Last of the Ukrainian factory production? Absolutely fabulous shape & I think they got the length & deck contour spot on. Favourite size?
So I finally decided on the FMX 178LR 91 board. A few thoughts about this outcome
My old FMX has given me a great couple of years service but it has certainly seen better days. All reasonable offers considered. $$$
Most of our foiling races are in lighter winds with the switch to 7.7 and fin at around 20 knots. My 7.0 foil sail still feels comfortable on 91 and since the 85 isn't available for 6-9 months I'll make the most of the familiar size board. 6.0m foil race sails are also as rare as 81cm boards!
Looking at the 85 Veloce (free ride) board over the top of the 91, 2cm either side wasn't really enough of a step down to worry. For a small foil board I'd probably want to go under 80cm. If an 85 FMX or equivalent was available I'd probably have chosen this size instead. But the 81 starts to get a bit to small for lighter wind days. I assume the smaller size would be fine in the air with say an 8.0 or even 9.0, but 140L vs 180L makes takeoff that little bit harder.
30+ knot speed runs will have the advantage of new low drag nose shape so I'm sure they will be easier.
It's cheaper than a race car!
91 was in stock!
thanks Remi at theWindSurfingShed.
I also got the FMX 178 91 board, mine was prior years model which apparently changed only slightly (218 cm 217 cm). I have been using SB Freeride 150 lt with 1000/800 IQ foil -255 and I found the footstraps and sail mast track positioned better than the SB freeride board. The board is significantly lighter than many other boards of similar size. Shape, cut out and paint is excellent for lifting as it is better than SB freeride as FMX claim that the paint also contributes for not sticking to the water. I definetely feel the difference. Despite the board is wider (91 cm 85 cm), I found the run is more stable. Installation of footstraps screws required lots of power pushing and I found out lubricant on the screws were helpful. My only difficulty was fitting the IQfoil to the tuttle box and the rake was 3-4 degrees off. I am now putting as minimum torque on the front screw of the mast until I get my mast shim to adjust. Did you have any problem fitting the mast to the tuttlebox?
Hi everyone,
just got an email from a customer asking me to reply on this thread...
There is a lot behind designs... - have fun reading
!
Cutouts:
1. Slalom/Speed foilers rake their foil mast up to 4? to prevent crashing when touch down at high speeds. This means that the front wing points down when just floating and makes it very difficult to just increase board speed and take off. The much bigger cutouts sink the tail so the front wing is back on a normal angle of attack - not more angle. For Freeride foiling the masts are raked around 0?-2? and therefore need smaller cutouts. With big cutouts the tail would sink to much and give the front wing to much angle of attack which again makes it harder to take off - either the board shoots up to much or/and the front wing stalls.
2. The big cutouts have much less drag when touch down but important are also the angles coming off the rail and it need to be enough so the water can not follow the surface otherwise it is "sucking" and creates lot of drag.
3. An other important detail for early take off, acceleration, top speed and less resistance when touch down is to have sharp edges where the water flows off. Tuckeds have lots of advantages but definitely not in the last 200-300mm off the tail - even 1mm round has only negative influence except the purpose is to reduce planing, acceleration and speed. For entry level Prone-Foilers it helps to be connected with the wave/white-water until the rider is standing on the board and then pump and take-off. If the prone-foil board is fast with good acceleration the rider need to get up quicker otherwise the board takes off while the riders is still on his belly.
4. Similar to point 3) rockered tail shapes also change how the board floats/planes and helps changing the angle of attack of the front wing when pushing on the tail. But rocker is definitely the enemy for planing/acceleration and top speed and even 3mm more rocker on a small wave board tail feels like a lot and reduces planing, acceleration and speed significantly. Most wing boards have lots of rocker even 50mm and the planning, take off and touch down suffers a lot. Not to mix up with a "tail-kick" (starts behind the fin box and is never more then 2mm) which helps to reduce the wetted surface in the front of the board and increases a lot of speed but looses stability/control in stronger wind and chop.
