Select to expand quotecammd said..FormulaNova said..cammd said..Brent in Qld said..
You are attempting to apply a process of reasoned logic to a mindset that is neither reasonable or logical, it is theological. And much like the situation in the middle east, there will not be a lasting compromise or resolution when fundamental theism is involved.
I would argue political ideologies have been responsible for greater suffering and death than theologies..... the majority of those being leftist ideologies.
Biblical quote "You Will Know Them by Their Fruits"
Is there a difference between political and religous ideologies? I would argue that both have been a way to control people in the past.
Probably not, both have been used to achieve the other.
I think ideology can be just as unreasonable and illogical as religion, so much so that it can become pseudo religious. Just look at some of the climate change dogma going on at the moment as a contemporary example.
Happy to stand by what I wrote. Said once, a fact does not need repeating or to be reinforced. Bull**** does.
Select to expand quoteremery said..Pcdefender said..
Using the term CT is a not-so-subtle way of putting down those who question the narrative be it with convid, 911 or any other conspiracy.
Same by mentioning the lizard people in your post - another obvious way to discredit those that do not swallow like yourself the establishment narrative.
You can literally see the lateral ejections in all three collapsing buildings prior to their collapse but in your sad and denialist mind all the video footage showing this does not count as evidence.
I prefer the term CL... Conspiracy Liar.
To me "liar" implies intent to deceive. I don't think the CT mob do that. I think they are a bit light on for common critical acumen to start with, and extremely skeptical and cynical to boot.
As for Pete's twin tower example there is room for doubt, but that's all. He doesn't let the fact that it is quite possibly exactly as it seems distract him from his dubious conviction that it was an inside job or whatever he thinks it was.
Select to expand quotecammd said..Pcdefender said..
Thanks to your input this discussion forum seems almost as much about attacking the messenger rather questioning the message.
says the man who just called everyone who doesn't think the world is flat "bi-pedal herd animals"
Lol, "bi-pedal herd animals" is not inaccurate. I'll own it. I assume it's meant to imply people who don't think, but it just comes across as unintentional irony.
I'm calling it.
Israel has lost this war.
Jews, worldwide are now far worse off than they were pre 7 October.
The indiscriminate shelling of homes, apartment blocks proves beyond any doubt what we are dealing with.
Select to expand quotemyscreenname said..
I'm calling it.
Israel has lost this war.
Jews, worldwide are now far worse off than they were pre 7 October.
Win or lose the situation is beyond the pale.
What concerns me is the consequences.
Iranian retribution could escalate into nuclear war.
Select to expand quotePcdefender said..
The indiscriminate shelling of homes, apartment blocks proves beyond any doubt what we are dealing with.
For what it's worth I think you may be right. It does seem to be indiscriminate.
Select to expand quotejapie said..myscreenname said..
I'm calling it.
Israel has lost this war.
Jews, worldwide are now far worse off than they were pre 7 October.
Win or lose the situation is beyond the pale.
What concerns me is the consequences.
Iranian retribution could escalate into nuclear war.
Order out of chaos.
Nothing would surprise me anymore.
This interview with Richard Sanders from DDN sheds light on the multiple lies told by the Israelis with regard to what happened on October 7th.
x.com/doubledownnews/status/1787136332399046704?s=46&t=1GB2TIBB90HpGgoUCFAO5w
Is there some rule somewhere where the people attacked by terrorists have to respond less agressively or something? I am surprised by the way people are examining the Israeli responses in detail, and completely glossing over the initial attack by a terrorist organisation that hides amongst the people it is supposedly defending. Drawing aggression to them and probably scurrying away themselves.
Next thing there will be someone saying it was a false-flag operation created by Israel for whatever reason. I think we can apply the same thinking for any situation we want to make out is a conspiracy.
This video above mentions all sorts of things and then says things like 'there may have been a lot of situations of rape, but there is no forensic evidence, there are no witnesses', and then no doubt goes on to come up with all sorts of things that the IDF did.
Maybe Hamas should be better at videoing their own actions so we can see a balanced viewpoint 
Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said..
Is there some rule somewhere where the people attacked by terrorists have to respond less agressively or something? I am surprised by the way people are examining the Israeli responses in detail, and completely glossing over the initial attack by a terrorist organisation that hides amongst the people it is supposedly defending. Drawing aggression to them and probably scurrying away themselves.
