is a pace of a pro-level slalom sailor, like he is, and still there is no speed advantage for the ACZ or AC-ONE. (Which of course does not mean that cams have not other advantages in a race situation.) So, a wave sail for regular sailors might be competitive in much windier conditions, say, 25-30 knots. Competitive or not, if Dunkerbeck says that he used a 5.5 race sail and he was maxed out, well ... many of us would be forced to use a wave sail ... few have a race 5.0 or smaller in their quiver.
I mentioned I like Andrea Cucci because I was about to pick holes in his advertising. Nothing against him.
If I was sailing with a cammed race sail I would be using about 1m larger than a no cam sail.
I think he said the ACK run was fast because he found some flatter water between the swells.
On the photo with the GPS he spent a LOT more time on the ACX to get those speeds than the AC-One.
In his videos of winter training on Tenerife, he had his top PWA racers on ACX against other 'normal' national level racers on their race sails and the ACX sailor won, because they were top level PWA racers, not because the ACX was as fast as a race sail.
If you want to believe no cams are as fast as cammed, carry on.
I use a GPS and my speeds on 3 cam freerace sails are faster than no cammed. The only board I have used both types of sail was my Exocet Cross 90l. The 3 cam was only 1-2 knots faster on the 10 second average, depending on the sail size.
Marion Mortefon won the women's with a 4m wave sail, Sarah Jackson was 3rd 3:30 behind with a 5m race sail. I think the difference is in sailor skill and Sarah was too overpowered with a 5m.
Yes, if you dont have a small race sail a wave sail will get you around the course at a good speed.
You dont see speed sailors on no cam sails, Why? Because they arent as fast.
For the recreational sailor, using no cammed sails is a good idea as they are less hassle and easier to use. I stopped using freerace sails 7 years ago in favour of 2 cam/no cam freeride sails. But I dont go as fast.
Sailor skill counts for a lot.
But all you need is to move the mast base back and the foot straps forward, so you can sail in a modern upright stance and you beat the best![]()
Day 1 in 40 knots Tommy Traversa had a 4m wave sail and 68l speed board and finished 59th in 40:38. Only 6 minutes 22 seconds down on the leaders time of 33:00.
Ben Proffit's time was 41:47, not far behind Phil Koster, not sure what he used.
www.windmag.com/defi-wind-infos-officielles
Only 6 minutes? a gap of 6 mins is a lifetime when your talking about racing.
Yeah, I said "only" in a sarcastic way,
In R1, the UK slalom champion James Dinsmore finished 10:57 behind Albeau. My local spot speedster was 15:52 behind. I dont know if they had bad starts or whatever, but the level between Albeau and 'ordinary' sailors is huge.
Anyone who attends Defi with a priority on their finishing position if given the choice would rig a sail with cams
Freeride & wave sails are great but they don't compare to a Slalom sail with cams in racing
Respect for all riders no matter what they use as not everyone goes to Defi to finish up the front on the water, just being there makes all seabreezers envious
Bring on day 3
Can't wait for more vids and pics
can't believe no mention of a foil winning a race. in 40 knots.
Don't mention it and it might be forgotten ![]()
The only way to stop foils winning all events from here out is to ban them
Next generation windsurfing is here and that's progress for you
Biggest shift in the sport for some time
can't believe no mention of a foil winning a race. in 40 knots.
Don't mention it and it might be forgotten ![]()
The only way to stop foils winning all events from here out is to ban them
Next generation windsurfing is here and that's progress for you
Biggest shift in the sport for some time
yeah agree, certainly thought the death of fins for racing
can't believe no mention of a foil winning a race. in 40 knots.
A foil didn't win a race in 40 knots? Won two in 30-35 though. But was quite a gap to the next foil, it's amazing how much better he is on the foil than everyone else. From winning euro iq one week to 35 knot 10km races the next he's got it all covered.
Apparently last day of defi they are expecting to be a bit lighter again so we will see more of the regular top pwa sailors on foils, bit interesting to see how much they get beaten by
can't believe no mention of a foil winning a race. in 40 knots.
A foil didn't win a race in 40 knots? Won two in 30-35 though. But was quite a gap to the next foil, it's amazing how much better he is on the foil than everyone else. From winning euro it's one week to 35 knot 10km races the next he's got it all covered.
Apparently last day of defi they are expecting to be a bit lighter again so we will see more of the regular top pwa sailors on foils, bit interesting to see how much they get beaten by
Correct. In R1 Goyard was 3:16 down.
He won R2 & R3 'lighter' winds, and now todays R4, and leads overall after a discard.
Earlier in the weekend he said to Ben that he had to keep jumping to get the weed off the foil and crashed 4 times.
Happy to race against any foil at Lake George
Ya on... See ya in the big lake ![]()
![]()
Top 4 in R4 were all on foils. Sounds like the wind didnt really play ball.
