Forums > Windsurfing Gear Reviews

Boardseeker Test: Goya W3D the best wave sail.

Reply
Created by Alberto > 9 months ago, 20 Jul 2009
Alberto
WA, 213 posts
20 Jul 2009 2:20PM
Thumbs Up

The Goya W3D was a favourite amongst our test Clones. Not the most powerful sail in this test but arguably the best wave sail. It feels light in the hands, manoeuvrable and lot of fun to use....read more

http://www.boardseekermag.com/windsurfing-equipment-tests/goya-w3d-5.3-2009.html


stehsegler
WA, 3543 posts
20 Jul 2009 6:46PM
Thumbs Up

no offense but I don't think the test is that accurate...
... It's a "Power Wave Sail" test yet they rate the Goya the best wave sail. What do they mean with that? The best wave sail for lighter guys? I think that statement is very miss leading.

Don't get me wrong. I don't doubt in a second that the Goya W3D is a great wave sail but I can almost guarantee you that it's the wrong sail for a heavier rider.


gazza
WA, 647 posts
21 Jul 2009 9:28AM
Thumbs Up

stehsegler said...

no offense but I don't think the test is that accurate...
... It's a "Power Wave Sail" test yet they rate the Goya the best wave sail. What do they mean with that? The best wave sail for lighter guys? I think that statement is very miss leading.

Don't get me wrong. I don't doubt in a second that the Goya W3D is a great wave sail but I can almost guarantee you that it's the wrong sail for a heavier rider.






But as the test says quote:

"Compared to the other sails in this test, the Goya W3D feels like a smaller sail on the water. We checked it’s size by overlaying it on the other sails, but found that it isn't visibly any smaller - it just feels it. And this is a good thing"

So if you feel like you need more power you can always go up 1 more size than you normally would buy without it feeling like the sail is is to big and clumsy

i have a quiver of these sail and love them to death

The test couldn't test strength over a short period.

These sails are tough i even snapped a mast on a very heavy wave at Scarbs .
I was expecting full sail damage even after it was washed up on the beach the only damage was about 10cm of stitching that had come undone on the luff tube which was easily fixed

I tried the interactive tool on the test page and the test picked the 3d wave for me
so if you know what you want out of a sail you should be able to pick the right one for you

stehsegler
WA, 3543 posts
21 Jul 2009 11:54AM
Thumbs Up

gazza said...

So if you feel like you need more power you can always go up 1 more size than you normally would buy without it feeling like the sail is is to big and clumsy

i have a quiver of these sail and love them to death


I don't buy that argument for a heavier sailor. I usually try and go down in size as soon as I can. When you are talking a 5.3, going bigger in size means going 5.7 or 6.2 . There is no way the 6.2 would offer the same agility as a 5.3. And the 5.7 in my opinion wouldn't give you the same power as say a 5.4 Alpha.

As I said, for lighter sailors this might all be true but I don't buy the argument as far as this being the ideal power wave sail for heavier riders.

As a side note, have a look at their time riders. I have yet to find one of them that is on the upper end of the scales. Most of them are in the 70kg range...

I think most manufacturers (both sails and boards) simply ignore the market of 90kg plus wave sailors. I think Neil Pryde is a company that has provided good sails for that segment for quite a while now. A lot of it can be attributed to input by Bojrn D. in the past and Antoine Albeau more recently.

It would be interesting to get some info on the Boardseeker test team.

Paul
WA, 346 posts
21 Jul 2009 1:53PM
Thumbs Up



"I think most manufacturers (both sails and boards) simply ignore the market of 90kg plus wave sailors" - Stehsegler

You are so right - I mean the pryde alpha, simmer iron, north duke/ ice, severne blade, gaastra poison, naish force etc... the RRD 90 & 99 ltr twin and cult 90, Starboard evo 90 and 100, the JP RRW 92, mistral twin 92 and wave 96, naish global 98, exocet Xwave 95 and 103 etc... are all made for lightwieghts right

Mate, your pro JP pryde rants are getting tired. Yes they make very good gear but it is not the only great stuff out there, nor the only ones making gear for bigger guys.

You are partly right in your criticism of the Boardseeker reviews as they were a little contradictory in their assessments. But judgments about the best sails or boards will always show the bias of the testers due to weight and ability. It doesn't make them wrong - you simply read between the lines and re-adjust for your size.
I for one could not understand how the S-1 was included at all instead of the Blade, nor did I agree with their view of the sail but that is just my opinion. And where were the naish forces.
They obviously tested what was available and had a preference out of what was on offer. So be it.

gazza
WA, 647 posts
21 Jul 2009 2:18PM
Thumbs Up

Paul said...




I for one could not understand how the S-1 was included at all instead of the Blade, nor did I agree with their view of the sail but that is just my opinion. And where were the naish forces.
They obviously tested what was available and had a preference out of what was on offer. So be it.


your dead right Paul I thought to the S-1 was more dtl sail maybe as they had tested the Blade already it was pointless testing it twice.

But the Naish Force should def been included as thats one of the most powerful wave sails around.

