Dramas on return from hobart

AFR subscribers only

I was told today Gunriunner had to motor back out of Eden because of the fires

But why on earth are you sitting there and slinging **** at Dovell when you have no idea what stresses and forces he allowed for? Have YOU see the remains of the boat? NO! Have you seen the keel fabrication drawings? NO! Have you seen the result of an investigation? NO! Have you seen the approval drawings from an outside certifier (which were obtained)? NO!

You are throwing a very grave charge of professional negligence risking lives and you have not got the faintest shred of evidence to back up your claims. There could have been fabrication issues with the keel, perhaps issues with the boat structure, earlier damage, or other causes. For you to decide Dovell got it wrong is very poor form.

You did in fact state that you believed that Andy "forgot" a factor, which is probably professional negligence. If I am "flaming" you by pointing out that you have no evidence for your very serious allegation of professional negligence, then so be it.

Pointing out that you have no evidence for your claim IS responding to those points.

If you don't want to people to be flamed, then don't flame people by saying that you believe someone made a massive professional blunder that endangered lives.

Custom work is just that. Owner has to know that and take on responsibilities of trying to reinvent the wheel.

Sure the engineer has to do a good job however all he/she can do in any sitiuation is theorise the likely outcomes. Unless boat was strenuously tested before sailing, which I think is almost impossible, there is going to be risks.

Custom build a street car into drag car and sometimes the engine will go pop. Performance mods always push the boundaries and shorten the lifespan of the object. Anyone who is in the industry of performance knows this. The owner should know this and I assume was told the risks.

If you chose to mod your boat where lives are at risk and money settles to the bottom of the ocean then suck up the consequences.

Has anybody heard if the boat is still afloat

Regards Don

I am amazed at the amount of speculation and comments that have been made about the failure on the net without the boat being recovered so it would be interesting if it was recovered and a definite answer found

Regards Don

For the tow I would assume that the boat would be righted (during suitably calm seas and winds), the mast removed, the hull pumped out and sandbags of suitable total mass put down below on top of the keel floors to stabilise it and allow the tow. For sure not an easy job and obviously needs planning but salvage operators these days do it well.

Obviously a superb effort by the crew to get into the life raft, and especially by the individual who unsecured the life raft from the upside down hull - thank goodness all crew were saved.

As regards the definite answer the report into the 2002 incident as below obviously makes sobering reading, but the definite answer was clear - fabrication not in accordance with the design.

cdn.revolutionise.com.au/site/t08nujjqfqrjwygn.pdf

So on recovery it is expected that suitable engineering and metallurgical examinations will be completed on the keel bolt secured keel plate and everything else.