Forums > Windsurfing General

Strong Construction

Reply
Created by choco > 9 months ago, 1 Jun 2010
choco
SA, 4175 posts
1 Jun 2010 8:54PM
Thumbs Up

Mobydisc
NSW, 9029 posts
1 Jun 2010 9:27PM
Thumbs Up

choco
SA, 4175 posts
1 Jun 2010 8:58PM
Thumbs Up

Mobydisc said...



lol

elmo
WA, 8868 posts
1 Jun 2010 8:23PM
Thumbs Up

sailpilot
QLD, 785 posts
1 Jun 2010 10:30PM
Thumbs Up

And do we have a winner.....yes its the hammer!

saltiest1
NSW, 2557 posts
1 Jun 2010 10:31PM
Thumbs Up

moby called it.


hang on, this isnt one of docs conspiracy things is it???

WINDY MILLER
WA, 3183 posts
2 Jun 2010 7:24AM
Thumbs Up

Ha ha ha......Reminds me of a certain WA custom board builder......


Mike the Hammer ha ha ha ha


Rider5
WA, 567 posts
2 Jun 2010 8:43AM
Thumbs Up

Yo you makin me sound like a rapper

windaddict
VIC, 1121 posts
2 Jun 2010 4:00PM
Thumbs Up

So if Dyneema is so much stronger than traditional construction methods for boards, why is it not widely used today? What are the downsides? From watching the vid it would seem to be very resilient to dings.

The Windsurfing Shed
NSW, 294 posts
2 Jun 2010 8:22PM
Thumbs Up

windaddict said...

So if Dyneema is so much stronger than traditional construction methods for boards, why is it not widely used today? What are the downsides? From watching the vid it would seem to be very resilient to dings.



Marco Copello used it up until 1993 on his cutoms and gave it up as its performance decreases dramatically with time.

It is high density polyethylene with excellent tensile and crushing strengths, hence used as kiting lines but as it is a polyolefin its surface does not bond well with resin.

Remi

P.C_simpson
WA, 1491 posts
2 Jun 2010 8:20PM
Thumbs Up

But i like how he beats up all boards which are heaps older and looks like they have lived there whole life in the sun and all old and crispy..

NotWal
QLD, 7430 posts
2 Jun 2010 11:37PM
Thumbs Up

I thought epoxy composites lasted more or less forever as long as they have some kind of sun shield like a coat of paint.

As for Dyneema, I've heard that its a pain to work with - difficult to cut and impossible to sand.

keef
NSW, 2016 posts
3 Jun 2010 12:26AM
Thumbs Up

NotWal said....

As for Dyneema, I've heard that its a pain to work with - difficult to cut and impossible to sand.
impossible to sand that's great, ive been useing a light weight satin weave over the carbon in the layup&filler coat,so you don't sand down to the carbon

NotWal
QLD, 7430 posts
3 Jun 2010 6:49PM
Thumbs Up

keef said...

NotWal said....

As for Dyneema, I've heard that its a pain to work with - difficult to cut and impossible to sand.
impossible to sand that's great, ive been useing a light weight satin weave over the carbon in the layup&filler coat,so you don't sand down to the carbon




Impossible to sand in that it goes furry and you cant get rid of the fur. Probably not what you want Keef. But I have no first hand experience.

choco
SA, 4175 posts
3 Jun 2010 6:24PM
Thumbs Up

NotWal said...

keef said...

NotWal said....

As for Dyneema, I've heard that its a pain to work with - difficult to cut and impossible to sand.
impossible to sand that's great, ive been useing a light weight satin weave over the carbon in the layup&filler coat,so you don't sand down to the carbon




Impossible to sand in that it goes furry and you cant get rid of the fur. Probably not what you want Keef. But I have no first hand experience.


why wouldn't you use it in a way where you don't actually sand it?

keef
NSW, 2016 posts
3 Jun 2010 7:30PM
Thumbs Up

NotWal said...

keef said...

NotWal said....