Next thing there will be someone saying it was a false-flag operation created by Israel for whatever reason. I think we can apply the same thinking for any situation we want to make out is a conspiracy.
This video above mentions all sorts of things and then says things like 'there may have been a lot of situations of rape, but there is no forensic evidence, there are no witnesses', and then no doubt goes on to come up with all sorts of things that the IDF did.
Maybe Hamas should be better at videoing their own actions so we can see a balanced viewpoint
If you had even a tiny bit of knowledge of the history of Israel you would realise that the terrorists are the Israelis.
The atrocities that they have committed over the decades in their quest to usurp the people who occupied the land before they pitched up waving the Balfour agreement are both long and disgusting.
And they haven't limited their psychotic attention to Palestinians:
www.britishforcesinpalestine.org/attacks/sergeants.html
These people, if you can call them that, are a blight on the human race. They pioneered modern terrorism:
www.timesofisrael.com/uk-opens-secret-files-about-jewish-terrorists-in-1940s/
And whilst you're at it have a listen to Nathan Pearson making a monkey of the claim that Palestinians are relative newcomers to the area:
www.ted.com/talks/nathaniel_pearson_the_splendid_tapestry_how_dna_reveals_truths_ancient_lasting
Select to expand quoteGasHazard said..
To me "liar" implies intent to deceive. I don't think the CT mob do that. I think they are a bit light on for common critical acumen to start with, and extremely skeptical and cynical to boot.
As for Pete's twin tower example there is room for doubt, but that's all. He doesn't let the fact that it is quite possibly exactly as it seems distract him from his dubious conviction that it was an inside job or whatever he thinks it was.
I used to think conspiracy theorists were harmless imbeciles. But more recently I began to learn that they are attention-seekers who, with their lies, prey on gullible people and cause harm.
Select to expand quoteFlySurfer said..
Only watched the first half, but it sure doesn't look great for Israel. The U.S. will withdraw support for Israel towards the end of the year, it's starting now. There's nothing to gain by supporting them. Israel has no plan and they know it, they've already lost.
Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said..
Is there some rule somewhere where the people attacked by terrorists have to respond less agressively or something? I am surprised by the way people are examining the Israeli responses in detail, and completely glossing over the initial attack by a terrorist organisation that hides amongst the people it is supposedly defending. Drawing aggression to them and probably scurrying away themselves.
Next thing there will be someone saying it was a false-flag operation created by Israel for whatever reason. I think we can apply the same thinking for any situation we want to make out is a conspiracy.
This video above mentions all sorts of things and then says things like 'there may have been a lot of situations of rape, but there is no forensic evidence, there are no witnesses', and then no doubt goes on to come up with all sorts of things that the IDF did.
Maybe Hamas should be better at videoing their own actions so we can see a balanced viewpoint
I already said it could be a false flag, about ten comments back. How many of the lower US states were stolen from Mexico in this way. Those ones aren't conspiracies anymore.
Select to expand quotemyscreenname said..FlySurfer said..
Only watched the first half, but it sure doesn't look great for Israel. The U.S. will withdraw support for Israel towards the end of the year, it's starting now. There's nothing to gain by supporting them. Israel has no plan and they know it, they've already lost.
I watched a little past where he referred to Oct 7th as a quote "spectacular success", seriously, a spectacular success. That's pretty sick, the mass murder of kids at a music festival for example a "spectacular success".
Next thing you know people will be calling into doubt the humanity of Israeli's, oh wait Japie has already done that in his post above These people, if you can call them that, are a blight on the human race.
Select to expand quotejapie said..FormulaNova said..
Is there some rule somewhere where the people attacked by terrorists have to respond less agressively or something? I am surprised by the way people are examining the Israeli responses in detail, and completely glossing over the initial attack by a terrorist organisation that hides amongst the people it is supposedly defending. Drawing aggression to them and probably scurrying away themselves.
Next thing there will be someone saying it was a false-flag operation created by Israel for whatever reason. I think we can apply the same thinking for any situation we want to make out is a conspiracy.
This video above mentions all sorts of things and then says things like 'there may have been a lot of situations of rape, but there is no forensic evidence, there are no witnesses', and then no doubt goes on to come up with all sorts of things that the IDF did.
Maybe Hamas should be better at videoing their own actions so we can see a balanced viewpoint
If you had even a tiny bit of knowledge of the history of Israel you would realise that the terrorists are the Israelis.
