Forums > Windsurfing   Gps and Speed talk

Speed potential of twin fins?

Reply
Created by Ian K > 9 months ago, 8 Jul 2011
Ian K
WA, 4155 posts
8 Jul 2011 8:32AM
Thumbs Up

I reckon fin drag is over-rated, fins went short to balance the narrow hulls rather than for drag reduction. But the short fins with a standard aspect ratio were a little small in area for comfort. So now we have short, low-aspect speed fins. Plenty of area but the centre of lift is still at the right spot to balance narrow hulls.

Could you achieve the same with twin fins of the same length but with standard aspect ratios? Tip vortice losses vs. aspect ratio gains, who knows the technical details?


I've seen twinzer waveboards go pretty fast, that quads even go at all has to say something.

What would be the advantages? Not much. If one catches a bit of weed the other might keep you in control. But twice the chance of catching weed.

There's been a lot of backyard experimentation with single speed and weed fins because it's easy. Putting an extra fin box in a board is messy so not much experimentation goes on.

Here's one from the archives. Who remembers this?





sick_em_rex
NSW, 1600 posts
8 Jul 2011 11:53AM
Thumbs Up

looks like MVM's fin after he broke 50 knots.....

slowboat
WA, 560 posts
8 Jul 2011 10:13AM
Thumbs Up

sick_em_rex said...

looks like MVM's fin after he broke 50 knots.....


yoyo
WA, 1646 posts
8 Jul 2011 1:39PM
Thumbs Up

You don't need much fin surface area at 50knots. That X2 21 of MvM is probably 150cm2.

The X2 was about 6mm thick at the base. If you had 2 fins to give that area they would probably be too thin to be strong enough and not long enough to keep the windward rail up.

Ian K
WA, 4155 posts
8 Jul 2011 2:05PM
Thumbs Up

slowboat said...

sick_em_rex said...

looks like MVM's fin after he broke 50 knots.....





after! So it was a hoax!

Strewth is stranger than Friction!

slowboat
WA, 560 posts
8 Jul 2011 5:17PM
Thumbs Up

Ian K said...

I reckon fin drag is over-rated, fins went short to balance the narrow hulls rather than for drag reduction. But the short fins with a standard aspect ratio were a little small in area for comfort. So now we have short, low-aspect speed fins. Plenty of area but the centre of lift is still at the right spot to balance narrow hulls.


I reckon ya missing a few things...

fins were short and fat in the '80s then went longer to balance wider boards. The fin area was large cos we spent more time going slow, and nobody knew any better in the sport- back then 30kts was record fast. At the low lift coefficients/angles of attack we are constrained to (for various reasons) the mechanics are pretty well understood.

Xfoil (when set up correctly) has been well correlated with tank tests and gives a pretty good ballpark of actual performance. At low angles of attack/lift coefficients, the 3D effects are actually quite minimal and total lift and drag forces are relatively easy to predict.

I reckon 4-6kg of drag is a lot. Thats what ya get with lots of surface area (say one of these silly delta style fins) dragging through the water at low angles of attack... not so significant if you are a 110kg neanderthal.

I'll stick to my single, short, low surface area, thin carbon fins thanks

grumplestiltskin
WA, 2331 posts
8 Jul 2011 5:30PM
Thumbs Up

slowboat said...
not so significant if you are a 110kg neanderthal.


Hey, I resemble that!

Ian K
WA, 4155 posts
8 Jul 2011 6:46PM
Thumbs Up

slowboat said...

I reckon ya missing a few things...

fins were short and fat in the '80s then went longer to balance wider boards. The fin area was large cos we spent more time going slow, and nobody knew any better in the sport- back then 30kts was record fast.



I was at my peak in the '80s - 30 is still fast, but young fellas come down to the lake and clear 40. We gather on the beach and compare fins. They don't make sense to me.

So if low aspect fins compromise so much on drag are they just popular because they're more secure against spin out?

I did a bit of research on the internet, scaling with a ruler. Here's the approximate aspect ratios of the fins used by 2011 top 10 on GPS-speedsurfing

No. 1 97kg 1.5:1
No.2 98kg 1.5:1
No.3 98kg 3.3:1
No.4 97kg 3.3:1
No.5 92kg 1.5:1
N0.6 95kg 3.7:1
No.7 78kg 3.2:1
No.8 106kg 2:1
No.9 92 kg 1.5:1
No.10 80kg 2:1 (go Kato !!)

I'm now very curious about MvM's fin. Does he have a wicked sense of humour? I clearly remember it portrayed as the 50 knot fin. All mention of this aspect of the record run has now disappeared from the internet. I thought stuff in cyberspace stayed forever. Who else remembers?







jsnfok
WA, 899 posts
8 Jul 2011 8:17PM
Thumbs Up

grumplestiltskin said...

slowboat said...
not so significant if you are a 110kg neanderthal.


Hey, I resemble that!


same, not by choice tho

Spotty
VIC, 1619 posts
9 Jul 2011 12:02AM
Thumbs Up

No. 1 97kg 1.5:1
No.2 98kg 1.5:1
No.3 98kg 3.3:1
No.4 97kg 3.3:1
No.5 92kg 1.5:1
N0.6 95kg 3.7:1
No.7 78kg 3.2:1
No.8 106kg 2:1
No.9 92 kg 1.5:1
No.10 80kg 2:1 (go Kato !!)


