Not too much about this wing out there so thought I'd post a review of the 5.2 Ensis v2 after my first session.
OK so I've been winging a little over a year and would say I'm pretty proficient but at 57 I'm no Balz Muller. I have been riding S-Wings in 6, 4.2 and 2.8. 80l board usually on Axis 900/400 combo as my setup of preference. Im 73 kg. Swapped out my Swings for an Ensis V2 quivver. decided on 5.2, 3.5, 2.5 quivver as we've laid the wings over some other brands and can see that the Ensis is much bigger than stated. 5.2 is like a 6, 3.5 is like a 4, 2.5 is like a 3. Theres another brand that everyone is saying is crazy powerful that is doing this same size bs too.
Wont go into the details too much as there are other reviews out there for that. I'll stick mainly to how it feels.
The canopy is really tight at the front as the photos show. The leech is a little looser. Even when sitting on the water the canopy stays in its foil shape. Build is bomber and the cloth is water resistant unlike the SWing which gets really wet. A smidgeon heavier than the f-One and I noticed this when the wind dropped and i had to hold it up to start.
The strut is large and stiff.
Soooo different from the SWing it took a while to get dialed and to be honest I still need some more time on it. Wind started very light and gusty 0-10 knots then the arvo seabreeeze came through well past 15 knots at times. My forearms are burning. Not sure if its the new handles that need to be worn in a bit, or the different size to the handles or the power that is loaded on the front arm, or just that I finally got out of my winter wetsuit and into my spring suit with tighter arms, but for a while I was longing for a harness. There is much more front hand pull and rather than move your front hand back it seems better to move it forward to get a more even balance. Managed to stay out for 21/2 hours once I got in the groove, and it felt better once the wind built up a bit and my arms warmed up properly. Overall impression is its a big step up from the SWing but is so different its hard to compare. To depower you just feather it in to the wind whereas with the swing you just pull it in hard and it automatically spills the wind when overpowered. Hard to say if its more or less powerful than a swing 6. Probably much the same but feels better behaved at the upper end and at the bottom end it pumps a tad better once there is a bit of wind in it, but in the superlight the softer SWing probably pumps better as it moves air over itself better with the more open leech. Ensis has a few big plusses. Touch the tip and she just bounces up, you cant do that on a swing 6. She goes way better upwind, like alot better. Handles are different but not as comfy as Fone (yet) maybe need to wear in as they felt a bit new and slippery like they needed to be roughed up a bit with use. Not sure if I dig the long handles or not. Its easy to adjust your hand position which i guess is nice and I was always searching for the F-One handles on a backside tack but not on these handles. I think this is just something Ill get used to ....no biggie. She transitions so much more comfortably. Going for front and backside tacks the wing just feathers into the wind where the Swing always tried to push me back and chuck me off. I would always look for a lull to tack with the FOne but with the Ensis I just slammed her up into the wind no matter what windstrength. She seemed easier to lift from the water into a starting position and I think this is the same reason it tacks easier, it feathers better in to the wind. It was flat water so I cant comment on flag-out behaviour.
The 5.2 will be my biggest wing for this summer as its really a 6m size and i cant imagine using the actual 6 unless you live in total drifter conditions or are pretty heavy. For me it will be an 8-15 knot wing then Ill change to the 3.5 (which is really a 4).
I had some reservations about ditching the FOnes as they have been really good comfortable fun wings and have great behaviour when flagged out surfing but I now see that things have moved on quite alot over the last year. I can see that upgrading will help my progression.


Great to read first impressions. I had a look at the 6m Ensis and it's an absolute monster. I can now believe videos showing this going in less than 10 knots! Ive been using the 4m & 5m Wasp and deciding between Ensis and Armstrong A Wings for an upgrade.
Can anyone back to back review these 2?
At 76kg, ideally I want a 3 wing quiver however I want a little more horsepower than the 5m Wasp this summer and I also like a smaller wing when it's 25knots+. Although the 4m is rated to 35 odd knots, I'd prefer to use something like a 3m above 25knots. Then the 5m is a 'goldilocks' size, so this is a must...sounds like I'm convincing myself for a 4 wing quiver!
I do not understand this gross sizing inaccuracy , it is good that manufacturers strive for gruntier wings with good low end but sizing should be somewhat in the ballpark.
I bought an Ensis 6m a couple months ago and it did not make it into the water...50cm leading edge burst after inflating it to 9.5psi (labelled press range on the wing was 9-11psi).
I xchecked the pump vs two others and the psi gauge was fine.
I have to say that i had no trouble at all with the warranty claim,the dealer was incredibly wonderful about it, but i went to another brand he offered (Airush) with way lower PSI (4 psi for 6m).
I think Ensis has lowered the recommended pressures lately.
What is the pressure range in yours?.
it says 7-8 psi but I have always maxxed out the pressure on my wings. Im actually going to try it a bit softer some time soon.
it says 7-8 psi but I have always maxxed out the pressure on my wings. Im actually going to try it a bit softer some time soon.
7-8psi sounds a lot more reasonable.
I probably got a defective wing plus they went a bit nuts with the pressure ranges initially.
You should be fine,enjoy it!.
it says 7-8 psi but I have always maxxed out the pressure on my wings. Im actually going to try it a bit softer some time soon.
In your underside picture, I notice a few crinkles on the head of the strut where it joins the front tube. Is that apparent at both high and low pressures on your wing? I haven't noticed it on other wings and wonder if its a one off or just the design ? Surely can't be good for the bladder to not be uniformly inflated.
Re sizing, I don't think the sizing is incorrect. I just laid my ENSIS4.5 on the 4m Naish it look like 0.5 bigger to me. Obviouly not exact sience.Other then that, Naish vs the ESIS is day and night. Wouldn't go back to the Naish.

it says 7-8 psi but I have always maxxed out the pressure on my wings. Im actually going to try it a bit softer some time soon.
In your underside picture, I notice a few crinkles on the head of the strut where it joins the front tube. Is that apparent at both high and low pressures on your wing? I haven't noticed it on other wings and wonder if its a one off or just the design ? Surely can't be good for the bladder to not be uniformly inflated.
I think you're overanalysing things mate
Re sizing, I don't think the sizing is incorrect. I just laid my ENSIS4.5 on the 4m Naish it look like 0.5 bigger to me. Obviouly not exact sience.Other then that, Naish vs the ESIS is day and night. Wouldn't go back to the Naish.

More like .75 to 1m extra from my experience on areas.
But there is a lot more than that in the equation.
I have had the Naish and very happy but that was the S25 version and that looks like the V1.
but even 0.5SqM in a 4m wing is a 12.5% discrepancy. That is a huge difference in measured area. Imagine a windsurf race sail where the area could be 7.9Sqm to 9SqM but called the same area. It just boggles the mind that this can just be dismissed as "marketing".
..looking at those wings on top of each other looks >0.5m difference from my non expert eyes... i was always amazed laying windsurf sails eg a 5.3 vs 5.7 how litter material difference there was. in the pic above there is a clear and very signficant difference in depth...i would have guessed that was >1m square?
Laid the #1 selling FOne 5.0 over my new Ensis 5.2, I'd say 0.2 more is spot on. No...I'm not taking the time to do the math on either one of these. ?? The FOne is slightly higher aspect so wing tips are wider, Ensis has longer boom. 
Cool that's what I did with my Naish overlay. Good to know the sizes are correct ![]()
Had me worried for a second but once I over-layed them, all was well. Waiting for wind to test them,
There is even more in the equation eg projected area versus actual area - flat tight wings compared with umbrella wings.