Ever since the red thumb button was taken away from us here on sea breeze, people like me have lost everything. We can no longer express our feelings and no one else can express there true feelings towards me..
bring back the red thumbs
the red thumb encourages anonymous bullying, better express your feelings with words so the person also understands the reasons of your disappointment
Maybe you're taking the p!ss, but i agree. It could well have stopped the pettiness that has caused the moderators so much grief just of late. people getting a reality check from a jury of their peers before they message laurie with a sob story could well have made them think twice about bothering.
they might get (and see) two green thumbs, but theres 10 others who don't agree with them. They don't get that un-opinionated clip over the ear. and when they get someone who can be bothered to speak up, it just spirals into a spiteful argument and ends in tears.
of course there will always be trolls who don't really give a crap about their red thumbs, but for the larger part..
Select to expand quotepowersloshin said..
the red thumb encourages anonymous bullying, better express your feelings with words so the person also understands the reasons of your disappointment
No offence but i disagree. i'd rather get 5 red thumbs than a half page opinion piece on why im wrong. Red thumbs are not a personal attack.
and there's no one person to respond to, which is how online arguments break out.
How about a red/green scale of -5,-4,-3.-2,-1,+1,+2,+3,+4,+5 to allow for more options
Sounds like a further extension of social media censorship. People should have the freedom to express an opinion in the same way people have the freedom to ignore you if you are rude. Personally, I find it more of an offence when the odd person here uses crude language, but I am not their school teacher or mother to lecture them or take away their toys. Perhaps we need an emoji that looks like a bar a soap. By ticking it we suggest that the language needs some cleaning up.
The amount of social media censorship is wrong because the person censoring assumes that they have a superior moral character. I know that trolls are bad but so are telemarketers and weeds in my garden. How many people criticise the weather bureau, without cause when they are frustrated that there is no wind? Is that comment much the same as a red emoji? If you want to see some really bad language and behaviour then watch some sessions of parliament question time when they go at each other maliciously and with intent. Unfortunately, you can't legislate morality, anyway, it just creates a new class of hypocrites.
[The writer advises that no animals were harmed by the words written above.]
Select to expand quotealbers said..
How about a red/green scale of -5,-4,-3.-2,-1,+1,+2,+3,+4,+5 to allow for more options
And add more dimensions to the anonymised evaluation scales. Things like authority of poster, so when it comes to discussions about board repairs, I'd get 0, MarkOz would get 9. Truthfulness, Humour etc should get rated
Nah, keep it simple with red and green. I could never understand why the red was taken down.
In the German Surf-Forum there is a response system (up and down thump) and a score system (reaction points are counted) and a listings about your seniority in the forum.
This is not prohibiting a Dunning-Kruger-victim like LeeD to post hot air in multiple threads parallel, but every new or unexperienced user knows after one view on his points, what's going on.
But even more helpful is the "ignore function." You can list a poster to "ignore" him and then the system doesn't show his posts anymore for you. Very helpful if you want to read only the discussion about e.g. foiling and not the posts about bragging him about the great summer 1982 on hookipa, for example :-)
That last 'ignore' function would be great. I think we would all choose to ignore posts from the serial forum pest
Laurie is liable if posts are allowed to remain which are of a defamatory nature and someone take offence.
It's not censorship, it's just Laurie trying to avoid ending up in court. Blame the courts for making being admin on a forum or social media site so difficult.
www.australiancommunitymanagers.com.au/blog/social-media-liability-voller-ruling
Select to expand quoteairsail said..
Laurie is liable if posts are allowed to remain which are of a defamatory nature and someone take offence.
It's not censorship, it's just Laurie trying to avoid ending up in court. Blame the courts for making being admin on a forum or social media site so difficult.
www.australiancommunitymanagers.com.au/blog/social-media-liability-voller-ruling
Red thumbs or ignore functions might actually reduce this risk ...
Select to expand quoteDezza said..
That last 'ignore' function would be great. I think we would all choose to ignore posts from the serial forum pest
+1 for ignore function.
Incessant bragging on this forum is tedious and childish.
Perhaps a daily limit on posts might work too.
When I saw the title of this post, I thought really? Some spend way too much time on this site to bicker about this! Let's get to the important stuff, our passion for windsurfing!
I think that people may find this forum helps them to feel connected with people, especially during covid, social isolation is certainly not healthy for most people.
Select to expand quoteazymuth said..Dezza said..
That last 'ignore' function would be great. I think we would all choose to ignore posts from the serial forum pest
+1 for ignore function.
Incessant bragging on this forum is tedious and childish.
Perhaps a daily limit on posts might work too.
