Forums > Windsurfing   Gps and Speed talk

wind strength versus temperature

Reply
Created by grumplestiltskin > 9 months ago, 3 Feb 2009
grumplestiltskin
WA, 2331 posts
3 Feb 2009 3:55PM
Thumbs Up

I was having a conversation with someone this morning and he mentioned his feeling if the temperature was high, the windspeed didn't have the same "depth" as when it was cold.
i.e. 25 knots when the temp is say 34 deg does not feel as strong or dense as 25 knots when its only 18 deg.

Is there anything in that, or is it just that you feel more comfortable when the outside temp is warmer and dont get worn out so quickly?

hardie
WA, 4129 posts
3 Feb 2009 4:53PM
Thumbs Up

grumplestiltskin said...

I was having a conversation with someone this morning and he mentioned his feeling if the temperature was high, the windspeed didn't have the same "depth" as when it was cold.
i.e. 25 knots when the temp is say 34 deg does not feel as strong or dense as 25 knots when its only 18 deg.

Is there anything in that, or is it just that you feel more comfortable when the outside temp is warmer and dont get worn out so quickly?


I remember Finian Maynard saying the day he did hid 48 knot world record run which wasn't long after he broke Yellow Pages at 46kts, that the air/wind was much denser on the 48kt day? Don't know about how temperatures affect that tho?

sausage
QLD, 4873 posts
3 Feb 2009 6:04PM
Thumbs Up

Cold air is much denser than hot air i.e. a plane doesn't need to go as fast in cold air than hot to take off. I was once in Birdsville (2003) for work and we had to sit in the Pub for 3 hours until the airstrip surface temperature dropped below 50deg C so we could take off. We were there the day after they had a record 48deg in the shade( this was around the figure I recall)

Hence colder the air the denser it is which means a lot faster for equivalent wind speed. Someone please correct me as this is only an assumption.

Gestalt
QLD, 14627 posts
3 Feb 2009 7:28PM
Thumbs Up

i can't get my head around this denser air is faster thing.

surely 25 knots is 25 knots regardless.


jp747
1553 posts
3 Feb 2009 6:40PM
Thumbs Up

am trying to digest sausages reply too but am sure there's more to it than just his assumption for example why do jet turbines work better in thin air that sort of thing

nebbian
WA, 6277 posts
3 Feb 2009 7:30PM
Thumbs Up

Gestalt said...

i can't get my head around this denser air is faster thing.

surely 25 knots is 25 knots regardless.



I've never understood that either.

Surely if a certain wind strength affects a fan inside a wind meter in a certain way, then it will affect a windsurfing sail the same way? So a hot 25 knots will be the same as a cold 25 knots, regardless of how fast the actual air particles are moving?

swoosh
QLD, 1928 posts
3 Feb 2009 8:48PM
Thumbs Up

Looking at an extreme example. Take water and air. Air has a density of 1.2kg/m3, whereas water is 1000kg/m3. If you aim a stream of air at something vs a stream of water of the same velocity, the stream of water will have a lot more force.

Now so far as air density not effecting a wind meter, the wind meter is inherently designed to have as less friction as possible, hence the amount of force behind the air stream doesn't make any visible difference, as not much force is required to spin the little cups or fan in the windmeter. Windmeters measure wind velocity, not the 'power' of the wind.

Now as far as windsurfing goes, denser air means you can go faster, because in the same wind velocity there is more force/power in the wind, more force means you can overcome the drag forces of the water on your board and fins.

Just out of interest, air is about 7% denser at 15 degrees celcius, then it is at 35 degrees.

I can break out the proper maths if anyone cares :)

vando
QLD, 3418 posts
3 Feb 2009 8:57PM
Thumbs Up

Hmmm well sailing both here in warm lovely QLD and then cold brrrrrrrrr Sandy point i have to say the wind down there feels different it feels very solid compared to up here.

Not so cold down there at the moment though

Ian K
WA, 4155 posts
3 Feb 2009 8:04PM
Thumbs Up

The gas equation PV = nRT explains it all. P is pressure, V is the volume the sample of air is squeezed into, n is the number of molecules of gas, R is a constant and T is the temperature relative to absolute zero - ie -273 dec C ( = 0 deg K). So if the pressure is the same and the temperature rises from say 10 degrees to 40 degrees that's 283 to 313 degrees K or a rise in temperature of 10%.

For the equation to hold the number of molecules in a cubic metre of air must drop by 10%, ie the density drops by 10%. That's 10% less momentum in air moving at the same speed - 10% less force generated so you can up your sail size by 10%.

A cup anemometer with good bearings is free wheeling so will measure pretty much the same windspeed regardless of temperature.

If you use a pitot tube you're measuring the pressure required to stop the air, you'll get a greater reading in cooler air, hence you need to apply a correction for density when using pitot tube based anemometers.

Air pressure also affects density and for a given temperature varies it by a few percent ie 990 hectopascals to 1020 hectpascals ~ 3 % variation there.

