Hi,I
have a question for foil enthusiasts:
Assuming an efficient foil with a "reasonable" shape (avoiding extreme foils, let's consider sizes between 1000-1300 cm^2 and an aspect ratio (AR) of 8-10), and you're pumping the board flat (without foot pumping), do you know what the "typical minimum speed" is required to lift the board out of the water?
Let's overlook other variables for this discussion (such as board shape, current or wave conditions, and pumping skills ). For your information, I'm in the process of designing a non-standard hull for a light wind board, slightly different than the actual DW shapes.
My GPS tracks show board-speed jumping from ~5 knots to 9 knots about where I first take off, so I'm saying my takeoff speed is ~5 knots.
I'm 100kg's and using a PNG1150 in flat-ish saltwater, advanced beginner (I foil easily but can't gybe).
This take off speed hasn't changed from using my 6'10" wide board compared to my 7'6' skinny DW'er board, the DW'er just gets there easier.
Edit: Looking forward to using my new (to me) 1300PNG and see what that does to takeoff speed. ![]()
My GPS tracks show board-speed jumping from ~5 knots to 9 knots about where I first take off, so I'm saying my takeoff speed is ~5 knots.
I'm 100kg's and using a PNG1150 in flat-ish saltwater, advanced beginner (I foil easily but can't gybe).
This take off speed hasn't changed from using my 6'10" wide board compared to my 7'6' skinny DW'er board, the DW'er just gets there easier.
Edit: Looking forward to using my new (to me) 1300PNG and see what that does to takeoff speed. ![]()
Hi, thanks for your contribution, although I believe your figures are incorrect.Do you think you can pump x2 or x3 walking speed ? 5-9 knt as pre-foiling speed is a too high and GPS is not accurate in short distances. Many people tend to walk at about 3 Knt (1.42 metres per second 5.1 km/h; 3.2 mph; 4.7 ft/s from wikipedia) .... I guess with 4 Knt a regular foils starts to fly.
Of course "take off speed hasn't changed from using my 6'10" wide board compared to my 7'6' skinny DW'er board" simply with the DW board you need less eford (less wind, less wing size, less pumping technique...)
Damien leRoy's Youtube video compares Lift Foils with a foildrive and surprised me that small foil was (I think) 10mph and big foil 8mph. It looks like with pumping he could get up much earlier, but the point of the video was not to do that.. I'm an early intermediate and reckon once board reaches fast walking pace (4 knots) I can pump/bounce up, and looking back at GPS tracks that looks about right. In light winds feels like problem is getting board to 4knots which I guess the long,thin boards help.
7-9 knots depending on your weight and foil size
let's assume weight, board, foil size, etc.. are balanced.the question is still valid.I don't think we can pump a board to 7-9 knt.... 7Knt is 13 Km/h .... I don't think we can achieve this speed by just pumping, before releasing the board to foil.
My GPS tracks show board-speed jumping from ~5 knots to 9 knots about where I first take off, so I'm saying my takeoff speed is ~5 knots.
I'm 100kg's and using a PNG1150 in flat-ish saltwater, advanced beginner (I foil easily but can't gybe).
This take off speed hasn't changed from using my 6'10" wide board compared to my 7'6' skinny DW'er board, the DW'er just gets there easier.
Edit: Looking forward to using my new (to me) 1300PNG and see what that does to takeoff speed. ![]()
Hi, thanks for your contribution, although I believe your figures are incorrect.Do you think you can pump x2 or x3 walking speed ? 5-9 knt as pre-foiling speed is a too high and GPS is not accurate in short distances. Many people tend to walk at about 3 Knt (1.42 metres per second 5.1 km/h; 3.2 mph; 4.7 ft/s from wikipedia) .... I guess with 4 Knt a regular foils starts to fly.
Of course "take off speed hasn't changed from using my 6'10" wide board compared to my 7'6' skinny DW'er board" simply with the DW board you need less eford (less wind, less wing size, less pumping technique...)
I think you're misunderstanding what I'm saying FranP.
I'm saying that the foil starts to lift my 100kg's at about 5 knots and accelerates to 9 knots as it lifts out. No way I'm pumping at 9 knots!
Hopefully you can make out the GPS output below from my GT-31 unit. It's not the one I was looking for but it does illustrate my point. It was a marginal day and it shows me lifting off at around 5 knots and flying for short periods (about 2 minutes I'd guess) before landing...
