Forums > Windsurfing General

Does anyone still use std dia masts, and why?

Reply
Created by GazMan > 9 months ago, 8 Sep 2009
longwinded
WA, 347 posts
9 Sep 2009 8:11PM
Thumbs Up

RDM is witchcraft - smaller diameter for same weight and strength!!! Theres no way this should work!!! Someone please .sort out string theory and quantum gravity so we can answer this question and travel the universe through wormholes.

Plus SDM works fine for me!

nebbian
WA, 6277 posts
9 Sep 2009 8:15PM
Thumbs Up

RDM's have thicker walls, so cam wear isn't as much of an issue. They're also a bit heavier...

A narrower mast means a more efficient foil (I think).

One sticking point is that many cammed sails only set well on SDM, you have to look hard to find a decent racing sail that sets on a RDM.

Swings and roundabouts, they last longer in the waves, and if I use RDM's for flat water as well then I only need three masts instead of six...

Mark _australia
WA, 23436 posts
9 Sep 2009 11:09PM
Thumbs Up

longwinded said...

RDM is witchcraft - smaller diameter for same weight and strength!!! Theres no way this should work!!! .

Plus SDM works fine for me!


Simple.

If you bend two tubes the same amount, the walls of the fatter tube have to stretch more to achieve that same bend.

Sidenote:

string theory Rubbish
and quantum gravity Well quantum means amount and yes we have sorted out the amount of gravity we have. Just enough, and not too much.
travel the universe through wormholes hmmm. I'd rather take the bus, i don't think i'd fit in a wormhole... if you wanna try you go for it but be reminded that it may be painful for the worm, and illegal.

GazMan
WA, 847 posts
10 Sep 2009 1:12AM
Thumbs Up

Phew!!! 33 responses to my original post in one day, SDM vs RDM obviously a hot topic!

My situation (reason for original post):

3 sails in quiver - NP Combat 4.4, KA Koyote 5.3 & Tushingham Lightning 6.0

NP & Tushie designed to work best with SDM (emailed Tushingham re ideal mast - answer was high carbon 430/21 SDM)

KA supposedly works well with either SDM or RDM (currently using NP 430 X6 SDM)

Usually I'm a tight-arse when it comes to outlaying money on gear as I don't usually have a lot of disposable income to play with (always preferred good secondhand stuff). Fortunately, I've received a sizeable inheritance and can afford to update to a new mast (or masts), plus new extensions and boom (awaiting delivery of my 'dream' board at present), though I still want to get the best mast/s to suit my current sail quiver (have considered changing Combat if new mast doesn't suit). Also, the whole mast compatibility issue has got me wondering what to do with a mixed brand sail quiver, everybody has a different opinion of what works best with what!

Many people would appear to use their gear (particularly masts) until they break according to comments from some, though I live 400kms from the nearest windsurf shop and the coastline I often sail around is very rocky so self preservation is very important element here! I've used the mast in pic below around 6-8 times since noticing hairline cracks below ferrule, and even though NP have assured me the cracks are only cosmetic, I'm ready to update to a new mast!

QUESTION - If money was no object and you wanted to get a new mast (or masts) which best suited the sails I mentioned previously, would you go RDM or stick with SDM?







Mark _australia
WA, 23436 posts
10 Sep 2009 9:50AM
Thumbs Up

Gaz

I would change tack - having all sails the same is nice, your quiver has very different handling sails. Strongly consider getting all the same sails.
For about the price of 2 new RDM's, you can probably get 3 x 1y/o sails and 2 x 1 y/o RDM's.
I know it is tempting to buy all new shiny stuff but if I had 3 different sails I'd not be buying a couple of Ezzy RDM's.

IMHO

keef
NSW, 2016 posts
10 Sep 2009 12:00PM
Thumbs Up

i use a loft430 rdm on my n/p 5/8rss and 6.2 rs , a guy borrowed my gear and he wasnt aware the 6.2 was rigged on a skinny, he allso uses a 6.2 rs rigged on a x9 , he was suprised it was rigged on a skinny because he couldnt tell the difference

ka72
QLD, 581 posts
10 Sep 2009 2:48PM
Thumbs Up

I'd go RDM, especially as your largest sail is a 6m. I have 2 RDM masts which I use with my 6.6m, 5.3m and 4.7m (none of these have cams) I have a SDM which I use with my 7.5m KA Koncept which has 3 cams.

