If someone gave you a chessboard and asked you to put one grain of rice on the first square, two grains of rice on the second square, four grains of rice on the third, eight grains on the fourth, and so on, how many grains of rice would end up on the 64th square?
Select to expand quoteVince68 said..
9,223,372,036,854,775,808
You must have read the same article.... or you just a Smarty Pants 
You'd need 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 grains of rice for the 64th square.
That's nine quintillion, two hundred and twenty-three quadrillion, three hundred and seventy-two trillion, thirty-six billion, etc, grains.
And the amount of rice you'd need to cover the entire board - from squares 1 to 64 - would be 18.4 quintillion grains.
That's 923 times the entire estimated global production of rice this financial year.
Select to expand quoteBuster fin said..
Lice? Haven't seen that since the kids were at school.
Craw, not Craw! 
Just pulled out the old Get Smart DVD series for the kids to watch.
To put this in perspective with COVID-19, if you have 1 infected person in the community and the doubling time for infections is 3 days, after 30 days you will have about 1,000 infected people, after 60 days you will have 1,000,000 infected people.
Obviously in the real world the number of uninfected people will be dropping at the same time and eventually the infection rate will plateau, but by that time your hospital system is already overwhelmed. That's why social distancing is so important in order to slow the rate of increase.
Select to expand quotePacey said..
To put this in perspective, old mate at the corona factory gave one to another mate to share and so on, , after 30 days you will have about 1,000 drunk people, after 60 days you will have a huge party
fixed it 
So, we managed to have slowed the spread to a very modest number....only problem now is that in 3, 6, or 9 months we will be in exactly the same position as we are now. Relax the restrictions and it takes up where it left off.
That means 3 courses of action:
1. Relieve restrictions and have a full-blown outbreak
2. Leave restrictions on until vaccine is ready...another year?
3. Eradicate through total isolation measures and mass testing. Possible when the 15-minute test is widely available.
If you choose option 1, you might as well do it right away.
If you choose option 2, really, we want to wait out another year of this? Which takes you back to option 1 or option 3.
When will option 3 be possible....testing tech seems to be advancing quickly.
Select to expand quoteHarrow said..
So, we managed to have slowed the spread to a very modest number....only problem now is that in 3, 6, or 9 months we will be in exactly the same position as we are now. Relax the restrictions and it takes up where it left off.
That means 3 courses of action:
1. Relieve restrictions and have a full-blown outbreak
2. Leave restrictions on until vaccine is ready...another year?
3. Eradicate through total isolation measures and mass testing. Possible when the 15-minute test is widely available.
If you choose option 1, you might as well do it right away.
If you choose option 2, really, we want to wait out another year of this? Which takes you back to option 1 or option 3.
When will option 3 be possible....testing tech seems to be advancing quickly.
4. Maintain restrictions until herd immunity is achieved. That is most of the population gets exposed and everyone who needs it gets the medical attention they need.
Select to expand quoteNotWal said..Harrow said..
So, we managed to have slowed the spread to a very modest number....only problem now is that in 3, 6, or 9 months we will be in exactly the same position as we are now. Relax the restrictions and it takes up where it left off.
That means 3 courses of action:
1. Relieve restrictions and have a full-blown outbreak
2. Leave restrictions on until vaccine is ready...another year?
3. Eradicate through total isolation measures and mass testing. Possible when the 15-minute test is widely available.
If you choose option 1, you might as well do it right away.
If you choose option 2, really, we want to wait out another year of this? Which takes you back to option 1 or option 3.
When will option 3 be possible....testing tech seems to be advancing quickly.
4. Maintain restrictions until herd immunity is achieved. That is most of the population gets exposed and everyone who needs it gets the medical attention they need.
I think that option is the safest health wise, but would take a very long amount of time.
You might be better off dosing up otherwise healthy people, letting them get over it, and then releasing them into the community? It would be faster, but at more risk and cost.
Select to expand quoteNotWal said..
4. Maintain restrictions until herd immunity is achieved. That is most of the population gets exposed and everyone who needs it gets the medical attention they need.
Nope, we don't need a number 4, that's covered by either 1 or 2, achieving herd immunity in a fast or slow fashion, and option 2 is so slow that the vaccine will be ready first.
^ No it's not. The difference is maintaining an ability of the medical crew to remain effective, although that may be concomitant with 2.
Select to expand quoteNotWal said..
^ No it's not. The difference is maintaining an ability of the medical crew to remain effective, although that may be concomitant with 2.
Do the calculations and you'll see that it if you slow things down enough to maintain effective medical treatment, it will take a couple of years to reach herd immunity, so the vaccine will most likely come along first, thus number 2.
Select to expand quoteAusMoz said..
After reading all this, i don't like chess or rice any more
Check Mate 
I was thinking a bit of humor would be fun.
But my bad to think we could avid thread hijack 
Select to expand quoteCraig66 said..AusMoz said..
After reading all this, i don't like chess or rice any more
Check Mate
I was thinking a bit of humor would be fun.
But my bad to think we could avid thread hijack
I think I have read that some question used very recently to explain the growth of Covid19 infections, so you can't really be surprised that that's where its ended up can you?