5. Again similar to point 3 & 4) tapered outline curves help reducing tail width and volume to sink the tail but in flight mode the board is angled down to the upwind rail and makes the curved rail like an extrem rocker and sucks up the water when touch down and creates much more drag. At high speed touch downs it sometimes feels you get pulled to the front out of the straps.
6. Straight outlines feel like a catamaran hull when touching down and re-bounce easier but if the rail is to long it will be harder to "re-bounce" back up and the back of the board/rail will push/hold the board nose down.
There is more but lets say those are the main points for cutouts ![]()
Aerodynamics:
1. "With foiling the board is not so important as it flies" - I hear that a lot and makes my job as a shaper useless -right? Well, how many sailors can not get a stable run and blame the foil setup or the sail? How many test their setup all over the place - straps and mast-track back and forward, longer and shorter fuse, more or less tail wing lift, more or less mast rake, etc., etc. Also with the sail, t much power in the head pushes the board nose down? To much backhand pressure = to much back foot pressure lifts the board nose? Ever though about that Fin-Windsurfing likes the board slightly onto the leeward rail and get wind under the board to get the "fly over the chop effect" but foiling has the upwind rail lower and the wind is pushing onto the deck surface? Take your bicycle, ride 10km/h and hold a 1m2 big 3mm ply-wood into the air and feel what happens ![]()
2. To reduce as much possible wind-attack surface the foil-board need to be much shorter then a fin-board. But not to short as the nose will dig at high speed touch downs and to just lift the scoop will negatively effect the planing and the aerodynamics of the "frontal wind". The floating stability of Foil-boards is much better then Fin-boards as the foil feels like a stable anchor. So more about 200-300mm shorter then fin-boards seems to work well.
3. Board width depends on the leverage over the foil. With 1000 front wing a 1m wide board feels great but with 350 front wing the rider has to much leverage and "over-rolls" the board to the upwind side and need to compensate with sailing technique. At the moment PWA riders use tiny front wings but more forward with the same fuse size to still get enough lift for planning.
4. Deck concave's give stiffness and lower the mast-track position for more control. But concave's on the deck feel like a spoon catching the wind and push the board down. A lower mast-track feels more controllable and does not catch so muh wind but the water needs to flow out and the edges are more fragile while stepping on them which makes depth and size critical as well. A convex deck also gives stiffness and let the wind flow over it better. The deck shape is also important in the tail area and the flatter the easier the jibes. Concave / convex are mostly annoying when pumping, jibing even for worldcup stars.
5. Thin rails feel like a sheet in the wind and sink / suck water when touch down - thicker rails feel more like a ball in the wind and float / re-bounce better when touch down. Of course with convex deck and big rails the volume distribution and board weight need to be considered.
6. Angled deck/rail stands give better connection under the foot i.e. more control but it is harder to move the foot in and out of the strap when jibing. In general Freeride boards have flatter decks as jibing is more important then speed.
Construction / Prices / Warranty:
Which factory does not really matter as every brand has the choice of materials and constructions in any factory. If something is not well built the only reason is to cut costs to be able and have more money for marketing... ??
Prices vary if costs are cut and if a brand sales direct or trough a distribution network and with this comes as well the service and warranty handling.
Bottom line is too either care about price, believe in marketing and results or know what you are buying... ![]()
Cheers,
Patrik
Thanks Patrick for the shape details and reasoning, fascinating! It all makes sense when you present it as you did.
I go back to the boot show video where you explained the frontal aerodynamics of the board nose, this was instrumental in my decision on which board to purchase. But then in 2020 covid supply issues Patrick were sold out/ not available in USA, Phantom were sold out, had to go with Exocet RF81 Carbon as was available, and it incorporates many of the same design ideas found in your boards,
ie aerodynamic nose design, flat deck, parallel vertical rails, and cut out shapes. But my next board will be Airinside Foil, for ultralight windfoiling. Can you give any info on the next production on the Airinside Foilboards, and where will the production be made?
Great info Patrik.
careful you don't give too much away or we will all start making our own boards. ????

