Forums > Kitesurfing General

Bow kites and the demise of kite flying skills

Reply
Created by dave...... > 9 months ago, 6 Jan 2008
poor relative
WA, 9105 posts
10 Jan 2008 2:54PM
Thumbs Up

waveslave said...

5 liners are harder to rig.
That extra string is a pain.


I'll do two minutes extra on the beach for piece of mind.
Bridles are a total pain. especially when they get caught round something or snap

Scottyyoung
NSW, 129 posts
10 Jan 2008 5:40PM
Thumbs Up

Drible drible drible ..Most of yous should get back to work and stop sounding like
the TV week gossip section in KBM...

brady
TAS, 454 posts
10 Jan 2008 6:52PM
Thumbs Up

I really wish someone would post a link to top-hat-guy.

Afterall, we've done every other cliche in this post already

Oh - and polesurfers suck. That's got them all now I think

The initial post was along the lines of do bow kites decrease kiting skills. They certainly can make for lazy kiters. The point is, does it matter?

I fly a hybrid now, having kited on C's for 4 years. I'm never going back. In steady winds the C's were great, but in gusty frontal stuff they just couldn't handle it. Maybe the modern C's are better, but I had enough bad experiences that I don't want to try again. And since changing over, I've progressed much faster (but still a chump)

By the way, pole surfers don't suck. Just so I don't get into real trouble.

par
NSW, 44 posts
11 Jan 2008 12:48AM
Thumbs Up

simonmm said...
2. Fly one of your bow kites on a fixed bar. They sit pretty far back in the window and rely heavily on the control system to make the whole thing fly adequately. Most modern Cs have a much better capacity to surge forward in the window under solid edging to spill power.


Can this really be true? Where the edge of the window is for any kite should be related to its lift-to-drag ratio --- the better the lift-to-drag the farther forward the edges of its window. On a C kite the ends of the kite would be contributing drag but zero lift, because of their angle to the wind. Whereas on a flat/bow kite even the ends of kite will be contributing lift. So it's hard to see how C kites can have better lift-to-drag ratios, so you would expect the bow/flat kite to sit at least as far forward on the window.

Regarding the capacity to surge forward, just putting more load on the lines won't change the balance of forces on the kite, so increased line tension won't be the thing that makes the kite surge forward. What makes the kite swing forward is that slowing down the board swings the apparent wind direction around. And what reduces the pull on the kite is is that its apparent wind speed drops. So the aerodynamics properties of the kite should have zero impact on how quickly it can be depowered by edging. Assuming two kites are both pulling with the same force, how quickly their power can be reduced by edging should be purely a function of how quickly the speed of the boards can be slowed down by edging.

bellz
WA, 572 posts
10 Jan 2008 11:31PM
Thumbs Up

umm dnt know if any1 has said this but 90% of pkra riders ride c kites!!!

mytchook
QLD, 561 posts
11 Jan 2008 12:40AM
Thumbs Up

Sorry if this sounds dumb but what is PKRA?


Don't mind I just googled it......... sorry

simonmm
QLD, 200 posts
11 Jan 2008 10:39AM
Thumbs Up

par said...

simonmm said...
2. Fly one of your bow kites on a fixed bar. They sit pretty far back in the window and rely heavily on the control system to make the whole thing fly adequately. Most modern Cs have a much better capacity to surge forward in the window under solid edging to spill power.


Can this really be true? Where the edge of the window is for any kite should be related to its lift-to-drag ratio --- the better the lift-to-drag the farther forward the edges of its window. On a C kite the ends of the kite would be contributing drag but zero lift, because of their angle to the wind. Whereas on a flat/bow kite even the ends of kite will be contributing lift. So it's hard to see how C kites can have better lift-to-drag ratios, so you would expect the bow/flat kite to sit at least as far forward on the window.

Regarding the capacity to surge forward, just putting more load on the lines won't change the balance of forces on the kite, so increased line tension won't be the thing that makes the kite surge forward. What makes the kite swing forward is that slowing down the board swings the apparent wind direction around. And what reduces the pull on the kite is is that its apparent wind speed drops. So the aerodynamics properties of the kite should have zero impact on how quickly it can be depowered by edging. Assuming two kites are both pulling with the same force, how quickly their power can be reduced by edging should be purely a function of how quickly the speed of the boards can be slowed down by edging.



Without being an expert on the theory, I can only speak from practical experience and say that having flown many different kites on fixed and customised bars, there is an absolute world of difference in the ability to depower through edging with different kites. Even in the C kite only realm, some Cs are almost impossible to fly on a fixed bar whilst others perform like a dream. Actually, even different sizes within the same line of kites sometimes have vastly different performance characteristics (eg you may be able to fly one size fixed on really short 10m lines because of its great stability and performance, yet another size in the same line of kites is an absolute dog fixed on any line length).