No.8 is more like 111kg now, then add wetsuit, harness, helmut, weight jacket, bolt on some balls of steel, add moisture to the neanderthal and he is pushing 120kg.

The '09 record was done with record flab/weight at the time over 120kg

Troppo
WA, 887 posts
9 Jul 2011 6:57AM
Thumbs Up

Spotty said...




No.8 is more like 111kg now, then add wetsuit, harness, helmut, weight jacket, bolt on some balls of steel, add moisture to the neanderthal and he is pushing 120kg.

The '09 record was done with record flab/weight at the time over 120kg


You don't get to 120kg eating salad!

Bonominator
VIC, 5477 posts
9 Jul 2011 9:42AM
Thumbs Up

Troppo said...

Spotty said...




No.8 is more like 111kg now, then add wetsuit, harness, helmut, weight jacket, bolt on some balls of steel, add moisture to the neanderthal and he is pushing 120kg.

The '09 record was done with record flab/weight at the time over 120kg


You don't get to 120kg eating salad!


You do if it's Caesar Supreme

Spotty
VIC, 1619 posts
9 Jul 2011 10:13AM
Thumbs Up

Mmmmmmmm Doughnuts, and 50 knots on the menu this weekend.

Twins, being shorter in depth ain't going to help for control when they lose contact with the water when your skipping over the back of rolling chop. Usually run a bigger deeper fin for chop. But hey give it a go might be be good for tighter flat course conditions.

Te Hau
493 posts
9 Jul 2011 5:29PM
Thumbs Up

not so significant if you are a 110kg neanderthal........

........No way to talk about the men from Pays Bas.

slowboat
WA, 560 posts
9 Jul 2011 7:01PM
Thumbs Up

I think differences in sailing conditions and small sample space might "cloud" those results a bit. If you look a bit further back (say 5 years) you'd find that the "new" low aspect fins arent actually faster than the stuff we've been using for years. Just because they are the only thing available on the market doesnt mean they are a faster design. And there arent any lightweight guys going fast on these fins either . The fast results on these fins are coming from big guys in a flat land that has been very windy the last year. Hopefully the wind will be back down here tomorrow

slowboat
WA, 560 posts
9 Jul 2011 7:06PM
Thumbs Up

as for MvM's fin I dont recall him ever saying that it looked like that during his run... only that it was the fin he used and thats what it looked like afterwards. Its pretty easy to smash into a bank at the end of the run when its broad.

Serge Beumer
11 posts
11 Jul 2011 11:19PM
Thumbs Up

Hi guys,

That's the pic I took of Martin's C3 X2 21 after he did his record run with it in Southend 2007 with MS TR-3 5.1 and Naish Speed Pro 60 production Speedboard.
I was not there but Martin told me he first ruined it on a reef and then did the run.

Serge Beumer
The Flat Land

slowboat
WA, 560 posts
12 Jul 2011 11:39AM
Thumbs Up

SWS
SA, 196 posts
17 Jul 2011 7:17AM
Thumbs Up

I sail twin fin freeride boards and have really noticed the extra control and comfort they give you thus helping you to go fast. I have snapped a few fins as well and as I have only ever lost one at a time am always able to sail back.

I have been thinking about getting a more speed orientated twin fin maybe fit it with asymmetrical fins just to see how fast it will go.

choco
SA, 4175 posts
17 Jul 2011 4:15PM
Thumbs Up

if you run 2 real small assy fins in a board would you need a port tack assy and a starboard assy in the board ?

SWS
SA, 196 posts
17 Jul 2011 4:56PM
Thumbs Up

That is how I was thinking of setting it up. I guess if you were going down a speed course you would only go with what ever tack was needed for the course.

Ian K
WA, 4155 posts
17 Jul 2011 8:13PM
Thumbs Up

That depends.

Is the difference in the lift to drag ratio of an asymmetric fin and a symmetric fin greater than the difference in lift to drag ratio of a symmetric fin and an asymmetric fin on the wrong tack?

Those CFD packages should be able to answer that question. If the answer is yes then one of each would be best for all round sailing.


The Lessacher weed fins get good reviews and they use a port and starboard mix of asymmetric foils so maybe the answer to the question is yes.

Hey SWS, who makes a twin fin freeride board?

SWS
SA, 196 posts
18 Jul 2011 10:15AM
Thumbs Up

I am getting one made up by OES but the ones I sail currently are hifly madd's.

Ian K
WA, 4155 posts
18 Jul 2011 9:59AM
Thumbs Up

SWS said...

I am getting one made up by OES but the ones I sail currently are hifly madd's.


Checked out their convincing web page. They do mention the relationship between footstrap position and fin depth. Hence they only have an inboard footstrap option.

Which raises another point - all performance boards have footstraps in the maximum outboard position. It's as if we always end up using the longest fin possible for that width board. So why have wingers never really caught on for windsurfers? At least in flat water you should be able to keep them clear of the water.

How would a 50 cm wide board with wingers allowing for a formula board stance go? You'd need a 50 - 70 cm fin. Might be pretty quick in moderate winds.



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Windsurfing   Gps and Speed talk


"Speed potential of twin fins?" started by Ian K