www.instagram.com/p/Cbg6EyZPrTX/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
Aerodynamics:
Cheers,
Patrik
I'm amazed at how well flight can be controlled with weight shift. But wouldn't a flap operated by a twist grip on the boom be faster response and easier? The complication of getting linkages for a below water flap puts it out of the question. Would it be easier to get an airside spoiler up front working for fast-response height control.
@Phil which one do you use for foil slalom below 10 knots?
FMX Hyperion
Np Evo12 9,0 or Flight II 9,0/10,0
Phantom Iris R 730/100/200 or 250 MK2
Hi everyone,
just got an email from a customer asking me to reply on this thread...
There is a lot behind designs... - have fun reading
!
Cutouts:
1. Slalom/Speed foilers rake their foil mast up to 4? to prevent crashing when touch down at high speeds. This means that the front wing points down when just floating and makes it very difficult to just increase board speed and take off. The much bigger cutouts sink the tail so the front wing is back on a normal angle of attack - not more angle. For Freeride foiling the masts are raked around 0?-2? and therefore need smaller cutouts. With big cutouts the tail would sink to much and give the front wing to much angle of attack which again makes it harder to take off - either the board shoots up to much or/and the front wing stalls.
2. The big cutouts have much less drag when touch down but important are also the angles coming off the rail and it need to be enough so the water can not follow the surface otherwise it is "sucking" and creates lot of drag.
3. An other important detail for early take off, acceleration, top speed and less resistance when touch down is to have sharp edges where the water flows off. Tuckeds have lots of advantages but definitely not in the last 200-300mm off the tail - even 1mm round has only negative influence except the purpose is to reduce planing, acceleration and speed. For entry level Prone-Foilers it helps to be connected with the wave/white-water until the rider is standing on the board and then pump and take-off. If the prone-foil board is fast with good acceleration the rider need to get up quicker otherwise the board takes off while the riders is still on his belly.
4. Similar to point 3) rockered tail shapes also change how the board floats/planes and helps changing the angle of attack of the front wing when pushing on the tail. But rocker is definitely the enemy for planing/acceleration and top speed and even 3mm more rocker on a small wave board tail feels like a lot and reduces planing, acceleration and speed significantly. Most wing boards have lots of rocker even 50mm and the planning, take off and touch down suffers a lot. Not to mix up with a "tail-kick" (starts behind the fin box and is never more then 2mm) which helps to reduce the wetted surface in the front of the board and increases a lot of speed but looses stability/control in stronger wind and chop.
5. Again similar to point 3 & 4) tapered outline curves help reducing tail width and volume to sink the tail but in flight mode the board is angled down to the upwind rail and makes the curved rail like an extrem rocker and sucks up the water when touch down and creates much more drag. At high speed touch downs it sometimes feels you get pulled to the front out of the straps.
6. Straight outlines feel like a catamaran hull when touching down and re-bounce easier but if the rail is to long it will be harder to "re-bounce" back up and the back of the board/rail will push/hold the board nose down.
There is more but lets say those are the main points for cutouts ![]()
Aerodynamics:
1. "With foiling the board is not so important as it flies" - I hear that a lot and makes my job as a shaper useless -right? Well, how many sailors can not get a stable run and blame the foil setup or the sail? How many test their setup all over the place - straps and mast-track back and forward, longer and shorter fuse, more or less tail wing lift, more or less mast rake, etc., etc. Also with the sail, t much power in the head pushes the board nose down? To much backhand pressure = to much back foot pressure lifts the board nose? Ever though about that Fin-Windsurfing likes the board slightly onto the leeward rail and get wind under the board to get the "fly over the chop effect" but foiling has the upwind rail lower and the wind is pushing onto the deck surface? Take your bicycle, ride 10km/h and hold a 1m2 big 3mm ply-wood into the air and feel what happens ![]()
2. To reduce as much possible wind-attack surface the foil-board need to be much shorter then a fin-board. But not to short as the nose will dig at high speed touch downs and to just lift the scoop will negatively effect the planing and the aerodynamics of the "frontal wind". The floating stability of Foil-boards is much better then Fin-boards as the foil feels like a stable anchor. So more about 200-300mm shorter then fin-boards seems to work well.
