Peer-reviewed Medical Journals... that's what actual medical doctors and researchers read and publish in. You remember, the the real doctors that treated your mangled leg and made sure you didn't die of sepsis by using scientifically researched and evaluated "Big Pharma" antibiotics published in, you guessed it, peer-reviewed scientific literature. You must be the least appreciative patient in Australia.
Select to expand quoteD3 said..
We don't instantly dismiss her evidence. In fact, your so called MSM has reported pretty accurately on the number of people who unfortunately suffered severe adverse events after vaccination. Just like with OK, we don't dismiss or belittle what happened to them just because it's rare.
But we don't see stories like hers as very good evidence supporting your claim that such events and stories are extremely common, or that they are being suppressed.
The side effects are not rare - that's the LIE you bought.
Nearly all the testimony from the public and the thousands of medics who speak out are suppressed by the MSM.
Rare - nothing could possibly be further than the truth.
Select to expand quotePcdefender said..
Rare - nothing could possibly be further than the truth.
True... serious side effects are extremely rare.
Select to expand quotePcdefender said..
Nearly all the testimony from the public and the thousands of medics who speak out are suppressed by the MSM.
I suppose what i wrote above is also not true?
Select to expand quoteremery said..Pcdefender said..
Rare - nothing could possibly be further than the truth.
True... serious side effects are extremely rare.
You're only correct because the AMA doesn't consider years of chest pain serious. Didn't spend a night in hospital, not serious. Didn't miss work, not serious. The bar for 'serious' is quite high, certainly a lot higher than the bar for 'safe and effective'
So, PC. Where are all the people with serious adverse reactions?
How do you know about them?
How many do you know of?
Edit: If this Grand Conspiracy to squash all reports of adverse events actually exists? Why are you able to find out about them? Surely they'd be able to hide the evidence better than that?
Select to expand quotepsychojoe said..
You're only correct because the AMA doesn't consider years of chest pain serious. Didn't spend a night in hospital, not serious. Didn't miss work, not serious. The bar for 'serious' is quite high, certainly a lot higher than the bar for 'safe and effective'
To be fair, I'd be hard pressed believing someone was suffering from a serious condition if it was not seriously affecting their ability to function.
Not saying that something has to result in hospitalisation to have a significant impact on someone's ability to live Day to Day. But I'd need a bit more information before I'd understand why it should be compared with a condition that did result in hospitalisation or affects someones ability to work etc.
Select to expand quoteD3 said..
So, PC. Where are all the people with serious adverse reactions?
Well, there's a hundred and forty thousand reports of adverse reactions reported to the TGA right here in Australia.
The ones who spent their time filling in the reports, seemingly averaging over an hour for each report they are mostly liars according to you.
I don't think so, but you are entitled to your theory.
Select to expand quotePcdefender said..D3 said..
So, PC. Where are all the people with serious adverse reactions?
Well, there's a hundred and forty thousand reports of adverse reactions reported to the TGA right here in Australia.
The ones who spent their time filling in the reports, seemingly averaging over an hour for each report they are mostly liars according to you.
I don't think so, but you are entitled to your theory.
Wait, you mean the 140,000 reports that are readily available and actually have been mentioned in MSM?
Where's the suppression?
And where'd you get the idea I think they're lying?
I just don't think 0.2% is particularly common
They mention a national scandal a few times and then still push the vax.
Nothing to see here just move on.
Select to expand quotePcdefender said..
Well, there's a hundred and forty thousand reports of adverse reactions reported to the TGA right here in Australia.
The ones who spent their time filling in the reports, seemingly averaging over an hour for each report they are mostly liars according to you.
I don't think so, but you are entitled to your theory.
Have you filled in an adverse reaction report? I have and it took 20 minutes. Individuals can report several adverse reactions (sore arm, sore joints, fatigue... none serious). But you continue to make stuff up. You can't even be bothered reading the TGA explanation of how their data should be used. You are a liar.
Getting personal AGAIN.
I do take the time to listen to medics and according to them it takes half an hour to up to four hours to fill in a covid side effect report depending on your computer skills etc.
My point precisely. You make claims without investigation. I made an adverse event report of three reactions so I could see what the process involved and then made informed comment. The minor reactions I reported were factual. You just make stuff up.
The flue almost disappeared because most intelligent people were following guidelines and mandates. Social distancing, hand washing, masking... Things that medical prosessionals do to minimise spread if infection. The same reasons you didn't get sepsis and die.