By the way you didnt miss much i had 2 runs before the wind dropped for good

Alberto
WA, 213 posts
21 Jul 2009 3:17PM
Thumbs Up

Im actually very impressed with the result of the test , frequently those test are done in onshore condition and sloppy waves that are not really reflect what we have here in Western Australia. Sails like the Alpha are dominating the tests due the fact that are specifically designed for onshore condition. So Im very happy that the Wave 3D is still came out the best sail not been a dedicated onshore wave sail.
On the other side, in my very personal opinion, if not necessary due conditions, I think the majority of people would prefer avoid to use an onshore wave sail. Power is a very personal matter, some people like it other don't care even if they are 100Kg.
We have riders that are over 90kg, happy to dog out in solid 10/15 foots swell and enjoy the looseness and neutrality of a cross on/off sail in their way in. Its matter of technique, fitness and balls....

NR
WA, 517 posts
21 Jul 2009 3:32PM
Thumbs Up

Perfectly said Alberto.

stehsegler
WA, 3543 posts
21 Jul 2009 4:07PM
Thumbs Up

Paul said...
You are so right - I mean the pryde alpha, simmer iron, north duke/ ice, severne blade, gaastra poison, naish force etc... the RRD 90 & 99 ltr twin and cult 90, Starboard evo 90 and 100, the JP RRW 92, mistral twin 92 and wave 96, naish global 98, exocet Xwave 95 and 103 etc... are all made for lightwieghts right


Have you actually tried any of these boards? I have either tried and in a couple of cases actually owned most of them. As far as wave boards go they all feel like an after thought rather than a wave board designed for heavier riders.

I have heard from a couple of people now that one of very few companies actively looking at this segment and doing proper R&D is OES. I haven't tried their boards yet but am keen to see how the 98 Twin Wave works.

RE sails, you forgot to mention Ezzy. I think their SE wave sails have a good amount of grunt in them to qualify as a sail for heavier people plus they seem to be build like a tank.


Mate, your pro JP pryde rants are getting tired. Yes they make very good gear but it is not the only great stuff out there, nor the only ones making gear for bigger guys.

Obviously JP/ Pryde are not the only companies out there that make good gear... problem is everything else I have tried so far hasn't lived up to the hype.

Actually let me correct this... I think one of the most underrated floaty wave boards is the old Angulo Chango 95 (aka the Jesus board).

BTW, yes I also have a 84 liter wave board which I generally take out as soon as the wind is steady enough... the problem is that if you go out in places like Gnaraloo were the wind is cross off and gusty as hell and you don't have much clearance over the reef the best technique or fitness won't help you... what you need is a floaty board that doesn't behave like a tanker once you get on a wave.

Rider5
WA, 567 posts
21 Jul 2009 8:06PM
Thumbs Up

As bordering as a Heavy ish person, dense bones I like to think. I kinda agree a bit with the steghegslerizer. The little guys just don't understand how it it feels and they never will until they strap an officer water cooler bottle to themselves. I have tried a few of the larger production boards and I think they are a bit flatter in the rocker, to help the board get going which has a negative effect of stiffening up a board too. The Mistral, Goya and Quatro's in the larger sizes didn't seem to feel too stiff though.
Re the Bjorn and Antone input comment do you really think they ride their sponsors productions?? I don't.
JP wave boards are pretty flat for wave boards as it is.

Rider5
WA, 567 posts
21 Jul 2009 8:28PM
Thumbs Up

Just went and checked out the test. The test is an insult to the readers intelligence 3 of those sails should not have been tested as a power wave sail. If they can't even get the criteria right how credible are the results. Waste of cyberspace

stehsegler
WA, 3543 posts
21 Jul 2009 8:33PM
Thumbs Up

Rider5 said...
Re the Bjorn and Antone input comment do you really think they ride their sponsors productions?? I don't.
JP wave boards are pretty flat for wave boards as it is.


Board? Nope... probably quite rare that a riders board makes it as is into production.

Sail? From what I understand there isn't much difference between the production wave sails you can buy in the store and what most pro sailors use.

Overall though I believe that a team riders test and development input will influence what goes into production. Hence my conclusion that if a manufacturer doesn't have any heavier riders on their development team it is not very likely that their higher volume products/ power oriented sails will be tailored towards that market.


stehsegler
WA, 3543 posts
21 Jul 2009 8:35PM
Thumbs Up

Rider5 said...

Just went and checked out the test. The test is an insult to the readers intelligence 3 of those sails should not have been tested as a power wave sail. If they can't even get the criteria right how credible are the results. Waste of cyberspace


Not sure about the test criteria. I think they should have stated why those particular sails were chosen over others. Other mags such as the German "Surf" magazine usually state the reasons. Generally it is because that's what was supplied by the manufacturer.

dan berry
WA, 2562 posts
21 Jul 2009 8:53PM
Thumbs Up

Generally the mags will test whatever gear is given to them, if the manufacturer has quality gear that's available they'll send it for testing. I've heard stories of gear ( with dubious durability) being sent later in the test to avoid the full workout. As far as wavesails go, unless they are testing prototypes the pros are generally riding production sails.
I would be listening to shledgets opinions on this matter as he has vaste experience with being overweight, he also has a signature line of doughnuts. so he knows what he's on about.



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Windsurfing Gear Reviews


"Boardseeker Test: Goya W3D the best wave sail." started by Alberto