wind foil boards (new) design

Hello, that is an interesting topic. I see two point of view, one related to general windfoiling, so not associated to competing , the other from a performance perspective.
Probably creating a system with a foil in front of the mast base could be more stable, but less manouverable I think, though for pleasure foiling I like the system as it is; too much of auto pilot would rouin that magic search of balance that foiling is all about. should not be needed to uphaul the sail, the perfect board would have the less nose possible and this makes the system more compact and 'on top of the foil', which for freeriding and having fun is all we need I guess; the less bulky equipment we need the better to me, more freedom, more playfullness. Moreover another gap I see in these days windfoiling is wind range, IQ sails can handle from 6-8 knts to 30 knots with 9 sqm sail, I was used to get in crysis with a 5.7 wave sail into 15-16 knt of wind, we shall do better than that, coming ashore to change sail is an hassle for foling boards..maybe we need to re-discover adjustable outhaul systems, they may enlarge that range a lot.

Select to expand quote

PhilUK said..

w100 said..

So why don't design new different boards placing the foil somewhere else if this helps?

They do. The box is nearer the back of the board. Well, at least it is on my AHD freerace, 5cm from the back of the board.

Or on the starboard race boards the box is over 20cm from the tail

Select to expand quote

w100 said..
Don't know if this topic has been discussed elsewhere. If it was i'm sorry...

...So why don't design new different boards placing the foil somewhere else if this helps?

This has been discussed before a few times. In short, there have been attempts to put the foil elsewhere but the answer keeps coming back that where the foil is now is where it seems to work best for a number of reasons including how the board behaves while still in the water, at take off and as mentioned above, how the entire package, board and foil, behave in the air.

As for the Starboard boards mentioned above, the foil is still relatively in the same place vis-a-vis the straps ie the relationship between the rider, foil and mast is still pretty similar. The big difference being the tail above the water being extended to provide a smoother release for air coming off the back of the board. For recreational riding, I'm pretty sure the difference is minor to nil. For racing, since I spend a lot of time in the cycling world where even the drag of (edit) cables are considered so that of harness lines at 30 kts would be consequential, I imagine the small things do add up even if seemingly minor.

"The board is shaped like a water drop from the nose to the tail, reducing the drag from the water while also increasing aerodynamic efficicency. As a result, the board is very slippery and stable in the air."

What brand and type board is this?

Select to expand quote

barthbb said..
What brand and type board is this?

It is one of my other skills...

www.free-ride-addicted.fr/shape/

I would imagine with that bottom shape it would be quite tippy....?

Current downwinder wing foil and SUP boards are long and narrow with displacement hulls, so the theory works. A dirty great big foil underneath also helps with stability.

Mark, I think the IQ and Patrik Foil Ones are flat because they are nearly 1metre wide.

Select to expand quote

Mark _australia said..
Yup too hard to uphaul and then been trying not to say it but I really don't get it, flat is fast and low drag. Round is sucky.
In displacement mode a rounded bottom can be less drag but we want it to ride up out of displacement - granted we are not trying to achieve planing speed but still don't want a sucky round bottom.

Look at IQ and Patrik FoilOne.

I don't think this is quite true... Round rockers are sticky, yes... but rail to rail may be different... think about it in a static sense. Imagine a pc of plywood lying flat on the water there is lifting eye in the middle & you measure the force required to lift it out of the water. Now you have a semi cylindrical(half round) shape with the same surface area touching the water. Given they are the same weight with the same surface area which will take the least force to leave the water vertically? I think given sub planing speeds the displacement hull may release easier.... just a thought...

Select to expand quote

Mark _australia said..
So why do i have a wing board that flies earlier than any other with many testers back to back with similar boards
Like two guys identical one gear can't even fly and on my flat board design they can? Swap over riders and same deal
Plus then touchdowns fly up again effortlessly which is a big one
Not theorists here - real world testing

People removing silly bevels and improve their board takeoff threshold greatly - real world experience

WS foil board likewise

Not saying round cant work but i am having people rave about early takeoff with flat, and they've used many boards.

