Developments at Dutch

Far from being less dangerous the spot [rosendo st - salved rd] that the council want kiters to use has no sand, or at best about a 5m strip currently, totally inadequate for launching a kite. The same happens every winter. Also low tide will see the reef in front of that section drying out totally at low tide this afternoon, as is always the case on big tides.

People use phone box because it IS the safest lunch site on the stretch and a death at that locality was tragic but chances are that if someone is going to get injured it is most likely to happen where people land and launch.

Seasonal restrictions at phone box would be far more useful if the council really feels there is some sort of conflict with other users, although I have to say if there has been conflict I am unaware of it.

Another classic case of petit bureaucracy legislating for something they cannot understand although apparently decisions were made in consultation with WAKSA, must be guys who never ride there to let that one through.

Yes, you're right - it is a narrower launch area outside of summer. However, the area between the groyne and Rosendo St has a primary dune system that may act a buffer between those on the beach and joe-public up on the footpath. And it's they who have to be considered. At Deane Street there is pretty much sweet fanny adams between the beach and the footpath and road - get lofted, or have to ping your kite on the beach there, and it's pretty much landing on others' heads.
And to be honest, after watching councils and their ratepayers for many years, they've both been actually been quite accommodating this time round.
The coast is getting crowded by all sports - just look at the numbers SUP'ers - because Perth population has grown so much and everyone can afford all sorts of toys for any weather.
A different, quid-pro-quo mindset would now be useful. And the council is spending $70,000-$80,000, after all.

Select to expand quote

EternalNoob said..
when will this be enforced?

There is no 'enforcement' as such right now. The council says it will monitor over 'the season" whether the improvements are enough to take people away from Telephone Box when others - swimmers, kiddies, paddlers, grandmas and families - are using it. So keep well clear during summer/holiday time when all the good folk of Cottesloe, and all the other tribes attracted to the place from across the metro area, are out in force
The council is also doing a review all their local laws relating to beaches, and I suspect any local law preventing launching and landing outside of the zone will be part of that.
The lesson: use your noggin', and if there are families and locals at Telephone Box. go 100m south, rig and launch there.
You're not stopped from being offshore from it, they just DON'T want us not to launch or land on it.

Select to expand quote

Stuthepirate said..
All the changes that are being made we're tabled ages ago. Most of them, opinions we're asked for and the the relevant sporting bodies presented this to the city council.
I think it's actually good that the council asked for opinions or suggestions. It could easily have ended up being a blanket ban on kiters in that area.

don't be silly stu . Without bodies like waksa this would have happened anyway . WAKSA and the likes do nothing except take people's money right ???

Looking very nice. Are the showers in yet or a tap to rinse the sand off. Thanks for the update.

Select to expand quote

alverstone said...
Friday, Sept 16: They opened the new car park this morning.

Have they put a cctv to catch the scumbags that do the rounds knocking your gear off

Select to expand quote

cauncy said..

alverstone said...
Friday, Sept 16: They opened the new car park this morning.

Have they put a cctv to catch the scumbags that do the rounds knocking your gear off

There's is a camera looking out to sea from a pole holding up the sunshade sails at the playground, which I assume is the 'monitoring' of the success of the improvements because it looks like the same ones they used when they did the long-term beach erosion study at North Cott.

CCTV is too expensive because it requires ****loads of $$$ to run afterwards, with monitoring. taping, cataloging, ect. Hence, that's why places like the City of Perth are the only ones who can afford it.

Maintenance and upkeep costs stop many of the things people whinge about, like "why no ocean pools, shark barriers, skate parks? If you cane get the operating maintenance and upkeep costs sorted, then you stand a chance.

I used the car park on Friday - after fighting for space with the old dears sitting, looking at the view with a Thermos of tea ;). I backed the car up, and after the session sat with the boot open with a beverage. You can see your cars very easily from out the back.

Select to expand quote

Dolphins said..
Looking very nice. Are the showers in yet or a tap to rinse the sand off. Thanks for the update.

Nothing personal, but can't help but giggle at the idea that Western Australians, with the water dams down to 30%, or something, needing a tap at every beach location. I just carrying a 4lt container to pour over my head.

For the more dainty among you, (and I've used it myself ), there's a shower 80m south at the Dutch Inn slipway.

But the council said they would put one in near the new carpark, so I assume they are trying to figure out how without blowing the budget.

They were given a bit of advice during the consultation about making the two main paths (one at the new carpark and the other used by the poleys near the playground) wider, and removing the bits shat stick out and catch bridles and masts.

I think that would be a bigger bonus.