Gave the nhp another go yesterday fully powered ony 9m smoke and I actually really enjoyed it. Had an ocean roedeo mako king on test as well and thing is weird but wicked fun. Think I will buy one of them for light wind and wave use. As for the nhp after riding the long it felt very small and although good with all that rocker I felt like perhaps a size bigger would if be better for me. Think I could het away with the fifty 50 and be pretty happy with it so will trade my nhp in.
Would be nice if I could keep the nhp as well but they are just to damn exspensive and the bigger size the better alrounder.
Thanks for your advice.
So which size are you going to get the 139,140,141?
At 95 kgs im really happy on the 140 but allso ride it with boots so maby the 139 if you dont mind loosing that cm of width. You wont feel the extra length either way so just give it a go. I was just thinking of getting the NHP (selling the 666) as well so i dont have to pull the boots off of my 50 fifty or maby i should just get another 50 fifty
so many decisions. Would be easy if nobile only made one good board. oh well at least you dont have to choose a colour with the 50 fifty, they look sick just the way they are.![]()
Not sure mate. Probably the 140 as I like the wider boards. My trax 4 was only 40 wide and didn't plane as well as the wider nhp 09. I think 42 wide works well. The 140 is only 41 wide isn't it? Think that's will be the best out of the three?
Any body tried all three sizes or even two of the fifty 50's in different sizes that could give any feed back?
They arent reall wide but with the corigated bottom you get a lot more surface area going accross. I think you would be happy with the 140, at some stage definatly give some boots a go on the board as well and see how you like it.![]()
Like to give boots ago but they are exspensive. surface to air over here are doing a bit of a deal on the slingshot pb floyds though at the moment so may be. Are those any good? or am i better off going for some lf oes or something?
I changed my board to the fifty 50 today. 140x41. The board is easy to ride. not sure whether i have done the right thing yet though. when the wind picked up on my 12m the board was like a rocket and not sure if it wont run away with me?
Having said that i was using the standard pro pads that came fitted with the board and i dont really think much of them as they dont lock you dowm in the toe area which is how i like to be and prefer the sandle type like cab syncs. Couldn't be bothered to fit them today but will for next time and see how i get on then.
Maybe being locked down more will give me enough control to stop that feeling that the board may run away when the wind creeps up.
Riding toe side was the nicest i have found any board so far i actually managed to go further upwind than i could toe side on any other board i have tried including my fone trax which was real sweet for that, am now thinking that maybe longer length in a board = easier to side riding? Awesome regardless.
Fifty 50 seemed to go upwind just slightly better than the nhp as well although i think you will be hard pressed to find a board that goes upwind much better than the nobile range.
Dont really think it was windy enough for jumping properly today so hard to say whether i think it is easier or had nicer pop than the nhp plus have just chaned my technique.
Still hummimg and ha'ing as to which is the better. Think i need another session in higher winds to decide. Both cracking boards though!!!!
The 50 fifty does feel like it wants to go fast, well it does go fast but tracks really well but stomp the back foot and she will pull up easily.
If yo can get a good deal on some ss pb floyds go for it they are awsome boots, I have them on my 50 fifty and love them, and i have never had a problem with the closed in toe getting sand in it like some people might say.
Boots feel weird the first few times out but you really need to get used to them before you decide if you like them or not, you will definatly hold a better edge when the wind comes up and the pbs are a verry flexy boot so you arent to restricted in landing toe side or tweaking grabs.
If you dont mind to travel, and love riding butter flat watter in most conditions come across to whyalla, should be able to arange a demo for you.![]()
Sounds awesome, i do have to work in SA from time to time, if i haven't all ready tested one out, next time i'm there i will let you know ![]()
Been out my fifty 50 last couple days now and starting to love it. It's very Fast though and can run away with me when using my 12m in powered conditions. Few times have gone too fast and had to go airborne or turn real quick to stop myself running out of control. Not as controlable as the nhp I might add but kind of adds a bit more excitement to the board. Apart from that it rocks. Have got my cabrinah syncs fitted to it now which are a little better than the nobile ones well at least the straps are! The sync foot beds ain't quite as comfy and it's a shame you can't put the sync pads on the nobile footbeds like you can with other makes. Wen will nobile make some decent backless bindings which are getting ever more popular? Hope they do soon.
As for the fifty 50 awesome bit of kit.
There is definitly more rocker in the nhp I think or at least feels that way. Nhp feels slightly more solid when riding and slightly slower board I think but that's probably to do with the extra width?
See if you can get some boots to try out, since i put them on mine ive only changed back to pads once and only rode for a session then put the boots back on. Im hooked on the extra grip, pop speed and power that you get when ridding with boots. You dont seem to worry about the board as much because it just does exactly what you want. I dont think i will be changing back any time soon.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The corrigation in the board is a good way to make the board stiff where you need it and flex where you dont and save a **** load of weight. If you have ever picked one of these boards up you will notice that it seems to flex easily, but compare it to a piece of coricated iron that also flexes easily, but only a little bit you try to bend it past that point and it will just lock up or crease unlike the nobile board that will just hold that ridgid shape. when the board is fully loaded up it holds a fully ridgid shape that has a rocker comparable to a wake board giving maximum pop, and unlike the cabrina and lf boards it is nice to ride has a verry forgiving landing and goes up wind efortlesly powers through chop etc.
Can you still claim your stiff wake style boards can do this. I do agree that there are other good boards for boots but not one that can handle the range of conditions and different ridding styles that the nobile fifty 50 can. You should give one a go, I think you would be verry suprised.
Haha, unlike LF and Cab which aren't nice to ride. Good grief. Yeah what would LF know, they've only been producing wakeboards for like 20 yrs.
There are a number of points I could go on with, like the fact the "corrugations" run the entire length of the board but magically provide stiffness where you need it and flex where you don't. Christ they have made a break through. But I can already see that we will continue with this banter and end up back where we started.
So in conclusion, yes I can claim what you ask.
Enjoy your sheet of fencing iron.
Its a pity ego's play such a big part in this sport...
There are always going to be different brands and choices on the market but why does it have to get to this... what's good for one person, doesn't necessarily mean the other will agree!
It also amazes me how people are experts on a piece of equipment when they haven't even tried it!!!
Remember also that the review as Waxman said is on the 50 Fifty, why not ride it and make a constructive comment...![]()
Yeah, no worries on the mano a mano action. Pistols at sunrise and all that.
But no thanks on the swapping boards, I'll stick to being "an expert on equipment without even trying it."
Fozzy and his ego - out!