Forums > Windsurfing   Gps and Speed talk

Which to schoose: 2005 T1 RS 60 or F2 SX 91L 2006

Reply
Created by einzius > 9 months ago, 5 Sep 2011
einzius
9 posts
5 Sep 2011 8:23PM
Thumbs Up

Hi,

Can you comment about the pros and cons of following speedboards:

Thommen1 RS 60 from 2005

versus

F2 SX 91L from 2006.

I can have them both with equal price, but which one of them has higher potential for crispy speeds? Which one takes better waves? Which is more comfortable to surf?

elmo
WA, 8868 posts
5 Sep 2011 8:36PM
Thumbs Up

The SX'y is very nice indeed

einzius
9 posts
5 Sep 2011 10:32PM
Thumbs Up

What about Thommen RS ?

elmo
WA, 8868 posts
5 Sep 2011 10:38PM
Thumbs Up

Never ridden one.

Owned a SX'y M and loved it, had a lot of fun on that board, ISO's of the time beat it on flat water but the SX reeled them in on the chop, it just loved the bumpy stuff

C3
54 posts
6 Sep 2011 8:36PM
Thumbs Up

i had a RS60 and never really liked it.
the board has a weird balance and i think the cut outs were too big and deep.
it had very little pitch stability. i filled in the cut outs and the board was faster AND more controllable for me.

in retrospect i would say it is a "typical Bjorn board". i can see it working fairly well for someone of Bjorn's power and weight and sails with lots of mast foot pressure.

Boogie

einzius
9 posts
7 Sep 2011 6:52PM
Thumbs Up

Hi C3,

Thanks for information. What is your weight? Which windrange was comfortable for you to sail with it? What size of sail? How much speed difference did it make when you filled the cutouts? Do you have a picture of the filled cutouts?

djl070
WA, 290 posts
8 Sep 2011 9:09AM
Thumbs Up

elmo said...

Never ridden one.

Owned a SX'y M and loved it, had a lot of fun on that board, ISO's of the time beat it on flat water but the SX reeled them in on the chop, it just loved the bumpy stuff


Have to agree with Elmo,I have three of the SX's and they are great in chop and can be muscled quite alot without ever getting bent out of shape,like all slalom boards they liked to be fully powered up and seem to perform better the harder you push them,also the volume distribution is excellant and the boards feel bigger than the actual volume.

C3
54 posts
8 Sep 2011 10:14PM
Thumbs Up

einzius said...

Hi C3,

Thanks for information. What is your weight? Which windrange was comfortable for you to sail with it? What size of sail? How much speed difference did it make when you filled the cutouts? Do you have a picture of the filled cutouts?


at that time my weight was around 92kg
favourite windrange was 15 to 28kn
sails i used on that board was 5.8, 6.2, 6.6, 7.6, but sweet sizes were 6.2 and 6.6
for slalom sailing fins around 32 and 34 worked best.

can't remember how much faster it was with filled cutouts, but it was significant.

i don't have a picture anymore of the filled in cut outs, but i basically just shaped some closed cell foam and glued it into the conical cutouts and faired it over with filler and sandable primer. i faired out the rocker line at the same time which was quite a bit off.

that board would be 6 years old now... are you sure you want to buy a board that old. it should be so cheap that you buy it just to try it? can't be much more than a hundred Euros...

Boogie

einzius
9 posts
9 Sep 2011 6:19PM
Thumbs Up

Hi,

Yeah, the board is 100€ exactly with some small damage under the bottom. F2 SX has a big crack on the deck, but I am able to repair it, since I handle composites anyway. I bought both of them. One for me and other managed to organize to a fellow windsurfer. I´ll see which performs the best. I think filling the cut-outs is good idea, because the back-end floatability rises with it a lot? I´ll try to keep small cutouts. With height like 10 mm. What do you think about that?



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Windsurfing   Gps and Speed talk


"Which to schoose: 2005 T1 RS 60 or F2 SX 91L 2006" started by einzius