If you decide what sail to rig by looking at the whitecaps you don't have to worry about all this.


climber
NSW, 1125 posts
3 Feb 2009 10:11PM
Thumbs Up

Yep Got to go with the cold air dense thing as well.
Cannot explain it as well as Swoosh possibly can, but limited engineering mind agrees
Force is a result of mass and velocity, and hence the greater the mass the greater the force working on an object.
Given this, applying the law of cause and effect, everything has an equal and opposite reaction and hence the greater the force acting on the sail the greater the resulting force acting to the board and hence greater propulsion forwards

Growing up in WA and sailing there for 15yrs in the south west, yes 15knts there is a fine breeze to sail on, and yet here in Qld a 15knt breeze feels very "soft" on hot days.

But the water is warm

cheers Climber

decrepit
WA, 12767 posts
3 Feb 2009 8:11PM
Thumbs Up

I think it's a matter of energy, (mass X speed), so the more energy in the wind, the more sail pressure.

Water is much more dense than air, so that's why the fin needs to be only a fraction of the size of the sail, to generate a similar force.

EDIT, Woops that's what happens when you get distracted, other people answer the question before you.
But I disagree with Swoosh, denser air doesn't necessarily mean you go faster, but it does mean you can use a smaller sail. The available force is never greater than the sailor can counterbalance.

swoosh
QLD, 1928 posts
3 Feb 2009 9:17PM
Thumbs Up

decrepit said...

I think it's a matter of energy, (mass X speed), so the more energy in the wind, the more sail pressure.

Water is much more dense than air, so that's why the fin needs to be only a fraction of the size of the sail, to generate a similar force.


Yeah you are right decrepit it is actually the kinetic energy.

Kinetic Energy = Mass x Velocity^2

Was just trying to keep it easy to understand :)


Goo Screw
VIC, 269 posts
3 Feb 2009 10:25PM
Thumbs Up

I have read that the windmills get more energy from the colder denser air.
Personal experience has given me that feeling,although when the air flow is that cold it tends to work like a down draft and stick to ground level(water level),thus giving you the force where you need it.

Ian K
WA, 4155 posts
3 Feb 2009 8:26PM
Thumbs Up

decrepit said...

I think it's a matter of energy, (mass X speed), so the more energy in the wind, the more sail pressure.

Water is much more dense than air, so that's why the fin needs to be only a fraction of the size of the sail, to generate a similar force.


There should be a speed squared in there decrepit, but it's a bit strange, 30 knots should generate 4 times the sail pressure as 15 knots. Yet we don't use sails of 4 times the area? Also when a 90 kg bloke is powered up on a 5.3 you find 45 kg lassies happily sailing 4.0 ?? What's wrong with the smaller sail sizes? OK the centre of effort is a bit lower in a small sail so easier to control, but doesn't quite add up??

decrepit
WA, 12767 posts
3 Feb 2009 8:36PM
Thumbs Up

Ian, I've been equally perplexed by that for many years, varying the square of windspeed, doesn't bare any resemblance to sail size changes.
And being only 70kg, I can't figure why I have to use almost the same size sail as my mates 20kg heavier.
Be nice if somebody can explain it.

swoosh
QLD, 1928 posts
3 Feb 2009 9:37PM
Thumbs Up

Ian K said...

decrepit said...

I think it's a matter of energy, (mass X speed), so the more energy in the wind, the more sail pressure.

Water is much more dense than air, so that's why the fin needs to be only a fraction of the size of the sail, to generate a similar force.


There should be a speed squared in there decrepit, but it's a bit strange, 30 knots should generate 4 times the sail pressure as 15 knots. Yet we don't use sails of 4 times the area? Also when a 90 kg bloke is powered up on a 5.3 you find 45 kg lassies happily sailing 4.0 ?? What's wrong with the smaller sail sizes? OK the centre of effort is a bit lower in a small sail so easier to control, but doesn't quite add up??



Don't forget drag, which also increases with the square of the speed :)




Ian K
WA, 4155 posts
3 Feb 2009 8:50PM
Thumbs Up

Had a thought while doing the dishes. It's apparent wind that dictates the sail pressure. So reaching at 25 knots in 15 knots of wind with a 7.5 - apparent wind = 29 knots.

Reaching at 25 knots in 30 knots - apparent wind 39 knots so the theoretical sail size for
30 knots = 7.5 / ((39/29)^2 ) = 4.2 ~ about right.

Doesn't explain that other problem of big /little sailors in the same wind though Decrepit.

Gestalt
QLD, 14627 posts
3 Feb 2009 10:05PM
Thumbs Up

Ian K said...

Doesn't explain that other problem of big /little sailors in the same wind though Decrepit.


weight.

a lighter hull require less power to plane.