Edit: This one's a bit better, you can see the speed increments now, I'd say there's bit there at 4.5 knots when I'm still slogging but acceleration happens pretty quick from 5 knots as the board lifts out... ![]()

A few years ago we were playing behind a boat w a older Naish 2000 foil, which had a huge high lift foil section. We brought the boat up to speed slowly and at intervals and everyone was logging w various watches plus the boats navigation system. The board was the old Naish multi-purpose foil board w the pretty Tequila Sunrise Red to Yellow fade. You could feel the first lift round 4.5 to 5.0 knots. Lighter riders around 65 kg's came up around the 4.5, us 80 kg's around 5. We didn't do any pumping.
That said, I was trying to flat water start a few days ago and my watch said I peaked at 5.6 mph, but I didn't come up. Haven't got my cardio up to sustain that yet.
If I had the time and resources I would love to conduct some more scientific experiments, I would think these bigger companies would be pulling boards in some tanks for data.
7-9 knots depending on your weight and foil size
let's assume weight, board, foil size, etc.. are balanced.the question is still valid.I don't think we can pump a board to 7-9 knt.... 7Knt is 13 Km/h .... I don't think we can achieve this speed by just pumping, before releasing the board to foil.
I've done some pretty careful testing and stall speed for me and my gear (~100kg total) is 8 knots on my 950cm ar8.8 foil. You need to be going about 1 knot over stall to get off the water, so 9 knots minimum takeoff speed for that foil. Happily, testing results match predictions quite closely, so an 1150 version of that foil would drop the stall speed about another knot to 7knots and takeoff to 8. The prediction for an 85kg foiling weight and the 1150 is 6.4 knots stall and 7.4 takeoff
Always better to look at actual data. Here's a graph showing sorted speeds for a foil session on a 1500 cm2 foil (Axis HPS 1050), 90 kg sailor:

The jump between 4 and 8-10 knots shows the region where the foil first starts to contribute lift, and later contributes enough lift for board and sailor. The board in the case is 228 cm long, 85 cm wide, 140 l. Next, a sorted speed graph for a lighter winger (60 kg) on a 1250 cm2 foil:

Here, the curve is shifted downward a bit, and the "rapid acceleration" part starts at 3 knots. The board is shorter (150 cm) so it has a lower hull speed. It requires active pumping to fly (unless it's crazy windy).
For the answer to your question, you'll need to look at the parts above ~ 8 knots where the curve flattens out again. For a 90 kg sailor on a 1300 cm2 foil, you'll need about 8-10 knots. But keep in mind that the foil push is not an "all or nothing" thing. Even below 8 knots, the foil will provide lift that causes the board to rise partly out of the water and accelerate.
The data above are from using a very accurate GPS recording at 5 Hz. Data from watches recording at the usual 1 Hz will be a lot less accurate, and not have enough data points for a clear picture to emerge.
Thank you everyone for your insights and the data provided!
Even though it's a theoretical exercise (pumping and apparent wing effects are not considered), it has been enlightening to know that 4-6 Knt is the speed where foil starts lifting out of the water.
The next step is finding the optimal hull with a reasonable length (6'-7') and width (19"-20") to displace water efficiently and achieve a speed of 4-6 knots.
Foil lift is proportional to the square of speed. So if a foil lifts an 80 kg sailor at 8 knots, then it will provide 20 kg of lift at 4 knots. With an efficient enough board, that will reduce drag enough to allow acceleration. On a short and wide board, you may run into hull speed issues, which need to be overcome with pumping.
For a "self starting" shape that gets going without much pumping, one issue is how to get the volume. You want excess volume, otherwise you get a lot of drag from water coming over the top of the board. To keep the length near 6 feet, you would need to make the board quite thick, which has it's own drawbacks. A longer board will also have a smaller bow wave, and resulting drag. For foil boards, the bow wave may not be quite as terrible as for other water crafts, since riding up the bow wave increases the angle of attack of the foil. That said, we probably only want an increase of a few degrees. I have not run any numbers on this, but my gut feeling is that this points toward quite long boards (> 7ft), with a bow shape that does not ride up much (low volume, wave piercing, and so on).
All else being equal, board width should have a (roughly) linear effect, so going from 20 to 22 inches should increase drag by about 10 percent. More interesting is the design of the underwater structure near the bow. Just about anything will work, but what works best - flat like most traditional boards, rounded like a D2 windsurfing board, sharp Vs like catamarans, or even wave-piercing shapes with a downward slope at the top (like on the Slingshot Flyer), or a mix of these? This would be a great thesis project in fluid dynamics, with a theoretical and practical component. Maybe we should get Fangman and Flex2 into winging to see what they come up with
.