And if round is so great why is nobody making race boards like that? 1m wide or otherwise.....

Maybe it depends on the circumstances. Likewise I have seen back to back testing.Wingers getting up on foil using long narrow round bottomed(but flat rockered) Downwind boards on a wing size they could never get on foil with their traditional boards. Maybe it is a matter of available power. The downwind style boards seem to be able to generate the speed needed to release quickly with less power, whereas a short flat board like you are espousing may take off very quickly given enough power.... just a thought. Here this is playing out over & over with people switching to downwind boards for lightwind winging. I think there's something to be learned there...

Take off depends among other things on technique, with cutouts or downwinder boards depend mainly on speed for take off, my board is 172*80 with large bevels, no cut out, but I don't see anyone taking off before me, and I do usually use smaller sail than the rest. My technique relays mainly on pumping and only minimal forward drive. Friend of mine getting a downwinder board with mast track + Gong Sirus 186(xxxl), I will report on findings in a couple of months

The extended tail of the Starboard is for aero rather than hydro reasons - to have better airflow off the tail. That's why all the other dimensions vis-a-vis the foil box are conventional.

"Further aerodynamic features include a aero convex deck and a smooth exit at the tail to reduce high-speed drag as much as possible. " - windsurf.star-board.com/windfoiling-boards/freeride-racing-windfoil-boards/x-15-foil-slalom-windfoil-board/

I agree, the cutouts of the Severne are similar to Phantom, FMX, and others.

Board shape design in mostly guided by unproven theories, very limited testing, confirmation bias, and hype. Different levels of experience and background complicate things further - even more so for winging, where newbies may come from windsurfing, kiting, prone surfing, wakeboarding, or have no water sports experience at all.

Race boards in windfoiling seems quite similar to each other - very wide for early planing, sharp edges, and pretty significant tail cutouts. But in wing racing, it seems many racers are using downwind boards.

I'd theorize that downwind shapes work for foiling if you are using a relatively powerful but efficient foil - something like a 100 cm wide high aspect foil. With limited power, the downwind board shape will pick up an extra couple of knots due to longer board length and a lower drag coefficient. A fat beginner foil would counteract that with lots of drag, but might still work somewhat if it generates enough lift at low speed. But displacement speeds are limited, even for longer "wave piercing" displacement hulls, so a foil that's to small will not get up to high enough speed to generate the required lift. Such a foil will require a planing hull to overcoming the displacement speed limit.

So if you compare different board shapes in a test, it's quite important to take the conditions and foil type into consideration. In winging, you have the additional option to direct some of the "sail" power upward, which basically reduces the lift and therefore speed required for take-off. In GWA wing races, the requirement of the flagging/pumping leg limits how small a foil racers can use, which also favors a downwind hull shape. Another thing that's absent in winging is the roll momentum from the rig and mast foot, which requires wider tails to counter-act it for stable rides.

Phantom Infinite

Select to expand quote

dimacced said..

azymuth said..

boardsurfr said..
Another thing that's absent in winging is the roll momentum from the rig and mast foot, which requires wider tails to counter-act it for stable rides.

That's interesting - I feel it with smaller extreme HA wings.
Can you explain the roll forces that are unique to windfoiling please

I personally think momentum is there in both winging and windfoil, and is given by the rider body connecting sail to board transferring with his own body the force from the wing/sail to the board, and the hole si getting a wind force on the center of effort which is at a certain eight respect to the board, so the rider needs to counterbalance by leaning out and getting COG aside from vertical to get an opposite and equal in size momentum in search for equilibrium.
the only difference is that in winging the sail is not connected to the center of the board and you can move it out on the opposite rail, this you can't do in windfoiling since UJ is in the middle and fix, so the stance may be dirrent, in any case sail upright for maximum trust and body leaned outward farest away possible from the sail to counteract momentum...that is why so long lines on windfoil race.

We don't really experience rig induced roll moments in wind foiling, nor would a wing. The Americas cup boats and GP 50s do, as their rig is stayed to the boat. That's why they have their foils set much further forward, and outboard on the leeward side, to counteract the roll moment.