As long as we don't have a daily limit on how many times someone can log on 
+1 ... bring back red thumbs
check out how it works on ozbargain.com.au ... limit of 5 negatives (negs) per day.
helps sort out the crap replies from the positive replies.
Select to expand quoteairsail said..
Laurie is liable if posts are allowed to remain which are of a defamatory nature and someone take offence.
It's not censorship, it's just Laurie trying to avoid ending up in court. Blame the courts for making being admin on a forum or social media site so difficult.
www.australiancommunitymanagers.com.au/blog/social-media-liability-voller-ruling
Defamation cases are costly to prosecute so it is rare for ordinary people to pursue justice through the courts. A lot of people threaten to sue but the lawyers fees are way too expensive to go much further. That is why we see actors, rich people and celebrities in courts pursuing damages. They are the only ones who can afford it. As such, I wonder what the risk is for a bunch of salt seasoned windsurfers getting overly precious about a comment they don't like. I don't know of anyone in the community who would act in such a way.
Select to expand quotepowersloshin said..
the red thumb encourages anonymous bullying, better express your feelings with words so the person also understands the reasons of your disappointment
not everyone has time to read endless pages of text.
bad replies need to flagged and hidden, so they dont waste people's time.
Select to expand quoteMarkSSC said..airsail said..
Laurie is liable if posts are allowed to remain which are of a defamatory nature and someone take offence.
It's not censorship, it's just Laurie trying to avoid ending up in court. Blame the courts for making being admin on a forum or social media site so difficult.
www.australiancommunitymanagers.com.au/blog/social-media-liability-voller-ruling
Defamation cases are costly to prosecute so it is rare for ordinary people to pursue justice through the courts. A lot of people threaten to sue but the lawyers fees are way too expensive to go much further. That is why we see actors, rich people and celebrities in courts pursuing damages. They are the only ones who can afford it. As such, I wonder what the risk is for a bunch of salt seasoned windsurfers getting overly precious about a comment they don't like. I don't know of anyone in the community who would act in such a way.
Too many "no win, no fee" lawyers out there and there is now a previous judgement against an administrator.
I'm sure Laurie doesn't want to take the risk.
^^^ especially as the aforementioned person is very well supported by certain interest groups in all his endeavours against the authorities....
Select to expand quoteJohn340 said..
Nah, keep it simple with red and green. I could never understand why the red was taken down.
Oh I can. Trust me.... 
Select to expand quoteJakeNN said..powersloshin said..
the red thumb encourages anonymous bullying, better express your feelings with words so the person also understands the reasons of your disappointment
not everyone has time to read endless pages of text.
bad replies need to flagged and hidden, so they dont waste people's time.
Hiding is a form of censorship. Better to let them post. All we need is a simple method of letting the poster know what we think.
Select to expand quoteJohn340 said..JakeNN said..
not everyone has time to read endless pages of text.
bad replies need to flagged and hidden, so they dont waste people's time.
Hiding is a form of censorship. Better to let them post. All we need is a simple method of letting the poster know what we think.
You can open and expand and read if you want to.
Example here .. you can see the 'compressed / hidden ' replies and expand to read if you feel the need ... scroll through the comments here ... and you can see a few greyed out headings with a button to 'show'.
www.ozbargain.com.au/node/685508
It also encourages users to post valuable replies as they know that pointless points will be flagged and compressed / hidden.
^ that works well on other forums too
or as someone else suggested when this topic came up a while ago, if reds are brought back, hows about allowing everyone see who thumbed up/down? At least the lack of anonymity might prevent issues.
i can't see why someone can't just reply and say "i don't agree or like it because xyz"?
Select to expand quotet36 said..
This is not prohibiting a Dunning-Kruger-victim like LeeD to post hot air in multiple threads parallel, but every new or unexperienced user knows after one view on his points, what's going on.
Suspension is the best solution for people like this, which is what appears to have happened.
Vote no red thumbs from me, too many platforms for anonymous click-bait opinions in the world already. After all, the worst of all opinion is public opinion.
Green only is so dumb and precious.
so some idiot post something stupid, then five other idiots like it. Then at a glance that stupid comment appears as though it has popular support but the truth is 99% of people think have the opposite view of it.
it's just green washing BS
And a true representation of popular view only works if it's anonymous. If your post get red thumbed that's a cue to that maybe there's an alternate view out there.
the worlds is soft enough, suck it up buttercups
Select to expand quotetbwonder said..t36 said..
This is not prohibiting a Dunning-Kruger-victim like LeeD to post hot air in multiple threads parallel, but every new or unexperienced user knows after one view on his points, what's going on.
Suspension is the best solution for people like this, which is what appears to have happened.
Alleluia, I think you might be right. I wonder how long for?
