Forums > Kitesurfing General

New Augusta Rivermouth

Reply
Created by dylsa > 9 months ago, 18 Aug 2010
dylsa
WA, 22 posts
18 Aug 2010 1:40PM
Thumbs Up

Heads up to anyone heading to Augusta this summer to Kite. The river mouth has been opened a km or so back up at the Colour Patch, where it was about 20 odd years ago.

Might not affect the nice long butter flat runs this year but I'm sure it'll silt up over the coming seasons. hopefully the change has the desired affect of flushing and cleansing the inlet.




andrewm
WA, 243 posts
18 Aug 2010 1:54PM
Thumbs Up

Is this the 'new' rivermouth? did they actually close the natural one

dylsa
WA, 22 posts
18 Aug 2010 2:06PM
Thumbs Up

In answer to your Qu I have no Idea where the original "natural mouth" was

I know it's been dug out in the same place before, possibly back mid 60's/70s by a bunch of farmers before there was and EPA DEP CALM etc etc. the idea being to get more of a tidal flushing to wash out a lot od the silt and algal buildup. I think there is a lot less water running down the river these days as well which isn't helping.

andrewm
WA, 243 posts
18 Aug 2010 2:38PM
Thumbs Up

ok maybe not natural but the current river mouth. When I was there in February the river was open to the ocean about 2-3km up the beach (east?)

lostinlondon
VIC, 1159 posts
18 Aug 2010 6:21PM
Thumbs Up

That's going to be hard work to tack upwind through...

snorton
WA, 87 posts
19 Aug 2010 8:27PM
Thumbs Up

I think what has happened is the natural river mouth has been slowly moving eastwards over the last few years. LGA was concerned that it wasn't flushing as well and causing stagnant water near colour patch ... so bingo lets cut ourselves a fresh one

Hunter S
WA, 516 posts
19 Aug 2010 10:16PM
Thumbs Up

andrewm said...

Is this the 'new' rivermouth? did they actually close the natural one


No. My understanding is that the plan they settled on was to open a new mouth so there now should be two.

Fabe
WA, 38 posts
20 Aug 2010 4:44AM
Thumbs Up

Hope it doesnt ruin it

hammo
WA, 27 posts
20 Aug 2010 9:42AM
Thumbs Up

The original plan was to block up the current river mouth and re cut another one at the colourpatch. This option was going to be too expensive and put the town at risk of flooding. So they've now put the cut in at the colourpatch and kept the other opening.
The real problem lies upriver - the algae blooms are caused by phosphate run off from the farms. Based on previous experience, the cut will not improve water quality of the river.
What the cut has done is removed access to the 2 kms of sand spit and Jays beach, changed the wave at Jays beach and changed the conditions for kitesurfing. Its too early to say how the conditions will be affected. I think the river side of the cut will probably silt up over time.

Zeph
WA, 21 posts
20 Aug 2010 12:21PM
Thumbs Up

Maybe the beach waves might get a bit better??

au_rick
WA, 752 posts
20 Aug 2010 3:21PM
Thumbs Up

I think the longer term plan is to stabilise the "new" cut and put a marina in

Wogboy1
24 posts
20 Aug 2010 3:27PM
Thumbs Up

That looks like some good flat water, someone needs to tell them it would work better if they made it wider.

andrewm
WA, 243 posts
20 Aug 2010 3:31PM
Thumbs Up

we had a similar issue back home where there were water quality issues. There was a mouth up the beach but some farmers dug another opening about 500m away. Few heavy rainfall periods, some big surf and 6 months later the sand spit that created the nice flat water was erroded away.

lancekenny
SA, 402 posts
31 Aug 2010 10:01PM
Thumbs Up

Just finished a great session at Augusta this arvo - fun long waves and plenty of wind!

No new river mouth any more either - going to take a lot of digging to move the sand thats in there at the moment!

IvorWindeas
WA, 110 posts
1 Sep 2010 5:18AM
Thumbs Up


What numpties. Putting in the cut will have absolutely no impact on water quality or fish stocks which is the apparent reason they did it. Simple physics dictates that the river upstream will flow at exactly the same speed, its just that it now has a few hundred metres less distance to go.

Hopefully the cut fills up with sand quickly.

craggers
WA, 475 posts
1 Sep 2010 10:38AM
Thumbs Up

IvorWindeas said...


What numpties. Putting in the cut will have absolutely no impact on water quality or fish stocks which is the apparent reason they did it. Simple physics dictates that the river upstream will flow at exactly the same speed, its just that it now has a few hundred metres less distance to go.

Hopefully the cut fills up with sand quickly.


Tide mate, tide. simple hydrophysics will tell you that they hope the ocean water can get in and out easier... hence 'flushing'.

Refer Mandurah (Dawesville), and the studies conducted there pre/post cut.
http://www.deh.gov.au/coasts/publications/somer/annex2/brodie.html

(bear in mind, i dont necessarily endorse bulldozers assisting nature, its just not as simple as 'simple' anything).

hmmmm thats the very spot i first stood up on a crusty old windsurfer, drifted 30 metres and then swam it back. 50 times. a day. for a week. 18 years ago.



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Kitesurfing General


"New Augusta Rivermouth" started by dylsa