I believe what he's getting at is that wind foilers have to "share" the board platform with their rig, which means we generally need to be outboard when we're up at speed. Moving your feet away from the centreline means you lose some leverage over a foil that exceeds the board width. Hence the wider boards, so we can maintain leverage over the foil when we're outboard. Wing foilers don't really have their feet too far away from the centreline of the board, so roll moment is easier to manipulate.

Select to expand quote

Subsonic said..

dimacced said..

azymuth said..

boardsurfr said..
Another thing that's absent in winging is the roll momentum from the rig and mast foot, which requires wider tails to counter-act it for stable rides.

That's interesting - I feel it with smaller extreme HA wings.
Can you explain the roll forces that are unique to windfoiling please

I personally think momentum is there in both winging and windfoil, and is given by the rider body connecting sail to board transferring with his own body the force from the wing/sail to the board, and the hole si getting a wind force on the center of effort which is at a certain eight respect to the board, so the rider needs to counterbalance by leaning out and getting COG aside from vertical to get an opposite and equal in size momentum in search for equilibrium.
the only difference is that in winging the sail is not connected to the center of the board and you can move it out on the opposite rail, this you can't do in windfoiling since UJ is in the middle and fix, so the stance may be dirrent, in any case sail upright for maximum trust and body leaned outward farest away possible from the sail to counteract momentum...that is why so long lines on windfoil race.

We don't really experience rig induced roll moments in wind foiling, nor would a wing. The Americas cup boats and GP 50s do, as their rig is stayed to the boat. That's why they have their foils set much further forward, and outboard on the leeward side, to counteract the roll moment.

I believe what he's getting at is that wind foilers have to "share" the board platform with their rig, which means we generally need to be outboard when we're up at speed. Moving your feet away from the centreline means you lose some leverage over a foil that exceeds the board width. Hence the wider boards, so we can maintain leverage over the foil when we're outboard. Wing foilers don't really have their feet too far away from the centreline of the board, so roll moment is easier to manipulate.

I am not sure wether I got your point correctly. On foiling we are subject to torque generated by the sail, it is our body that connects the force source (sail) to the board, if you let the sail go it will fall downwind. We do not perceive that much force due to the poor power our sails/wing generates and the very low drag the foil has. Should you take off the foil and do windsurfing instead, immediately consequences are, more drag, so more sail needed, and more torque generated and you need to lean much more outboard to compensate and you perceive more clearly that your body is the connector and force, torque transfer to the board.
As a matter of fact the sail surface and efficiency of an america's cup boat is enormously different, so that they are much more efficient and get 4 times faster than wind speed, while on foiling we get almost as fast as the wind or slightly above 1,4-1,6 times the wind in the best conditions (racers with big sails and very small foil).
So less power generated =less torque, but still torque is there both in winging and windfoiling.
Should leverage being needed to compensate for torque generated by the foil underneath we have this both in winging and windfoiling alike, though wing foilers stay quite centered on the board while windfoilers need some width to counteract that.
While this is generally true, some windfoilers these days claim they feel better with straps located more towards the center of the board, I think the difference is the kind of riding you want to do: should you go faster with more power you may need leverage, and the balance you get is totally different (lean out much, longer fuselage for more power and upwind ability, more sail cloth, more board width), should you go for a more manoeuver oriented ride, you get a totaly different set up, that very much resemble the wing one (Balz muller riding the Pegasus 108 that is 60 cm wide with very mych centered straps).
I start believing that wingers need less forces to get moving, so that even poor source of pure as the wings are are able to let them go; and less forces means difenet stance on the board.

I am afraid many of the difference in stance are coming from our eritage, we have been windsurfers before getting into windfoiling so we have that kind of stance engrained, wingfoilers come from many different sports, some from kiting and they have wider stances, some from windsurfing and they tend to use the wing as a sail...there is a component of physical motor patterns we are somehow linked to and have diffciculties in abandoning. Experimenting is the only thing we can do to explore and understand.