I could do that in 5mins w/ Photoshop.
Tell me why would NASA do that when you consider most current NASA workers weren't even born when the moon landings happened.It's not a question of faith that they landed on the moon, it's a fact.
Or is that peoples minds are made up and don't want to be confused by the facts.
I could do that in 5mins w/ Photoshop.
Get a decent telescope and have a look for yourself.
NASA, funded by Coca-Cola, launched a giant popup space disk with a painting of the moon surface including rover etc left behind, during a later shuttle mission. Strategically placed in front of the moon. The mission was called "fixing the Hubble Telescope". So that folk using telescopes on earth would see it.
In 2020 it will be rotated and reveal a giant Coca-Cola logo
From my contacts on the inside
I could do that in 5mins w/ Photoshop.
Get a decent telescope and have a look for yourself.
Will things that have disappeared over the horizon magically come back into view?
Great pity that the Chinese did not land near the Nasa landing sights to end the stupid endless conspiracy theories .
Great pity that the Chinese did not land near the Nasa landing sights to end the stupid endless conspiracy theories .
Landing on the dark side means the "look through a telescope" cant work at all... just saying ![]()
They didn't land near the NASA ones because they also didn't land on the moon... ![]()
![]()
you may not believe this guy...
you may not believe this guy...
HA! First 10 seconds of that... Been there ![]()
Saturn V is HUUUUGE!
And so were the cajones of the flyboys who decided to take a seat where the nuke was in a Redstone ICBM. ![]()
You kinda have to admit , it would be more comfy in some people's minds.
Its like a 24 / 7 high without the hangover .
Saturn V is HUUUUGE!
amen to that. I had seen the F-1 engine up close in Houston. Incredible.
Mythbusters have about as much credibility as dr karl
And people will do absolutely anything for money.... unless you're a politician.... then you'd do absolutely anything so as not to be exposed
Mythbusters have about as much credibility as dr karl
What? Why did not anyone tell me this before? What else have I missed?
But seriously dude - I thought the sarcasm was implicit ....