Rising seas, removing ships.

I have wondered with the possibility of the sea rising, what a difference removing all the ships would make?
Then a further thought occurred, what if we removed all the fish?
Wonder no further Seabreezers.
Here is the answer.
You're welcome

Ships How much would the sea level fall if every ship were removed all at once from the Earth's waters?-Michael TojeAbout six microns-slightly more than the diameter of a strand of spider silk. Archimedes' principle tells us that the water displaced by a ship weighs as much as the ship itself. If we can figure out the total weight of all the world's ships, we can figure out how much water they're displacing, then divide that volume by the surface area of the ocean to figure out how much the water level would drop.Weighing ships is confusing. There are a bunch of different measurements of the size of a ship, and many of them, like gross tonnage, are actually measures of the volume of the ship's rooms and other internal spaces, not its weight.The UN Conference on Trade and Development publishes estimates of the size of the world shipping fleet.What the UNCTD publishes is "deadweight tonnage", which is the maximum weight of the ship's fuel, cargo, and crew. What we want is "displacement". Unfortunately, comprehensive numbers for displacement are harder to find.Fortunately, we can estimate it. Brian Barrass's book Ship Design and Performance for Masters and Mates gives a table of ratios of deadweight tonnage to displacement for different types of ships.Extrapolating from the last few years of UNCTD data, and using the coefficients from the book, suggests that the world fleet weighs about 2.15 billion tons when fully loaded. The main component of the fleet by weight is oil tankers and bulk ore-carrying ships, which make up over two-thirds of the total. (The UNCTD data doesn't include small recreational boats or naval fleets. However, based on some numbers for naval fleets and recreational boats, neither one contributes much to the total.)A ton of water is about a cubic meter. 2.15 billion cubic meters divided by the surface area of the oceans equals about 6 microns (0.006 mm).But you don't have to worry about that six-micron sea level drop. The oceans are currently rising at about 3.3 millimeters per year due to global warming (through both glacial melting and thermal expansion of seawater).At that rate (normalized for seasonal variation and short-term fluctations), if you removed every ship from the ocean, the water would be back up to its original average level in 16 hours. Sea levels will likely rise a few feet by the year 2100. Current fish wet biomass is about 2 billion tons, so removing them won't make a dent either. (Marine fish biomass dropped by 80% over the last century, which-taking into consideration the growth rate of the world's shipping fleet-leads to an odd conclusion: Sometime in the last few years, we reached a point where there are, by weight, more ships in the ocean than fish.)And what about the old joke about how much deeper the ocean would be without sponges? While estimates of sponge biomass are hard to come by, the answer is probably that if you removed all the sponges, sea level would drop by no more than a few microns ... and much less if you squeezed them out first.

Removing the ICE would make little difference because

Assume we have one cube of ice in a glass of water. The ice displaces some of that water, raising the height of the water by an amount we will callh .Archimedes' principle states that the weight of water displaced will equal the upward buoyancy force provided by that water. In this case,
Weight of water displaced=m water displaced g=ρVg=ρAhg
whereV is volume of water displaced,ρ is density of water,A is the surface area of the glass andg is acceleration due to gravity.Therefore the upward buoyancy force acting on the ice isρAhg .Now the downward weight of ice ism ice g .Now because the ice is neither sinking nor floating, these must balance.
Now when the ice melts, this height difference due to buoyancy goes to 0. But now an additional mass m ice of water has been added to the cup in the form of water. Since mass is conserved, the mass of ice that has melted has been turned into an equivalent mass of water.

Remove the heavy large increasing numbered white pointers and the sea level would decrease by 30%.
Its not global warming that is increasing the sea levels, its the increased numbers of whites. True fact.
Oh,,and the chemtrails that slow the earth's rotation which reduces the gravitation pull = higher sea levels.

And people told me doing chemistry, marine studies and Biology in grade 12 wouldn't teach me anything.

Great post. It's an interesting thing to put into numbers, I know I've wondered similar things.

You could be on to something elbeau, the IMO register has more than 9 million ships on it, not sure how many of those are still displacing water though.

Ok confess, who's been pissing in there wetsuit?

why carnt we just pull the plug out for a while and let a bit out?

Also, we could do our bit by drinking more. Imagine if everyone took a gulp in 1 day, that'd be heaps off the sea level.
And lots of fountains all over the oceans, how good would it look and heaps of water would be up in the air.