Is this the future of light wing foiling ?
www.gilisports.com/blogs/kayaking/the-best-kayaks-for-racing
Foil lift is proportional to the square of speed. So if a foil lifts an 80 kg sailor at 8 knots, then it will provide 20 kg of lift at 4 knots. With an efficient enough board, that will reduce drag enough to allow acceleration. On a short and wide board, you may run into hull speed issues, which need to be overcome with pumping.
For a "self starting" shape that gets going without much pumping, one issue is how to get the volume. You want excess volume, otherwise you get a lot of drag from water coming over the top of the board. To keep the length near 6 feet, you would need to make the board quite thick, which has it's own drawbacks. A longer board will also have a smaller bow wave, and resulting drag. For foil boards, the bow wave may not be quite as terrible as for other water crafts, since riding up the bow wave increases the angle of attack of the foil. That said, we probably only want an increase of a few degrees. I have not run any numbers on this, but my gut feeling is that this points toward quite long boards (> 7ft), with a bow shape that does not ride up much (low volume, wave piercing, and so on).
All else being equal, board width should have a (roughly) linear effect, so going from 20 to 22 inches should increase drag by about 10 percent. More interesting is the design of the underwater structure near the bow. Just about anything will work, but what works best - flat like most traditional boards, rounded like a D2 windsurfing board, sharp Vs like catamarans, or even wave-piercing shapes with a downward slope at the top (like on the Slingshot Flyer), or a mix of these? This would be a great thesis project in fluid dynamics, with a theoretical and practical component. Maybe we should get Fangman and Flex2 into winging to see what they come up with
.
Thanks boardsurfr !
...I've just learned from Wikipedia about bow waves. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bow_wave.
The negative effect of the bow wave is it just a board nose issue ? This does not seem to be a major drag factor, compared to the board bottom as you pointed.
Will it work better a kayak racing nose style (no rocker and ultra sharp nose) ?
Rounded bottoms like the KT downwind board seem to be the answer, although they are hard to balance.
What about tails ? How to make them shorter and with enough volume ?
Thank you everyone for your insights and the data provided!
Even though it's a theoretical exercise (pumping and apparent wing effects are not considered), it has been enlightening to know that 4-6 Knt is the speed where foil starts lifting out of the water.
The next step is finding the optimal hull with a reasonable length (6'-7') and width (19"-20") to displace water efficiently and achieve a speed of 4-6 knots.
Board companies comeup with long and thin with rear shapes to aid release on pump.
The negative effect of the bow wave is it just a board nose issue ? This does not seem to be a major drag factor, compared to the board bottom as you pointed.
The problem with the bow wave is that a normal boat/board shape will climb up the wave. The faster you go, the bigger the bow wave, and the steeper the uphill angle gets. The creates a limit how fast a traditional boat shape can go in displacement mode, the "hull speed". To go faster than the hull speed requires a lot more power, or transition to planing/semi-planing, or a wave-piercing nose. For a given volume and weight, the bow wave gets smaller as the board/boat gets longer, causing the calculated hull speed to increase with the square of the length, IIRC.
Hull speed is a simplistic concept; multi-hull race boats and planing boats and windsurf boards can go a lot faster than theoretical hull speed. But for the board you want to design, it's highly relevant. For example, lower nose volume and rounded or V-type shapes can reduce how much the board rides up the bow wave, and more length reduces it (think of 14-17 ft long race SUPs!). I've seen videos of guys being very happy with 8-ft downwind boards.
What about tails ? How to make them shorter and with enough volume ?
This kind of thinking is what led to the traditional short and fat board shapes. If you look at current DW boards, they tend to have a long tail, typically a pintail. Basically, the outside rails are pulled back together for a smooth water flow in displacement mode. That minimizes turbulences and the resulting drag. A benefit it that the tail volume is reduced, allowing wingers to sink the tail easier when pumping the board to increase the angle of attack on the foil. That generates more lift to get the board out of the water.
Impressing analysis. Thanks so much for the hints !
So, assuming the "only objective" of a foil board is to lift the foil (touch downs are not an issue) and such event happens at 4-6 Knt, what do you think the optimal (not perfect) board hull and shape is, if length cannot be longer than 7' and reasonable volume 80-100 L ?
tough question, I guess ![]()
Not sure there is such a thing as an optimum board shape; every decision has advantages and draw backs. I'd play around with a board design program to get an idea what's possible. Personally, I'd consider going to 22 inches wide, maybe even a bit more, and at least a bit beyond 7 ft, with the foil close to the center. But I'd also aim for at least 110 l to have +20 liters. Underwater shape is something that would deserve some experimentation, but definitely round or V in front, and some kind of pin tail in the back. A lot of that seems to be the current standard, except that I'd be willing to go longer and wider than many boards out there. I don't think I'll get a chance to try enough shapes to base a design on that.