As for Dyneema, I've heard that its a pain to work with - difficult to cut and impossible to sand.
impossible to sand that's great, ive been useing a light weight satin weave over the carbon in the layup&filler coat,so you don't sand down to the carbon




Impossible to sand in that it goes furry and you cant get rid of the fur. Probably not what you want Keef. But I have no first hand experience.
notwal satin weave is much the same, the fine weave doesnt fluff up as much as the heavy weave, the problem with carbon is it is very soft and easy to sand, so when your sanding the fillercoat its easy to sand the carbon , allso what you will find with the satin weave its a very tight nitted cloth and when its layed up with the carbon you dont need as much filler, i think the point is that, if you sand down and the glass goes furry you can't sand any further so you have to apply more filler, to me it makes sense
after saying that if you sand satin weave dry it will can fluff up if you use wet&dry with a detergent it wont fluff, up i hope that makes sense

mathew
QLD, 2133 posts
3 Jun 2010 10:46PM
Thumbs Up

If you wanted a "fluffy sanding layer", use some kevlar... then you wont ever sand through to the carbon...

slowboat
WA, 560 posts
3 Jun 2010 9:56PM
Thumbs Up

thats a useful video. I often encounter furiously flying hammers when I'm sailing. If you put 10 layers of $2/m polyester from spotlight on there it would be hard to break with a hammer. I bet that board is so heavy it breaks roofracks.

Kevlar and dyneema are really great for holding the two pieces of broken board together. Its also good for smashing things over rocks. hmmm I generally sail on water not rocks. Its good for the bottom of whitewater kayaks though.

Carbon cracks really easily but is very stiff and strong for the weight (good where there arent hard point loads like rocks or flying hammers), glass is pretty good allround despite being so unmodern. Using glass and carbon you can make an extremely light board with good structural properties- except when faced with a flying hammer.

choco
SA, 4175 posts
4 Jun 2010 7:58AM
Thumbs Up

slowboat said...

thats a useful video. I often encounter furiously flying hammers when I'm sailing. If you put 10 layers of $2/m polyester from spotlight on there it would be hard to break with a hammer. I bet that board is so heavy it breaks roofracks.

Kevlar and dyneema are really great for holding the two pieces of broken board together. Its also good for smashing things over rocks. hmmm I generally sail on water not rocks. Its good for the bottom of whitewater kayaks though.

Carbon cracks really easily but is very stiff and strong for the weight (good where there arent hard point loads like rocks or flying hammers), glass is pretty good allround despite being so unmodern. Using glass and carbon you can make an extremely light board with good structural properties- except when faced with a flying hammer.


In my case i do have this problem because everytime i sail i have to dodge a "Hamma"

Jens
WA, 345 posts
4 Jun 2010 9:57AM
Thumbs Up

Hi Folks,

Another thing to consider is that impact resistance isn't all there is to making a resilient board. I've been sailing a carbon kevlar Mistral twinnie pretty hard for the last 2 years or so, and have been really happy with it's impact resistance. In all that time I never managed to ding it, which is definitely a record for me, because there are always encounters with the reef. However, at the end of the summer season I did have to take a saw to the board and cut out a large soft patch between the footstraps where your gybing foot goes. No big deal really, but it's the first time I've had to repair a board I haven't actually dinged.

Anyone else notice that the carbon kevlar constructions go soft in areas where you repeatedly stand, or was this just an instance where the manufacturer probably should have added extra divinycell?

Cheers, Jens

Squid Lips
WA, 708 posts
4 Jun 2010 8:45PM
Thumbs Up

Jens said...


Anyone else notice that the carbon kevlar constructions go soft in areas where you repeatedly stand, or was this just an instance where the manufacturer probably should have added extra divinycell?



I have just recently found the same thing on my F2, same place. It's only got a tiny bit of give so I'm going to try the injected expanding foam trick. I was wondering if the carbon/kevlar is only under the straps and it has failed in the less reinforced area. Or maybe the soft deck is worse under there but can't tell because of the pads...

LeStef
ACT, 514 posts
4 Jun 2010 11:00PM
Thumbs Up

If I was to use a hammer, I would definitely go for epoxy.
Much more rewarding for those frustrating days...

latedropeddy
VIC, 417 posts
5 Jun 2010 12:36AM
Thumbs Up

that dude has a calibrated arm and hammer?

Anyone know where to buy dyneema from? is it expensive?

Waiting4wind
NSW, 1871 posts
5 Jun 2010 12:28PM
Thumbs Up

I do remeber a long while back that the Board mags used to test impact resistance of boards. They dropped a metal object on them from a specific height and measured the resulting indent / damage.