3. Board width depends on the leverage over the foil. With 1000 front wing a 1m wide board feels great but with 350 front wing the rider has to much leverage and "over-rolls" the board to the upwind side and need to compensate with sailing technique. At the moment PWA riders use tiny front wings but more forward with the same fuse size to still get enough lift for planning.
4. Deck concave's give stiffness and lower the mast-track position for more control. But concave's on the deck feel like a spoon catching the wind and push the board down. A lower mast-track feels more controllable and does not catch so muh wind but the water needs to flow out and the edges are more fragile while stepping on them which makes depth and size critical as well. A convex deck also gives stiffness and let the wind flow over it better. The deck shape is also important in the tail area and the flatter the easier the jibes. Concave / convex are mostly annoying when pumping, jibing even for worldcup stars.
5. Thin rails feel like a sheet in the wind and sink / suck water when touch down - thicker rails feel more like a ball in the wind and float / re-bounce better when touch down. Of course with convex deck and big rails the volume distribution and board weight need to be considered.
6. Angled deck/rail stands give better connection under the foot i.e. more control but it is harder to move the foot in and out of the strap when jibing. In general Freeride boards have flatter decks as jibing is more important then speed.
Construction / Prices / Warranty:
Which factory does not really matter as every brand has the choice of materials and constructions in any factory. If something is not well built the only reason is to cut costs to be able and have more money for marketing... ??
Prices vary if costs are cut and if a brand sales direct or trough a distribution network and with this comes as well the service and warranty handling.
Bottom line is too either care about price, believe in marketing and results or know what you are buying... ![]()
Cheers,
Patrik
Dear Patrik, thank you very much for your explanations.
I have copied them for further discussions and awareness making into Totti's forum.
with my best wishes, Boris
Aerodynamics:
Cheers,
Patrik
I'm amazed at how well flight can be controlled with weight shift. But wouldn't a flap operated by a twist grip on the boom be faster response and easier? The complication of getting linkages for a below water flap puts it out of the question. Would it be easier to get an airside spoiler up front working for fast-response height control.
fully agree and tested quite a bit of this during my times at f2. but there are a few problems...- crashes, catapults, how to put it in the boardbag, how to transport it without damaging - on the roof rack tightening down with straps, injuries when crashing, warranty claims, production costs,... - after all it was a no-go...
Hi everyone,
just got an email from a customer asking me to reply on this thread...
There is a lot behind designs... - have fun reading
!
Cutouts:
1. Slalom/Speed foilers rake their foil mast up to 4? to prevent crashing when touch down at high speeds. This means that the front wing points down when just floating and makes it very difficult to just increase board speed and take off. The much bigger cutouts sink the tail so the front wing is back on a normal angle of attack - not more angle. For Freeride foiling the masts are raked around 0?-2? and therefore need smaller cutouts. With big cutouts the tail would sink to much and give the front wing to much angle of attack which again makes it harder to take off - either the board shoots up to much or/and the front wing stalls.
2. The big cutouts have much less drag when touch down but important are also the angles coming off the rail and it need to be enough so the water can not follow the surface otherwise it is "sucking" and creates lot of drag.
3. An other important detail for early take off, acceleration, top speed and less resistance when touch down is to have sharp edges where the water flows off. Tuckeds have lots of advantages but definitely not in the last 200-300mm off the tail - even 1mm round has only negative influence except the purpose is to reduce planing, acceleration and speed. For entry level Prone-Foilers it helps to be connected with the wave/white-water until the rider is standing on the board and then pump and take-off. If the prone-foil board is fast with good acceleration the rider need to get up quicker otherwise the board takes off while the riders is still on his belly.
4. Similar to point 3) rockered tail shapes also change how the board floats/planes and helps changing the angle of attack of the front wing when pushing on the tail. But rocker is definitely the enemy for planing/acceleration and top speed and even 3mm more rocker on a small wave board tail feels like a lot and reduces planing, acceleration and speed significantly. Most wing boards have lots of rocker even 50mm and the planning, take off and touch down suffers a lot. Not to mix up with a "tail-kick" (starts behind the fin box and is never more then 2mm) which helps to reduce the wetted surface in the front of the board and increases a lot of speed but looses stability/control in stronger wind and chop.