DunkO
NSW, 1147 posts
10 Sep 2009 3:20PM
Thumbs Up

garyk said...

Its all about sacrifice.

Most people, smoke, drink, gamble, go out for dinner, buy fancy cars and so on.....

If you really loved windsurfing you would only have to give up one bad habit to buy new kit maybe every 2 or 3 years.


Hmmm.. i think i'll keep buying second hand gear in near new condition that is only a few years old for a fraction of the price, that leaves me with plenty of cash to smoke, drink, gamble, go out for dinner and... oh.. no wait, i also think fancy cars are a waist of money.

and back to the topic, in the short time i've been windsurfing i have broken 3, bought new, sdm masts and still have in perfect nick the two rdm that i bought second hand. so rdm all the way especially in waves

Richiefish
QLD, 5610 posts
10 Sep 2009 3:31PM
Thumbs Up

I buy 2nd hand gear BUT, never again a 2nd hand mast.....(unless I know its owner/history)...

DunkO
NSW, 1147 posts
10 Sep 2009 3:35PM
Thumbs Up

garyk said...

Mmmm There is consistancy in this forum

This is off topic but I have to get it of my chest.

Each to there own and I understand that things are tight at the moment "BUT"
Its a cheap sport compared to others and if we all ride 90's and early 2000's gear where does that leave our sport in the future. UP S##T CREEK.

We might have to import old gear from some other countries where they give a F because there wont be any half decent gear around here and watch our sport die


i believe buying second hand gear does support the sport.
if no one bought other peoples old stuff then the buyer of new gear would not have there purchase subsidized by the sale of their old gear.

or should we just put all the old windsurfers into land fill.



king of the point
WA, 1836 posts
10 Sep 2009 1:52PM
Thumbs Up

All my old Masts fat diameter are used to hold tents up or wind direction things.

Reduced diamiter are the go ,finer entery through the wind ,and and give the rig a lighter feel when throwing it around, sweeter balance...........there pritty dam strong .......hard to bust.

Also you really want to get a set of rigs of the same brand.

But even then a skinny will feel better ................sailing and gyding.

one thing you will notice is the mast sleeve will and can become full of water and you will have to swim up the rig further to get it out of the water and or wait longer when its stuck under water , although this is a little determined on the cut and width of the sleeve in your riggs case for a fat mast ,,,,,!!!!!

aNY EXTRA WEIGHT IN THIS AREA ie water in the sleeve half a liter requires extra energy .
to pop it out of the water and to recoverit as you have to swim further up th mast to pop it out and then back before water starting
Which ****s me especially if you have had rigs can pop out easly with one hand on the boom

Becomes very noticible year to year when different mast sleeve widths are used.

This can make the difference between geting taken out by a monster wave and or getting going

Gestalt
QLD, 14627 posts
10 Sep 2009 3:58PM
Thumbs Up

nebbian said...

RDM's have thicker walls, so cam wear isn't as much of an issue. They're also a bit heavier...

A narrower mast means a more efficient foil (I think).

One sticking point is that many cammed sails only set well on SDM, you have to look hard to find a decent racing sail that sets on a RDM.

Swings and roundabouts, they last longer in the waves, and if I use RDM's for flat water as well then I only need three masts instead of six...


admin!!!!

cool magool.....

GazMan
WA, 847 posts
10 Sep 2009 6:32PM
Thumbs Up

Mark _australia said...

Gaz

I would change tack - having all sails the same is nice, your quiver has very different handling sails. Strongly consider getting all the same sails.
For about the price of 2 new RDM's, you can probably get 3 x 1y/o sails and 2 x 1 y/o RDM's.
I know it is tempting to buy all new shiny stuff but if I had 3 different sails I'd not be buying a couple of Ezzy RDM's.

IMHO


Mark,

I've had numerous same brand sail quivers in my 25+ years of windsurfing and whilst what you're proposing sounds good in theory, it doesn't always work out that way (e.g. previous NP Combat and Excess sails handled very differently and my old 5 cam NP race sail was a completely different animal to these!), unless your lucky enough to be able to try before you buy which I've never had the opportunity to do.