My speculation would be that it is a combination of increased line tension and slowing the board down forces the kite forwards in the window. Again from experience, it is easy to see the kite surging forward even if you walk straight backwards in to the wind. Alternatively, imagine a model train on a circular track. Attach a string from the caboose to the centire of the circular track. Now pull on the string and the caboose will have to travel forwards or backwards on the track even though the direction of pull is almost perpendicular. A similar principle seems to apply to kites except that given they are designed to fly forwards, they have a propensity to head in this direction. It is just that some kites want to travel further forwards than others. The thing with the bows (and some poorly designed Cs) is that they seem to be much more sensitive to hindenburging or back stalling. From what I have seen, when you use a fixed bar with a bow it is difficult to get the kite to just sit there with minimal pull without hindenburging. When a gust hits, the kites seem to have a greater tendancy to overfly, hence needing to trim them further back in the window. The problem then becomes that they pull more and can sometimes backstall. The best Cs tend to surge forwards to a point then just sit there. Additionally, different kites do travel through the window at very different speeds. To me, at least, it definately feels like the faster kites fly through the window, the more reactive they are to edging (don't really have any theory to back this up, it is just how it feels).

I guess you can ping pong the theory all day, but nothing beats hooking up a bunch of kites to a fixed bar and giving it a go (this obviously applies only to advanced riders who are very competent in tuning and setting up kites). Some would label it a waste of a good windy day, but for the kite nerds out there it may be an interesting excercise (and going back to the origional thread might even improve your flying skills).

par
NSW, 44 posts
11 Jan 2008 12:49PM
Thumbs Up

simonmm said...

Without being an expert on the theory, I can only speak from practical experience and say that having flown many different kites on fixed and customised bars, there is an absolute world of difference in the ability to depower through edging with different kites. Even in the C kite only realm, some Cs are almost impossible to fly on a fixed bar whilst others perform like a dream. Actually, even different sizes within the same line of kites sometimes have vastly different performance characteristics (eg you may be able to fly one size fixed on really short 10m lines because of its great stability and performance, yet another size in the same line of kites is an absolute dog fixed on any line length).

My speculation would be that it is a combination of increased line tension and slowing the board down forces the kite forwards in the window. Again from experience, it is easy to see the kite surging forward even if you walk straight backwards in to the wind. Alternatively, imagine a model train on a circular track. Attach a string from the caboose to the centire of the circular track. Now pull on the string and the caboose will have to travel forwards or backwards on the track even though the direction of pull is almost perpendicular. A similar principle seems to apply to kites except that given they are designed to fly forwards, they have a propensity to head in this direction. It is just that some kites want to travel further forwards than others. The thing with the bows (and some poorly designed Cs) is that they seem to be much more sensitive to hindenburging or back stalling. From what I have seen, when you use a fixed bar with a bow it is difficult to get the kite to just sit there with minimal pull without hindenburging. When a gust hits, the kites seem to have a greater tendancy to overfly, hence needing to trim them further back in the window. The problem then becomes that they pull more and can sometimes backstall. The best Cs tend to surge forwards to a point then just sit there. Additionally, different kites do travel through the window at very different speeds. To me, at least, it definately feels like the faster kites fly through the window, the more reactive they are to edging (don't really have any theory to back this up, it is just how it feels).

I guess you can ping pong the theory all day, but nothing beats hooking up a bunch of kites to a fixed bar and giving it a go (this obviously applies only to advanced riders who are very competent in tuning and setting up kites). Some would label it a waste of a good windy day, but for the kite nerds out there it may be an interesting excercise (and going back to the origional thread might even improve your flying skills).



I'm not an expert on the theory either, or the practice, but just find it interesting to try to understand this.

I don't think your analogy of the circular train track holds. If the direction of pull is truly perpendicular to the track the train won't budge forward or back. And it doesn't matter how hard you pull. Just as tightening spokes doesn't make the wheel spin.

However I think you may be onto something regarding the Hindenburging. Increasing the load on a wing and increasing its angle of attack both make it tend to stall. Slowing your board down does both, and the more abruptly you slow it the more likely the stall. Different wing sections are more or less prone to stalling. But assuming a bow and a C both use the same section it's possible that the C might have an advantage here. On any curved kite the stall will start at the middle of the kite and work outwards because the affective angle of attack is highest at the middle and decreases towards the tips. On a C kite, when the centre starts to stall the tips will still be working because their angle of attack doesn't really change at all. The flatter the kite the more the tips will also start to stall at the same time. It seems reasonable to think that because a C kite maintains a strong vortex around its tips this helps keep the vortex at the centre of the kite from detaching as soon as on a flatter kite.

If this is right, it would explain what a few people on this thread have said: flying a bow without stalling it requires more active attention to the bar pressure and flying a C requires more active attention to controlling the speed of the board with edging.





Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Kitesurfing General


"Bow kites and the demise of kite flying skills" started by dave......