Pete , you have just been proven 100% wrong on so many accounts by Chris 249 and others. The crap you're putting forward now is really really dumb.
Maybe it's time to back away from this whole conspiracy, flat Earth rubbish you seem to be basing your life around ??
Clutching to all this ridiculous crap cannot be doing your mental health any good at all.
Let it go and move on man! You'll be a happier human.
Cheers, Hoops
Select to expand quotepetermac33 said..
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=196383
You just demonstrated my point perfectly.
Thanks Pete
Select to expand quoteChris 249 said..
I also notice that Mike Pecoraro, the witness who say bodies etc, said;
"When the room he is in starts filling with white smoke and he can smell kerosene (jet fuel), he heads upstairs with a co-worker toward a small machine shop on the C level......Pecoraro will say he only later hears that jet fuel actually came down the elevator shaft, blew off all the [elevator] doors, and flames rolled through the lobby. That explained all the burnt people and why everything was sooted in the lobby." See www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=mike_pecoraro_1
So the very man that Peter uses as his source for the allegations about the basement says that the soot, damage and burns came from JET FUEL, which he could smell himself and is hardly surprising in the circumstances, and not explosives. It's very, very dishonest for Peter to conceal that Pecoraro said jet fuel was involved, not bombs.
I wonder if reading some of these statements can be misleading. In his comments, this Mike Pecoraro mentions 'a 50 ton hydraulic press - gone'.
Someone reading it might think '50 tons! Something that big was destroyed', when in reality, a 50 ton hydraulic press is small and doesn't weigh 50 tons, it just exerts that amount of pressure.
I can see a conspiracy theorist might read this and see something explosive in the shadows.
That's a link to a site that includes holocaust denial articles. That's just sick.
Select to expand quotehoop said..petermac33 said..
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=196383
You just demonstrated my point perfectly.
Thanks Pete
...but but but, its called 'truthseeker' and its from the UK. What could be wrong about that?
Even a ten year old can see that its true, hence the name.
