Select to expand quoteDunkO said..
And a true representation of popular view only works if it's anonymous. If your post get red thumbed that's a cue to that maybe there's an alternate view out there.
the worlds is soft enough, suck it up buttercups
I understand where you are coming from Dunko. There is always a plethora of views in the ether but I consider jumping in and having a conversation is how we learn new perspectives. Clicking likes or pumping thumbs does no more than turn dialogue into a popularity contest. And maybe generate some easy coin for Laurie due to clicks Vs advertising...
Select to expand quoteBrent in Qld said..DunkO said..
And a true representation of popular view only works if it's anonymous. If your post get red thumbed that's a cue to that maybe there's an alternate view out there.
the worlds is soft enough, suck it up buttercups
I understand where you are coming from Dunko. There is always a plethora of views in the ether but I consider jumping in and having a conversation is how we learn new perspectives. Clicking likes or pumping thumbs does no more than turn dialogue into a popularity contest. And maybe generate some easy coin for Laurie due to clicks Vs advertising...
Sure, but the green on its own is dumb
If you really want red thumbs ..... just reverse your colours. You can do it on wind, so why not?
How to read the Wind Forecast Graphs
Did you know that the arrow colours are reversible?
This site was originally built for Windsurfers & Kitesurfers - where strong wind is a good thing, so green=strong wind.
If you fish or surf, then light wind is a good thing, so .. red=strong wind.
Really weird to be talking so heavily about thumbs. If you were around in the 1970's then you would know that two fingers were used to show that someone disagreed with you.
Select to expand quoteMarkSSC said..
Really weird to be talking so heavily about thumbs. If you were around in the 1970's then you would know that two fingers were used to show that someone disagreed with you.
70s AD/CE kids know which came first 
The thumbs were added to provide feedback to posters when people couldn't be bothered typing. Much like you'd grimace, smile etc. We don't always need to talk to get our point across. 
Due to the inventive nature of humans, it soon became a tool. Haters of a particular poster would then go on a binge of red-thumbing every post by a particular person. Childish yes, but .. it's what happened. And happened a lot.
So then we introduced ratios to combat this. We introduced limits. So then people go create extra logins to continue their red thumb fest. And before you know it, thumbing became a moderation task, and we're like .. "How did we get here?"
So.. we decided to remove red thumbs, and the results have been good.
However: this are still issues with particular members, and so today, we introduce the new "Hide Member" feature.
If someone really bothers you, you can hide their posts, and you'll not see their posts again. Only posts by the user. If somebody quotes them, that post will still appear in your feed. To hide a member, view their profile and select "Hide". Easy.
It is saddening that we've had to add the feature, but .. such is the nature of things.
Enjoy..
Select to expand quoteMarkSSC said..
The amount of social media censorship is wrong because the person censoring assumes that they have a superior moral character.
The problem is if you give people to ability to hide behind anonymity any moral character goes out the window. In many ways social media networks only amplified the worst behaviour in society... and I am not just talking about the people commenting or leaving ratings.
Select to expand quoteSeabreeze said..
So then we introduced ratios to combat this. We introduced limits. So then people go create extra logins to continue their red thumb fest. And before you know it, thumbing became a moderation task, and we're like .. "How did we get here?"
In the words of Mike Tyson: "Social media made you all way too comfortable with disrespecting people and not getting punched in the face for it."
Select to expand quotesomeone said..
If someone really bothers you, you can hide their posts, and you'll not see their posts again. Only posts by the user. If somebody quotes them, that post will still appear in your feed. To hide a member, view their profile and select "Hide". Easy.
Enjoy..
Who said that... ?
Select to expand quoteSeabreeze said..
The thumbs were added to provide feedback to posters when people couldn't be bothered typing. Much like you'd grimace, smile etc. We don't always need to talk to get our point across.
Due to the inventive nature of humans, it soon became a tool. Haters of a particular poster would then go on a binge of red-thumbing every post by a particular person. Childish yes, but .. it's what happened. And happened a lot.
So then we introduced ratios to combat this. We introduced limits. So then people go create extra logins to continue their red thumb fest. And before you know it, thumbing became a moderation task, and we're like .. "How did we get here?"
Enjoy..
You even had limits on the number of green thumbs, but I expect many people never realised it 
Admins- is it reciprocal?
ie: If I click on hide and I don't see their rubbish anymore, so they also not see my posts ?
Select to expand quoteJohn340 said..tbwonder said..t36 said..