The atrocities that they have committed over the decades in their quest to usurp the people who occupied the land before they pitched up waving the Balfour agreement are both long and disgusting.
And they haven't limited their psychotic attention to Palestinians:
www.britishforcesinpalestine.org/attacks/sergeants.html
These people, if you can call them that, are a blight on the human race. They pioneered modern terrorism:
www.timesofisrael.com/uk-opens-secret-files-about-jewish-terrorists-in-1940s/
yeah yeah the Khazars are taking over the world, thanks for the heads up
Select to expand quotecammd said..
I watched a little past where he referred to Oct 7th as a quote "spectacular success", seriously, a spectacular success. That's pretty sick, the mass murder of kids at a music festival for example a "spectacular success".
]
I think sometimes people interpret certain words incorrectly. This is one of them. I don't think he meant it in a way of being proud, but more of it being surprisingly effective.
I find it amusing too when people think an 'argument' is solely about a negative discussion. I think most educated people can see the word argument as stating a case or viewpoint, not just as different parties arguing with each other.
But I do agree in that this guy seems a little too one-sided, showing the Israelis in a negative light and glossing over the attacks by Hamas. You would almost think that Hamas was a group intending on helping the Palestinians instead of a group that is effectively bringing poverty to them.
Select to expand quotepsychojoe said..FormulaNova said..
Is there some rule somewhere where the people attacked by terrorists have to respond less agressively or something? I am surprised by the way people are examining the Israeli responses in detail, and completely glossing over the initial attack by a terrorist organisation that hides amongst the people it is supposedly defending. Drawing aggression to them and probably scurrying away themselves.
Next thing there will be someone saying it was a false-flag operation created by Israel for whatever reason. I think we can apply the same thinking for any situation we want to make out is a conspiracy.
This video above mentions all sorts of things and then says things like 'there may have been a lot of situations of rape, but there is no forensic evidence, there are no witnesses', and then no doubt goes on to come up with all sorts of things that the IDF did.
Maybe Hamas should be better at videoing their own actions so we can see a balanced viewpoint
I already said it could be a false flag, about ten comments back. How many of the lower US states were stolen from Mexico in this way. Those ones aren't conspiracies anymore.
Just because something has happened before does not mean everything is an example of it. You could label almost anything a 'false-flag operation' to twist it to the way you want.
Sure, human nature is full of lies and greed, but it applies to both sides, not just the side you dislike the most.
How do you discern a genuine attack from a staged one? Did Hamas like Israel? Clearly not. Did they openly say that they hated Israel? Yes.
Sometime the obvious answer is the correct one.
Israeli propaganda reel.
www.instagram.com/reel/C7Eiiu1u8P8/?igsh=MTh4cnZtaGcycmJ2cA==
Check out some of his other videos and witness how the IDF are liberating Palestinian kids....
from their limbs.
Watch the genocide unfolding from your phone.
Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said..cammd said..
I watched a little past where he referred to Oct 7th as a quote "spectacular success", seriously, a spectacular success. That's pretty sick, the mass murder of kids at a music festival for example a "spectacular success".
]
I think sometimes people interpret certain words incorrectly. This is one of them. I don't think he meant it in a way of being proud, but more of it being surprisingly effective.
I find it amusing too when people think an 'argument' is solely about a negative discussion. I think most educated people can see the word argument as stating a case or viewpoint, not just as different parties arguing with each other.
But I do agree in that this guy seems a little too one-sided, showing the Israelis in a negative light and glossing over the attacks by Hamas. You would almost think that Hamas was a group intending on helping the Palestinians instead of a group that is effectively bringing poverty to them.
He is a Hamas apologist at best.
I watched the first part of his speech so as to hear a learned argument against the Israeli state, so I could consider the opposite side from an intelligent argument.
All I heard was a bias hypothesis with opinion and hearsay as the only evidence to support it. If that is the best argument for genocide and ethnic cleansing there is from a well respected published academic then it shows how weak the claims are.
For example he cites the 67 and 73 war as prior examples of ethnic cleansing, as proof of the Israeli goal, he completely ignores the fact Israel was attacked in both instances by other countries. How bias can you be to just ignore history like that.
Meanwhile 600000 dead in Syria but no one gives a crap because they haven't found a way to blame Israel for that . It's such hypocrisy, all the claims of genocide on Israel but none for Syria. How can anyone not see the real motive is anti semitism, its not human rights or care for innocent lives or don't Syrians count as much as Palestinians.