Actually, you'd be surprised how similar my 5.3 KA Koyote and 6.0 Tushingham Lightning feel (when rigged on a NP 430 X6) if you had the chance to try them. The Koyote performs just like a smaller version of the Lightning minus cams. Koyote may sacrifice a bit of top end stability with no cams (though gains a lot of durability from full x-ply construction) but they're both very much similar in feel when blasting around.

I have considered selling the 6.0 Lightning and getting a 6.6 Koyote to make my 3 sail quiver a bit more brand/model consistent but the Lightning is such a nice freeride sail that I will probably wait until I trash it before updating!

MikeyS
VIC, 1509 posts
11 Sep 2009 9:52PM
Thumbs Up

garyk said...

Its all about sacrifice.

Most people, smoke, drink, gamble, go out for dinner, buy fancy cars and so on.....

If you really loved windsurfing you would only have to give up one bad habit to buy new kit maybe every 2 or 3 years.


Just think how many RDMs I could buy each year if I pulled both daughters out of private school.

Yeah, you're right. It is all about sacrifice. Time for them to make a few sacrifices. (Might just sell their horse while I'm at it.)

NotWal
QLD, 7430 posts
11 Sep 2009 10:17PM
Thumbs Up

longwinded said...

RDM is witchcraft - smaller diameter for same weight and strength!!! Theres no way this should work!!! Someone please .sort out string theory and quantum gravity so we can answer this question and travel the universe through wormholes.

Plus SDM works fine for me!


They are not the same weight. If you compare an SDM with an RDM of the same specs for length stiffness and carbon content and prepreg layup the RDM will be a bit heavier. They are making RDMs for non wave use these days and they are as light as they can make them. The equivalent SDM is a bit lighter but more fragile.

I think what is happening with masts is the prepreg high modulus carbon that they use in the most expensive masts enables them to make the walls very thin. In the case of SDMs it is arguably too thin. That's my guess :)

Best value for money non wave use is SDM.

NotWal
QLD, 7430 posts
11 Sep 2009 10:18PM
Thumbs Up

MikeyS said...

garyk said...

Its all about sacrifice.

Most people, smoke, drink, gamble, go out for dinner, buy fancy cars and so on.....

If you really loved windsurfing you would only have to give up one bad habit to buy new kit maybe every 2 or 3 years.


Just think how many RDMs I could buy each year if I pulled both daughters out of private school.

Yeah, you're right. It is all about sacrifice. Time for them to make a few sacrifices. (Might just sell their horse while I'm at it.)


If you were a REAL windsurfer you would pimp for them :)

Sailhack
VIC, 5000 posts
12 Sep 2009 3:57PM
Thumbs Up

^^^
(I can't believe you said that!)

GazMan
WA, 847 posts
12 Sep 2009 4:22PM
Thumbs Up

ka72 said...

I'd go RDM, especially as your largest sail is a 6m. I have 2 RDM masts which I use with my 6.6m, 5.3m and 4.7m (none of these have cams) I have a SDM which I use with my 7.5m KA Koncept which has 3 cams.


ka72,

Only problem is, I've recently discovered that my 6.0 Tushingham Lightning probably won't work that well on an RDM due to fact that it's not possible to get RDM cams for the sail and also because it was designed to go on a SD mast.

The 6.6m, 5.3m and 4.7m you mentioned, are they KA's? I have an 08 5.3 Koyote and have considered getting a 6.6 Koyote to replace the Lightning if I end up switching to RDM (may be a backward step as the Lightning is such a nice handling and speedy freeride sail!).

Krisiz1
WA, 331 posts
12 Sep 2009 7:54PM
Thumbs Up

Interesting sub-topic emerged on this thread which I interperated as "the depth of your commitment to the sport is measured by how much money you spend on it".

GazMan
WA, 847 posts
12 Sep 2009 10:11PM
Thumbs Up

Krisiz1 said...

Interesting sub-topic emerged on this thread which I interperated as "the depth of your commitment to the sport is measured by how much money you spend on it".