5. Again similar to point 3 & 4) tapered outline curves help reducing tail width and volume to sink the tail but in flight mode the board is angled down to the upwind rail and makes the curved rail like an extrem rocker and sucks up the water when touch down and creates much more drag. At high speed touch downs it sometimes feels you get pulled to the front out of the straps.
6. Straight outlines feel like a catamaran hull when touching down and re-bounce easier but if the rail is to long it will be harder to "re-bounce" back up and the back of the board/rail will push/hold the board nose down.
There is more but lets say those are the main points for cutouts ![]()
Aerodynamics:
1. "With foiling the board is not so important as it flies" - I hear that a lot and makes my job as a shaper useless -right? Well, how many sailors can not get a stable run and blame the foil setup or the sail? How many test their setup all over the place - straps and mast-track back and forward, longer and shorter fuse, more or less tail wing lift, more or less mast rake, etc., etc. Also with the sail, t much power in the head pushes the board nose down? To much backhand pressure = to much back foot pressure lifts the board nose? Ever though about that Fin-Windsurfing likes the board slightly onto the leeward rail and get wind under the board to get the "fly over the chop effect" but foiling has the upwind rail lower and the wind is pushing onto the deck surface? Take your bicycle, ride 10km/h and hold a 1m2 big 3mm ply-wood into the air and feel what happens ![]()
2. To reduce as much possible wind-attack surface the foil-board need to be much shorter then a fin-board. But not to short as the nose will dig at high speed touch downs and to just lift the scoop will negatively effect the planing and the aerodynamics of the "frontal wind". The floating stability of Foil-boards is much better then Fin-boards as the foil feels like a stable anchor. So more about 200-300mm shorter then fin-boards seems to work well.
3. Board width depends on the leverage over the foil. With 1000 front wing a 1m wide board feels great but with 350 front wing the rider has to much leverage and "over-rolls" the board to the upwind side and need to compensate with sailing technique. At the moment PWA riders use tiny front wings but more forward with the same fuse size to still get enough lift for planning.
4. Deck concave's give stiffness and lower the mast-track position for more control. But concave's on the deck feel like a spoon catching the wind and push the board down. A lower mast-track feels more controllable and does not catch so muh wind but the water needs to flow out and the edges are more fragile while stepping on them which makes depth and size critical as well. A convex deck also gives stiffness and let the wind flow over it better. The deck shape is also important in the tail area and the flatter the easier the jibes. Concave / convex are mostly annoying when pumping, jibing even for worldcup stars.
5. Thin rails feel like a sheet in the wind and sink / suck water when touch down - thicker rails feel more like a ball in the wind and float / re-bounce better when touch down. Of course with convex deck and big rails the volume distribution and board weight need to be considered.
6. Angled deck/rail stands give better connection under the foot i.e. more control but it is harder to move the foot in and out of the strap when jibing. In general Freeride boards have flatter decks as jibing is more important then speed.
Construction / Prices / Warranty:
Which factory does not really matter as every brand has the choice of materials and constructions in any factory. If something is not well built the only reason is to cut costs to be able and have more money for marketing... ??
Prices vary if costs are cut and if a brand sales direct or trough a distribution network and with this comes as well the service and warranty handling.
Bottom line is too either care about price, believe in marketing and results or know what you are buying... ![]()
Cheers,
Patrik
Thanks for this great info. I have the Patrik 145 foilride(2021), and is my best choice for foil slalom, even in high wind conditions. Faster as my last Starboard 150 freeride. I use from 7-8 knots with Starboard evo 725 front wing with 95 fuselage, with 8.0 Loftsails Skyblade. I use not for upwind-downwind, exclusive for slalom foiling. With 650 and 575 front wings its very fun with higher winds. I little bit more nervous horizontally than my older Starboard.
Saludos!