It would be good to see the results of this sort of test on current boards but I'm sure that the suppliers wouldn't appreciate having their boards dented.

Rider5
WA, 567 posts
5 Jun 2010 12:35PM
Thumbs Up

Jens said...



Anyone else notice that the carbon kevlar constructions go soft in areas where you repeatedly stand, or was this just an instance where the manufacturer probably should have added extra divinycell?

Cheers, Jens


Higher density and thicker divinycell would help.

Ive repaired many snapped carbon kevlar board and sanding the stuff is a real b1tch

Mark _australia
WA, 23437 posts
5 Jun 2010 1:14PM
Thumbs Up

Agreed - it is not the fault of carbon or kevlar - it is thin divinycell and/or low density styro

sailquik
VIC, 6165 posts
6 Jun 2010 12:55AM
Thumbs Up

Dyneema and Kevlar are similar polymer fibers. Extremely strong under tension. Almost impossible to cut with normal scissors unless razor sharp. I used Kevlar a lot in the hulls of whitewater Kayaks but always with Vinalester or epoxy resins. Polyester is not strong enough or flexible enough to take advantage of the fiber properties. We only used carbon to add stiffness. It has little puncture resistance in comparison. That is why Kevlar is used in ballistic vests and carbon is not.
Kevlar is very light though and we tried using it on Polyurethane core boards but we always had to use a layer of glass over it to sand.
I think Kevlar and/or Dyneema are often used in the rails and other impact areas of moulded or semi moulded composite windsurfers. Used against a mould there is no need for sanding. Used in a foam composite it is relatively easy to dent if the underlying foam is soft, but very hard to penetrate or tear. Using in combination with carbon adds stiffness. We sometimes used carbon/Kevlar combination weave in lightweight whitewater boats but man was it expensive!! It sure does look cool under a clear gell coat though.

Gestalt
QLD, 14627 posts
6 Jun 2010 1:20AM
Thumbs Up

i get all of my boards with timber veneer in the external layup, i like the feel of the boards flex in chop and it's very tough with impact.

i wonder if bamboo is even better.

NotWal
QLD, 7430 posts
6 Jun 2010 11:01PM
Thumbs Up

I reckon Kevlar and Dyneema might be just the thing for the front end of battens.
Springy wave sails need a bit of wind to pop some shape into them and turn them on.
Glass battens have to be fairly thick or they break so they tend to be a bit stiff in the luff end. Dyneema would allow the battens to taper to a thinner more flexible end.

FormulaNova
WA, 15084 posts
6 Jun 2010 9:21PM
Thumbs Up

Squid Lips said...


I have just recently found the same thing on my F2, same place. It's only got a tiny bit of give so I'm going to try the injected expanding foam trick. I was wondering if the carbon/kevlar is only under the straps and it has failed in the less reinforced area. Or maybe the soft deck is worse under there but can't tell because of the pads...


I repaired the soft deck of my Hifly madd, and it had a carbon/kevlar weave in that area. It was quite stiff, but the styrofoam below had given way, and I just figured it was from repeated flexing from some fat bloke on the board.

I used 2-part foam and it was as good as ever. I also replaced the footstrap inserts and in doing that I saw how the 2-part foam was distributed. It was pretty impressive to see it fill in small cracks/voids between the foam.

I can't remember how many holes I drilled to do this, but it was a lot. I also added 2 more layers of carbon and 2 of glass, so it is now probably a bit heavier, but strong. I hope it lasts another few years after this sort of repair.

Jens
WA, 345 posts
8 Jun 2010 11:33AM
Thumbs Up

Hi Formula,

I had the same issue, but took at different approach. At 1st I thought I'd get away with drilling holes and re-filling, but when I did that the holes just wouldn't stop dripping water. I figured I'd bever get a dry board unless i took drastic action, so I took out a saw, and cut away the central area between the front and rear straps. Like others I noted that while the carbon kevlar hull was still intact, the polystyrene foam underneath had given way. After the board dried properly i sanded the foam down until it was flat and frirm, and then started filling with layers of divinycell, glass and carbon kevlar. Like others I found I couldn't sand the kevlar, so had to put more glass ontop. Not as pretty as it was, but very, very solid now, with little noticeable weight gain.

Cheers, Jens



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Windsurfing General


"Strong Construction" started by choco