Japan's most senior cancer doctor: COVID shots are 'essentially murder' - LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)
I remember that party the elite had at a racecourse in England at the height of the fear campaign. One rule for them.
Let us never forget the lies.
Select to expand quotePcdefender said..
Japan's most senior cancer doctor: COVID shots are 'essentially murder' - LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)
I remember that party the elite had at a racecourse in England at the height of the fear campaign. One rule for them.
Let us never forget the lies.
You are a liar.
Hiroki Kino****a, from MHLW's (Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare) Pharmaceutical Safety Division, said in an email: "Currently, no causal relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and death has been confirmed under the Suspected Adverse Reactions Reporting System."
You did not bother to take the time to listen to his interview.
I am surprised that the mods on here continue to put up with your constant abuse.
Select to expand quotePcdefender said..
You did not bother to take the time to listen to his interview.
I am surprised that the mods on here continue to put up your constant abuse.
Maybe they agree with him? I don't know, but I suspect that they would be happier without any of this discussion.
Is it abuse if you were a liar and he called you one? I personally don't think you are one, but I don't think you care about any point of view other than your own.
Probably like most of us.
How did the Elite have a party at a racecourse without the Illuminati knowing it was on? Did they endorse it? Did they attend it? We need to know!
Edit: I just looked at that site you mentioned, and its no wonder you believe this stuff. That's all it peddles.
'Listen to his video'? He speaks Japanese. I don't understand Japanese. I guess I would have to read the subtitles, but how do I know its not a conspiracy and someone has put in the wrong subtitles and he is saying something different? 
Now I know the website to use, I could sow all sorts of disinformation from that site. It's like the National Enquirer. Where are the articles on UFOs?
Select to expand quotePcdefender said..
You did not bother to take the time to listen to his interview.
I am surprised that the mods on here continue to put up with your constant abuse.
You are a liar.
"A Kyoto University spokesman distanced the institution from Dr ****ushima's comments, telling AAP FactCheck in an email: "The institution doesn't take responsibility for faculty members and their comments post-retirement." The spokesman also said he was not aware of any official investigation into vaccine deaths."
So he did after all make the comments lol but the spokesman from the university said they the uni do not take responsibility for opinion of doctors post retirement.
Have you thought of ever becoming a politician?
You have a serious talent at skewing information.
I didn't comment whether or not ****ushima made those statements. There's plenty of retired academics and scientists who have lost the plot. Dementia affects many people, including scientists and academics. I'm sorry to have to tell you that you lost the plot long ago and that you continue to lie, I assume to attract attention.
So he did in fact make the comments but according to your outlandish theory he has dementia.
This is too funny.
Select to expand quotePcdefender said..
So he did in fact make the comments but according to your outlandish theory he has dementia.
This is too funny.
OK, I've been reading up on lying, and I may owe you an apology.
I now understand that pathological lying is a mental dysfunction that could be affecting you, ie ... "pathological lying is often done without any reason and regardless of consequences. These lies are extensive and elaborate, and the urge to tell them is compulsive. Pathological liars often make up stories, even if that causes them harm. They may lose jobs and ruin relationships because of their lying.?"
So, if you are a diagnosed Pathological Liar please accept my profuse apology.
If you a just a plain, ordinary attention-seeking liar, carry on.
Select to expand quoteremery said..Pcdefender said..
So he did in fact make the comments but according to your outlandish theory he has dementia.
This is too funny.
OK, I've been reading up on lying, and I may owe you an apology.
I now understand that pathological lying is a mental dysfunction that could be affecting you, ie ... "pathological lying is often done without any reason and regardless of consequences. These lies are extensive and elaborate, and the urge to tell them is compulsive. Pathological liars often make up stories, even if that causes them harm. They may lose jobs and ruin relationships because of their lying.?"
So, if you are a diagnosed Pathological Liar please accept my profuse apology.
If you a just a plain, ordinary attention-seeking liar, carry on.
I've got two pathological liars in my circle. The problem is they're both quite knowledgeable, but unfortunately everything they say must instantly be dismissed, as sifting fact from fiction is far too laborious.
Select to expand quotePcdefender said..
You too can run your own report from the WHO website. Check out the one from 1995 to 2000. It would probably mean more if they had the flu strains prevalent at the time. not new strains. Stats are great.