Hypocrites or fools, not sure which.
Are there any hospitals left in Gaza?
That was where we were told Hamas were hiding. Apart from the three shirtless hostages holding white flags, that were shot by the IDF, how many hostages have the IDF rescued in the 6 months of ethnic cleansing?
I thought the 'canned conflict' between Iran and Israel was kind of bizarre.
I do think it's possible that Israel bombing the Iranian consulate in Damascus was an attempt to drag the U.S. into conflict, which they were not going to do. I also believe, behind the scenes, the U.S. then orchestrated/negotiated the Iranian and the piss poor Israeli responses from that attack - when Israel blew up some radar in regional Iran to end it.
Either way, Israel is on the nose, and can't possibly come out of this mess, smelling like roses.
Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said.
Sometime the obvious answer is the correct one.
Seems obvious to me that this war would end if we just nuked the whole of Palestine and Israel.
Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said.
Sometime the obvious answer is the correct one.
Seems obvious to me that this war would end if we just nuked the whole of Palestine and Israel.
Select to expand quotemyscreenname said..
Check out some of his other videos and witness how the IDF are liberating Palestinian kids....
from their limbs.
Did you note the UN revised the number of women and children killed down by 50% this week.
That doesn't support your claim of a genocide or ethnic cleansing.
Also
Why don't you care about Syrian kids?
Select to expand quotecammd said..
Did you note the UN revised the number of women and children killed down by 50% this week.
I went to U.N. website and didn't see what you were talking about. Death toll is at 35k. It's not down 50% so I am not sure what you are gloating about.
Select to expand quotepsychojoe said..FormulaNova said.
Sometime the obvious answer is the correct one.
Seems obvious to me that this war would end if we just nuked the whole of Palestine and Israel.
Nah, that wouldn't work. There would be relatives somewhere that would swear vengence and the thing would keep on going, just somewhere else.
I think you could allocate/give a plot of land in these territories to every Palestinian, and things would still fall apart because someone somewhere decides that they want more or want revenge on something.
Didn't the Jewish establish a lot of their original farms in areas that otherwise were not usable to the Palestinians? Someone somewhere would insist that the desert bit that they used was their original ancestors tribal home or something.
Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said..psychojoe said..FormulaNova said.
Sometime the obvious answer is the correct one.
Seems obvious to me that this war would end if we just nuked the whole of Palestine and Israel.
Nah, that wouldn't work. There would be relatives somewhere that would swear vengence and the thing would keep on going, just somewhere else.
I think you could allocate/give a plot of land in these territories to every Palestinian, and things would still fall apart because someone somewhere decides that they want more or want revenge on something.
Didn't the Jewish establish a lot of their original farms in areas that otherwise were not usable to the Palestinians? Someone somewhere would insist that the desert bit that they used was their original ancestors tribal home or something.
I remember talking to an Afghan guy at the time, and he was of the opinion that Afghanistan should be nuked. Understanding that his family would be lost, he still thought it worthwhile as there was too many **** people. When he went to visit, he got abducted.
Maybe their families would understand
Select to expand quotepsychojoe said..FormulaNova said..psychojoe said..FormulaNova said.
Sometime the obvious answer is the correct one.
Seems obvious to me that this war would end if we just nuked the whole of Palestine and Israel.
Nah, that wouldn't work. There would be relatives somewhere that would swear vengence and the thing would keep on going, just somewhere else.
I think you could allocate/give a plot of land in these territories to every Palestinian, and things would still fall apart because someone somewhere decides that they want more or want revenge on something.
Didn't the Jewish establish a lot of their original farms in areas that otherwise were not usable to the Palestinians? Someone somewhere would insist that the desert bit that they used was their original ancestors tribal home or something.
I remember talking to an Afghan guy at the time, and he was of the opinion that Afghanistan should be nuked. Understanding that his family would be lost, he still thought it worthwhile as there was too many **** people. When he went to visit, he got abducted.
Maybe their families would understand
'Maybe their families would understand'? Nah, this is not how these things work.
Someone, who may not even be related, would one day decide that this was unjust and other innocent people must suffer because of it. People are strange. I am sure there are people out there that look for a cause to be angry about, just so that they can be angry. They want to be angry so that they can be recognised and be special.
Afghanistan? No, that was a perfectly functioning modern society before the Americans got there, just as it is now, now that they have left them to it.