Imagine the Defi start if everyone was on foils![]()
With current kit you can just about mix foiling and fin. In the not too distant future it will be utterly pointless. Foils can and will be going a lot quicker. I don't think this should mean the death of fin sailing, it's just a different discipline.( Edit and a lot of people simply won't want to be flying along at over 40 knots as a standard speed,the energy of 40 knot + crashes are significantly more than 30. I guess you could always limit the foil sizes( large) to keep them slow)
Not sure what does it matter if you like Andrea Cucchi or not ...
But anyway, if anything the cam sails, AC-Z and AC-ONE, have a small size advantage 7.8 vs 7.5 for the ACX. Andrea Cucchi is going at quite a pace, 37 knots and change over 500 meters. It is a pace of a pro-level slalom sailor, like he is, and still there is no speed advantage for the ACZ or AC-ONE. (Which of course does not mean that cams have not other advantages in a race situation.) So, a wave sail for regular sailors might be competitive in much windier conditions, say, 25-30 knots. Competitive or not, if Dunkerbeck says that he used a 5.5 race sail and he was maxed out, well ... many of us would be forced to use a wave sail ... few have a race 5.0 or smaller in their quiver.
I mentioned I like Andrea Cucci because I was about to pick holes in his advertising. Nothing against him.
If I was sailing with a cammed race sail I would be using about 1m larger than a no cam sail.
I think he said the ACK run was fast because he found some flatter water between the swells.
On the photo with the GPS he spent a LOT more time on the ACX to get those speeds than the AC-One.
In his videos of winter training on Tenerife, he had his top PWA racers on ACX against other 'normal' national level racers on their race sails and the ACX sailor won, because they were top level PWA racers, not because the ACX was as fast as a race sail.
If you want to believe no cams are as fast as cammed, carry on.
I use a GPS and my speeds on 3 cam freerace sails are faster than no cammed. The only board I have used both types of sail was my Exocet Cross 90l. The 3 cam was only 1-2 knots faster on the 10 second average, depending on the sail size.
Marion Mortefon won the women's with a 4m wave sail, Sarah Jackson was 3rd 3:30 behind with a 5m race sail. I think the difference is in sailor skill and Sarah was too overpowered with a 5m.
Yes, if you dont have a small race sail a wave sail will get you around the course at a good speed.
You dont see speed sailors on no cam sails, Why? Because they arent as fast.
For the recreational sailor, using no cammed sails is a good idea as they are less hassle and easier to use. I stopped using freerace sails 7 years ago in favour of 2 cam/no cam freeride sails. But I dont go as fast.
Not sure where you see the advertisement. Point-7 has four race sails on the line up, ACX, ACZ, ACK and AC-ONE, and they are very clear saying that cam sails are best for racing! They spell it out for you in detail: point-7.com/2020/03/17/the-ac-line/?v=7516fd43adaa.
Cams give you more power and keep you going in lulls. More Speed? Questionable if powered up, unless you cross above PWA top speed of 35-37 knots, and are on a speed strip.
But again you are missing the whole point. That is that for a long distance race (especially one with one jibe!) in very windy conditions a no-cam sail can be very competitive ... or be a survival tool for light and/or not-pro level sailor: if you do not finish it does not matter how fast you go!
Not sure what does it matter if you like Andrea Cucchi or not ...
But anyway, if anything the cam sails, AC-Z and AC-ONE, have a small size advantage 7.8 vs 7.5 for the ACX. Andrea Cucchi is going at quite a pace, 37 knots and change over 500 meters. It is a pace of a pro-level slalom sailor, like he is, and still there is no speed advantage for the ACZ or AC-ONE. (Which of course does not mean that cams have not other advantages in a race situation.) So, a wave sail for regular sailors might be competitive in much windier conditions, say, 25-30 knots. Competitive or not, if Dunkerbeck says that he used a 5.5 race sail and he was maxed out, well ... many of us would be forced to use a wave sail ... few have a race 5.0 or smaller in their quiver.
I mentioned I like Andrea Cucci because I was about to pick holes in his advertising. Nothing against him.
If I was sailing with a cammed race sail I would be using about 1m larger than a no cam sail.
I think he said the ACK run was fast because he found some flatter water between the swells.
On the photo with the GPS he spent a LOT more time on the ACX to get those speeds than the AC-One.
In his videos of winter training on Tenerife, he had his top PWA racers on ACX against other 'normal' national level racers on their race sails and the ACX sailor won, because they were top level PWA racers, not because the ACX was as fast as a race sail.
If you want to believe no cams are as fast as cammed, carry on.
I use a GPS and my speeds on 3 cam freerace sails are faster than no cammed. The only board I have used both types of sail was my Exocet Cross 90l. The 3 cam was only 1-2 knots faster on the 10 second average, depending on the sail size.
Marion Mortefon won the women's with a 4m wave sail, Sarah Jackson was 3rd 3:30 behind with a 5m race sail. I think the difference is in sailor skill and Sarah was too overpowered with a 5m.
