Select to expand quote
Correlation...
Oh no- I have tinnitus, wouldnt possibly be all concerts, night clubs, car racing, stereos, shooting & occupational exposure i've had over the years it must be the 5G.
How can you take an article seriously with a clickbait misleading title.
Its fairly common in cults to dose people on enough psychadelics to point its easy and able to wash theyre minds. Then they fully believe theyre cause etc etc
Just wondering how many articles and acid trips i have to take to believe this 5g articles and videos? As psychedelics become more mainstream i wonder what we are going to create by entertaining such far out ideologies like flat earth fake moon landing etc etc because we really do have quite a maleiable mind. Why dont the conspiricy theorists come up with peace loving theorys? Were nearly there with the media keeps us upset and angry but why dont they go cookoo crazy on that one say were all super love robots from another planet or something.
Petermac you seem to be on the forefront of alot of these things what are some really wholesome and good conspiracy theories that has brainwashy articles written on them? Something like labrador puppys are the real world leaders or something.
Select to expand quoteFoghorn said..
Its all about tracking and controlling the population not so you can have faster internet .So why is pot illegal?wait, wait... it's illegal to make it cool, right?
15 minute video that will likely change your thinking on this.
Love the song at the end as well.
^^^
Do some research for once.
If someone is a 'toxicologist'
that should ring alarm bells.
Magda Havas is a quack - her PhD is in botany.
Select to expand quotepetermac33 said..
15 minute video that will likely change your thinking on this.
Love the song at the end as well.
Ummm, different slices of the brain are shown in that picture Pete, which means that there grey areas don't correlate to each other..... I'll find a song for you that says: " FFS THINK".
Select to expand quoteJulianRoss said..petermac33 said..
15 minute video that will likely change your thinking on this.
Love the song at the end as well.
Ummm, different slices of the brain are shown in that picture Pete, which means that there grey areas don't correlate to each other..... I'll find a song for you that says: " FFS THINK".
Whats more is that the scaling of the 'reduced' images is actually smaller than the first one. I would guess that the person that created this is trying to intentionally mislead the viewers.
...but they are conspiracy theorists, and as such, they won't look at it objectively and only follow it if it agrees with their misconceptions.
Sheep. Baaa Baaa. (insert general reference to 'even a child can see this' and other expressions)
Select to expand quotepetermac33 said..
I know next to nothing on this radiation stuff suffice say to say I believe the new smart meters that are being installed in Perth are likely to cause even more damage to our health.
Well, I'm married to someone who spent years of her life as a neuroscientist learning about mobile phone radiation. She had a whole lab, with electromagnetic screening etc, rigged up at a G8 university. The project was to follow up a slight possibility, raised in a UoW lab, that phone radiation had an effect on one brain wave frequency.
When she started the project she was scared about what would happen if mobiles did have a bad effect on the brain, although she thought it was very unlikely as so many studies had showed that they did not. On the other hand, if she could prove they DID, it would be great for her career since (despite what many claim) scientists develop their careers by breaking down the accepted theories. In the end, she found nothing. The effect she was looking for did not exist.
So if you "know next to nothing" why should we believe anything you say on this subject, especially when people who have spent years researching the area say you are wrong?
www.sott.net/article/420760-Why-the-Swiss-are-rebelling-against-5G-rollout
Federation of Doctors is also urging caution, maintaining that "as long as there is no scientific proof that raising the radiation limits will not impact health, one must refrain from raising them."
I remember discussion about French councils banning public WiFi about 10 or 15 years ago.
Same same?
Select to expand quotepetermac33 said..
www.sott.net/article/420760-Why-the-Swiss-are-rebelling-against-5G-rollout
Federation of Doctors is also urging caution, maintaining that "as long as there is no scientific proof that raising the radiation limits will not impact health, one must refrain from raising them."
Really? What's your evidence for the claim that the FMH is saying that? Where is the press release from them? Who was the spokesperson? Do you have the slightest evidence apart from a poorly written article that provides no proof of its claims?
If the FMH is against 5G, why doesn't something appear on their website when you search under 5G there? Why would they have put out a statement about the dangers of 5G but not put it with their other press releases?
Why do you believe "Coco Tache-Berther" and what she says on 5G? How much study has she done on radiation? Which experiments has she run or studied?