Gestalt
QLD, 14627 posts
3 Feb 2009 10:11PM
Thumbs Up

i'm onboard with the density thing now.

but it raises more questions.

density is related to temperature.

so shouldn't the density at 12 deg in victoria be the same as 12 deg in qld.

the other thing that no-one has mentioned is pressure gradients

grumplestiltskin
WA, 2331 posts
4 Feb 2009 7:45AM
Thumbs Up

OK, thanks for the science lessons guys.
Guess it all makes sense now

Ian K
WA, 4155 posts
4 Feb 2009 8:44AM
Thumbs Up

Gestalt said...

i'm onboard with the density thing now.

but it raises more questions.

density is related to temperature.

so shouldn't the density at 12 deg in victoria be the same as 12 deg in qld.

the other thing that no-one has mentioned is pressure gradients


Pretty close, you'd just have to look at how much percentage change there is with atmospheric pressure at the two places on the day. There's also humidity which has a small effect. Remember the Aussie cyclist who claimed he lost out on a gold medal due to selecting a too high gear ratio. Claimed it was the humidity making the air denser. But a water molecule has an atomic weight of 18, nitrogen 28 and oxygen 32 - so more water in the mix at the same temperature and pressure makes it less dense. But I don't think it's by much.

sausage
QLD, 4873 posts
4 Feb 2009 10:04AM
Thumbs Up

I think a good example of this in layman's terms is when you put your hand out of the car window at 100km/hr (of course I never go over the speed limit). In hot weather you can hold your hand out easily, dipping it up and down (making aeroplane noises if you wish )........do the same in really cold weather and you have to turn the car around to retrieve your arm that was just ripped from its socket.

EDIT - I suppose you can deduce that this is why people in colder states are much slower than us Queenslanders, and this is qualified by the fact that they have daylight saving just to catch up with us.

Trousers
SA, 565 posts
4 Feb 2009 9:10PM
Thumbs Up

sausage said...

I think a good example of this in layman's terms is when you put your hand out of the car window at 100km/hr (of course I never go over the speed limit). In hot weather you can hold your hand out easily, dipping it up and down (making aeroplane noises if you wish )........do the same in really cold weather and you have to turn the car around to retrieve your arm that was just ripped from its socket.

EDIT - I suppose you can deduce that this is why people in colder states are much slower than us Queenslanders, and this is qualified by the fact that they have daylight saving just to catch up with us.


Also this is why there are lot more one armed people from the south.

kato
VIC, 3507 posts
5 Feb 2009 9:58PM
Thumbs Up

sausage said...

I think a good example of this in layman's terms is when you put your hand out of the car window at 100km/hr (of course I never go over the speed limit). In hot weather you can hold your hand out easily, dipping it up and down (making aeroplane noises if you wish )........do the same in really cold weather and you have to turn the car around to retrieve your arm that was just ripped from its socket.

EDIT - I suppose you can deduce that this is why people in colder states are much slower than us Queenslanders, and this is qualified by the fact that they have daylight saving just to catch up with us.


Sorry, we missed that "slower bit "
http://gpsteamchallenge.com.au/rankings.php?month=01&year=2009

We,ll try and remember that in future

mr love
VIC, 2401 posts
5 Feb 2009 10:55PM
Thumbs Up

Another analogy. Take 2 equal sized balls, one made of styrene foam the other of lead. Drop them on your foot. Which one hurts more?
The denser air travelling at the same velocity "packs more punch"
Thats my take on it.

vando
QLD, 3418 posts
5 Feb 2009 10:08PM
Thumbs Up

kato said...

sausage said...

I think a good example of this in layman's terms is when you put your hand out of the car window at 100km/hr (of course I never go over the speed limit). In hot weather you can hold your hand out easily, dipping it up and down (making aeroplane noises if you wish )........do the same in really cold weather and you have to turn the car around to retrieve your arm that was just ripped from its socket.

EDIT - I suppose you can deduce that this is why people in colder states are much slower than us Queenslanders, and this is qualified by the fact that they have daylight saving just to catch up with us.


Sorry, we missed that "slower bit "
http://gpsteamchallenge.com.au/rankings.php?month=01&year=2009

We,ll try and remember that in future




Yer well you guys still have daylight saving advantage wait till that finishes and we streak ahead of ya

Gestalt
QLD, 14627 posts
5 Feb 2009 10:40PM
Thumbs Up

i think this thread proves a few things once and for all.

1. that 35 knot in qld is the same as 35 knots in WA. [}:)]

2. that qld sailors are faster due to the dissadvantage of less density in the wind

3. that north qld sailors are even faster again

4. that driving with your arm out the window is in fact an armless exercise.

5. that cold weather doesn't mean strong wind

sausage
QLD, 4873 posts
5 Feb 2009 11:08PM
Thumbs Up

kato said...

sausage said...

I think a good example of this in layman's terms is when you put your hand out of the car window at 100km/hr (of course I never go over the speed limit). In hot weather you can hold your hand out easily, dipping it up and down (making aeroplane noises if you wish )........do the same in really cold weather and you have to turn the car around to retrieve your arm that was just ripped from its socket.

EDIT - I suppose you can deduce that this is why people in colder states are much slower than us Queenslanders, and this is qualified by the fact that they have daylight saving just to catch up with us.


Sorry, we missed that "slower bit "
http://gpsteamchallenge.com.au/rankings.php?month=01&year=2009

We,ll try and remember that in future




Ahh no Kato, I inferred physical speed, but really meant mental agility (air is denser so you can't get around as quick) Which really is a bit rich coming from the deep "north"



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Windsurfing   Gps and Speed talk


"wind strength versus temperature" started by grumplestiltskin