Yes, if you dont have a small race sail a wave sail will get you around the course at a good speed.
You dont see speed sailors on no cam sails, Why? Because they arent as fast.
For the recreational sailor, using no cammed sails is a good idea as they are less hassle and easier to use. I stopped using freerace sails 7 years ago in favour of 2 cam/no cam freeride sails. But I dont go as fast.
Not sure where you see the advertisement. Point-7 has four race sails on the line up, ACX, ACZ, ACK and AC-ONE, and they are very clear saying that cam sails are best for racing! They spell it out for you in detail: point-7.com/2020/03/17/the-ac-line/?v=7516fd43adaa.
Cams give you more power and keep you going in lulls. More Speed? Questionable if powered up, unless you cross above PWA top speed of 35-37 knots, and are on a speed strip.
But again you are missing the whole point. That is that for a long distance race (especially one with one jibe!) in very windy conditions a no-cam sail can be very competitive ... or be a survival tool for light and/or not-pro level sailor: if you do not finish it does not matter how fast you go!
I'm not missing anything. Read the last paragraph of my previous post, which you quoted.
You are just confusing the issue by posting videos of 7.8m race sails v 7.5m no cam sails, then talking about 40 knots wind.
According to friends who have been there, there is more wind down the course than at the start. Also, the wind angle varies. Sometimes its upwind on the reach back and my friend said he had to tack to make the finish.
BTW, 3 gybes at the Defi.
Not sure what does it matter if you like Andrea Cucchi or not ...
But anyway, if anything the cam sails, AC-Z and AC-ONE, have a small size advantage 7.8 vs 7.5 for the ACX. Andrea Cucchi is going at quite a pace, 37 knots and change over 500 meters. It is a pace of a pro-level slalom sailor, like he is, and still there is no speed advantage for the ACZ or AC-ONE. (Which of course does not mean that cams have not other advantages in a race situation.) So, a wave sail for regular sailors might be competitive in much windier conditions, say, 25-30 knots. Competitive or not, if Dunkerbeck says that he used a 5.5 race sail and he was maxed out, well ... many of us would be forced to use a wave sail ... few have a race 5.0 or smaller in their quiver.
I mentioned I like Andrea Cucci because I was about to pick holes in his advertising. Nothing against him.
If I was sailing with a cammed race sail I would be using about 1m larger than a no cam sail.
I think he said the ACK run was fast because he found some flatter water between the swells.
On the photo with the GPS he spent a LOT more time on the ACX to get those speeds than the AC-One.
In his videos of winter training on Tenerife, he had his top PWA racers on ACX against other 'normal' national level racers on their race sails and the ACX sailor won, because they were top level PWA racers, not because the ACX was as fast as a race sail.
If you want to believe no cams are as fast as cammed, carry on.
I use a GPS and my speeds on 3 cam freerace sails are faster than no cammed. The only board I have used both types of sail was my Exocet Cross 90l. The 3 cam was only 1-2 knots faster on the 10 second average, depending on the sail size.
Marion Mortefon won the women's with a 4m wave sail, Sarah Jackson was 3rd 3:30 behind with a 5m race sail. I think the difference is in sailor skill and Sarah was too overpowered with a 5m.
Yes, if you dont have a small race sail a wave sail will get you around the course at a good speed.
You dont see speed sailors on no cam sails, Why? Because they arent as fast.
For the recreational sailor, using no cammed sails is a good idea as they are less hassle and easier to use. I stopped using freerace sails 7 years ago in favour of 2 cam/no cam freeride sails. But I dont go as fast.
Not sure where you see the advertisement. Point-7 has four race sails on the line up, ACX, ACZ, ACK and AC-ONE, and they are very clear saying that cam sails are best for racing! They spell it out for you in detail: point-7.com/2020/03/17/the-ac-line/?v=7516fd43adaa.
Cams give you more power and keep you going in lulls. More Speed? Questionable if powered up, unless you cross above PWA top speed of 35-37 knots, and are on a speed strip.
But again you are missing the whole point. That is that for a long distance race (especially one with one jibe!) in very windy conditions a no-cam sail can be very competitive ... or be a survival tool for light and/or not-pro level sailor: if you do not finish it does not matter how fast you go!
I'm not missing anything. Read the last paragraph of my previous post, which you quoted.
You are just confusing the issue by posting videos of 7.8m race sails v 7.5m no cam sails, then talking about 40 knots wind.
According to friends who have been there, there is more wind down the course than at the start. Also, the wind angle varies. Sometimes its upwind on the reach back and my friend said he had to tack to make the finish.
BTW, 3 gybes at the Defi.
What's confusing? If a no-cam sail in light winds is straight-line is as fast as a cam sail, in high winds a no-cam sail would have quite a fighting chance. And not just in long distance. A-/B-class slalom series at Crissy often saw people with a variety of no-cam sails in high wind conditions. If you lost something on the straight you gained a real lot in the jibes.