Krisiz1,

Maybe you need to read the following topics (if you haven't already done so!) which appear to echo your interpretation very, very loudly:

How much is too much part 1
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=51558

Classic quote in part 1: HE WHO DIES WITH THE MOST TOYS WINS!

How much is too much part 2
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=54153

As for me, I will probably be sticking with SDM's for now as I don't want to part with my nice twin cam Lightning which more than likely won't work too well on a RDM.

AHeerey
QLD, 12 posts
13 Sep 2009 11:35AM
Thumbs Up

longwinded said...

RDM is witchcraft - smaller diameter for same weight and strength!!! Theres no way this should work!!! Someone please .sort out string theory and quantum gravity so we can answer this question and travel the universe through wormholes.

Plus SDM works fine for me!


To answer you question, it is all about the "moment of inertia". The higher the moment of inertia the better the ability of the mast to handle bending moments (ie horizontal forces from sail, boom etc. The moment of inertia is dependent on the shape of the mast, for example the larger the diameter of the mast the thinner the walls need to be. Moment of Inertia for a slender beam (mast) taking out the fixed variables is proportional to: (outer diameter^2 - inner diameter^2). So if the mast is skinner (ie rdm) the wall thickness must be greatly increased to achieve the same resistance to bending (keep the same stiffness). Which answers the weight part as a RDM has a smaller outer diameter it needs significantly more wall thickness to achieve the same stiffness.

The "strength" is a tad bit more complex, trying to keep its simple I will assume the mast fails in bending, bending stress is depended on the distance of the outside wall of the mast to axis it is bending around. So for a RDM this is a lot less than a SDM, thus at the same bending moment it will be exposed to less stress. Or put another way you have to bend the RDM more than the SDM to acheive the same stress. As both masts are the same material they will break at the same stress. I hope my rambling is understandable i just found it an interesting question I had not thought to hard about before.

Side note

For the Shear and Torsional loading the mast experiences the amount of stress occurred is depended on the cross sectional area of the mast. So a RDM has a greater area and thus again less stress for same deflection. If we all want to get really technical we have to pull Mohr's circle out....

Mark _australia
WA, 23436 posts
13 Sep 2009 10:37AM
Thumbs Up

Pretty much what I said in one line Beebles

AHeerey
QLD, 12 posts
13 Sep 2009 1:23PM
Thumbs Up

Mark _australia said...

Pretty much what I said in one line Beebles


Very true,

GazMan
WA, 847 posts
13 Sep 2009 3:58PM
Thumbs Up

So I've decided to stick with SDM for my NP, KA & Tushie quiver. Choices for new 430 SDM mast (freeride & bump n' jump use only) appears to come down to:

- NP X6 (which I currently use)
- Tushingham Freewave 75% carbon
- KA 75% carbon
- Powerex Wave 60% carbon

Any others to consider?

I'm certain the first three masts mentioned will work ok, but can anyone who has used the Powerex Wave in NP or Tushingham sails comment on bend curve compatibility?

Rubby
65 posts
13 Sep 2009 10:22PM
Thumbs Up

This discussion doesn't interest me much but I thought I'ld let you see this recent quote from Monty Spindler on his Loft Sail forum.
-if you sail on flat water/lakes it could be that you prefer the sdm
-if you are heavy maybe the sdm suits you better
-if your trim is better on the sdm- maybe it suits better
-if you consistantly sail in the low end of the wind range maybe the sdm suits better...

swoosh
QLD, 1928 posts
14 Sep 2009 12:28AM
Thumbs Up

Beeblebrox said...
To answer you question, it is all about the "moment of inertia".

To be exact, its the second moment of inertia/second moment of area.


GazMan
WA, 847 posts
14 Sep 2009 9:41AM
Thumbs Up

Rubby said...

This discussion doesn't interest me much but I thought I'ld let you see this recent quote from Monty Spindler on his Loft Sail forum.
-if you sail on flat water/lakes it could be that you prefer the sdm
-if you are heavy maybe the sdm suits you better
-if your trim is better on the sdm- maybe it suits better
-if you consistantly sail in the low end of the wind range maybe the sdm suits better...


That would indicate that I need an rdm!!! (more to it than that)



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Windsurfing General


"Does anyone still use std dia masts, and why?" started by GazMan