I don't know what you do for a job, but I bet you'd get pissed off if someone who knew nothing about your work was arrogant enough to sling **** at you and claim they knew how to do it better than you do. Why do you feel you are such a god that you know more about science than those who spend their lives studying it?
Perhaps another topic like man made climate change where the 'science' is settled and therefore no further discussion should be entertained?
humansarefree.com/2019/06/the-most-comprehensive-5g-expose-the-ultimate-weapon-of-depopulation.html
This video isn't a rant video, but rather just demonstrating how much 5g weakens around walls, inside apartments etc.
Essentially, you won't be getting nearly the full effects unless you are living under a tower, in a tent.
I thought you'd be happy about 5G Pete. It is far, far more "directional" than 4G, so rather than the towers beaming out *everywhere* they will be focused. That means far less radiation in general.
Your WiFi router and devices that connect to it are probably already doing this "directional" thingy. If you are affected by WiFi you would have noticed.
Of course, Pete, I expect no reply. No acknowledgement that perhaps you don't know everything.
Just glad I could open your mind a little.
Select to expand quoteChris 249 said..
It really does require the most extraordinary arrogance for someone who has apparently never had the slightest bit of training in an area to decide that they are right, and the people who spent years training in the field and have actually carried out properly conducted experiments in shielded labs etc are wrong.
That is not just being gullible; it's worshipping yourself and thinking that others are morons. Personally I prefer to respect people and learn from them, and that is definitely far more logical than paranoid conspiracy theory BS.
Bravo, well said Sir. 
Going to watch some of the presentations tonight.
newagora.ca/timeline-of-lawsuits-legislation-opposition-and-warnings-regarding-forced-5g-installation-in-the-u-s-and-worldwide/
newagora.ca/prominent-biochemistry-professor-warns-5g-is-the-stupidest-idea-in-the-history-of-the-world/
Select to expand quotepetermac33 said..
Going to watch some of the presentations tonight.
newagora.ca/timeline-of-lawsuits-legislation-opposition-and-warnings-regarding-forced-5g-installation-in-the-u-s-and-worldwide/
newagora.ca/prominent-biochemistry-professor-warns-5g-is-the-stupidest-idea-in-the-history-of-the-world/
Congratulations! You are going to watch something that will just confirm your existing beliefs.
What are the concerns with it, if you could just summarise them in a few sentences?
I have read previously of schools in the UK asking for it to be removed citing various health concerns of their students.
This 4 minute video backs up the claims of schools in the UK who are concerned about it causing problems with sleep.
Locations in Australia........
tottnews.com/2019/05/16/5g-tower-locations-australia/
Select to expand quotepetermac33 said..
I have read previously of schools in the UK asking for it to be removed citing various health concerns of their students.
So why do you believe the schools, and yet call the people who actually study mobile phone radiation a pack of liars or incompetents?
Select to expand quotepetermac33 said..
This 4 minute video backs up the claims of schools in the UK who are concerned about it causing problems with sleep.
Locations in Australia........
tottnews.com/2019/05/16/5g-tower-locations-australia/
#fauxfullscreen
A simple google search for "Matt Landman" explains exactly just why petie would be suckered in by this bloke - 
It is sad really sad.
Select to expand quoteRupert said..
A simple google search for "Matt Landman" explains exactly just why petie would be suckered in by this bloke - It is sad really sad.
Chemtrails boy 
I am sure he wears a silver hat
There appears to be almost countless studies that show the dangers of 5G.
www.sott.net/article/422649-Scientific-American-issues-severe-warning-on-5G-dangers
Select to expand quotepetermac33 said..
There appears to be almost countless studies that show the dangers of 5G.
www.sott.net/article/422649-Scientific-American-issues-severe-warning-on-5G-dangers
If you actually read it you might note he takes aim at all cellular bandwidths 2G up. More bullish!t.
Select to expand quotehilly said..petermac33 said..
There appears to be almost countless studies that show the dangers of 5G.
www.sott.net/article/422649-Scientific-American-issues-severe-warning-on-5G-dangers
If you actually read it you might note he takes aim at all cellular bandwidths 2G up. More bullish!t.
My favorite bit: click the author's name...
" search for articles by author:
zero results "