This is not prohibiting a Dunning-Kruger-victim like LeeD to post hot air in multiple threads parallel, but every new or unexperienced user knows after one view on his points, what's going on.
Suspension is the best solution for people like this, which is what appears to have happened.
Alleluia, I think you might be right. I wonder how long for?
I thought his name was Lee and he is using his 4th account.
I see that on the bottom of the page it says
New: You can "Hide" members from your feed by viewing their profile, and choosing "Hide"
It looks like a good idea. If they bug you, you can just hide their comments and eventually they will be in a room all by themselves. But for newer people, they might be "scared off" by some of the comments by such users.
Select to expand quoteMark _australia said..
Admins- is it reciprocal?
ie: If I click on hide and I don't see their rubbish anymore, so they also not see my posts ?
Sorry Mark, I don't think anybody can read this... 
Bring back the red thumbs, there's already too much control in WA. I reckon when red thumbs went not long after the forum posts decreased.
So a few people get upset getting a red thumb, they can reflect on why they got it and then harden up.
How do you know who you have hidden?
I just hid the x2 guys above that suggested this .. and now I have no idea of their names to unhide them?
gone forever
Select to expand quoteJakeNN said..
How do you know who you have hidden?
I just hid the x2 guys above that suggested this .. and now I have no idea of their names to unhide them?
gone forever
Browser history?
Select to expand quotestehsegler said..MarkSSC said..
The amount of social media censorship is wrong because the person censoring assumes that they have a superior moral character.
The problem is if you give people to ability to hide behind anonymity any moral character goes out the window. In many ways social media networks only amplified the worst behaviour in society... and I am not just talking about the people commenting or leaving ratings.
Yes, I never understood why anonymity became the default setting on most "social media" platforms. It is not a big problem on small platforms like this forum, but it is a contributing factor to uncivilized behavior, or worse, on large ones.
Select to expand quoteJakeNN said..
How do you know who you have hidden?
I just hid the x2 guys above that suggested this .. and now I have no idea of their names to unhide them?
gone forever
Go to your own Profile page, there is a new tab called "Hidden", which lists all those you have chosen to hide.
Select to expand quoteMark _australia said..
Admins- is it reciprocal?
ie: If I click on hide and I don't see their rubbish anymore, so they also not see my posts ?
Serious question. It is more about them not replying to all my stuff with nonsense in attempt to bait...
Select to expand quoteMark _australia said..Mark _australia said..
Admins- is it reciprocal?
ie: If I click on hide and I don't see their rubbish anymore, so they also not see my posts ?
Serious question. It is more about them not replying to all my stuff with nonsense in attempt to bait...
I can't tell you the definitive answer for this forum (but I will give an answer anyway), but it won't be reciprocal. You will only not see posts from people you have selected and have no control over whether they see yours or not.
It doesn't matter anyway does it? If you are filtering them you won't see their response to you. So what if they try and bait you and other people see it?
This thing could work out well. People being filtered, people filtering, and a few ghost conversations which half the people can't read. What could go wrong 
^^ No I think its important
If I think FomulaNova is continually trolling I ignore him - great.
But he can then go on and on replying to my posts with perhaps defamatory stuff that perhaps I'd like to be aware of.
What about a site sponsor ignoring Mark-Aust as he just has a go at them personally all the time..... then they don't see he is later talking about how they're making dangerous products with child labour and using illegal cancerous materials...? They wanna know that cos its not just childish crap now...
So I think if its bad enough to click 'hide' it should be reciprocal.... and I'd be interested to know if that's the case from the mods..?
I don't really see how it could be made reciprocal, as it it possible to view all seabreeze pages without being logged in as a member.
I think the effectiveness of hiding members is limited, but it may deter trolls as they will not know who is blocking them.
mods - there's a typo on the hide page
It says "you will now see posts from XYZ.........." Instead of "you will not...... "
I agree with Mark, you could miss something if you hide posts, it's not like hiding some persons stuff on facebook as on forum they can be responding to your post. Plenty of business owners/reps post on here.
Hate to say it but this just falls on mods, if enough people report irrelevant etc content then the person should receive notice, reduced posting, suspension & ultimately a ban. & it should raise some mod attention with the volume of posts by individuals.
& it's kinda important, In last 15 years every forum these pests have been on have died, yes there has been decline of forums in general but for sure they have contributed to members walking away. Seabreeze is one of the last english speaking windsurfing forums left.
Select to expand quotemkseven said..
I agree with Mark
Most people do, it is why we only have green thumbs now.
