There rumors that our brave researcher hit a glass roof/ceiling above our Flat Earth/Mike died on impact then fall back on a flat earth.
www.washingtonpost.com/science/2020/02/23/mad-mike-hughes-dead/
Select to expand quoteHarrow said....Why didn't he just charter a light aircraft or helicopter?
Probably because if he was smart enough to do that, he wouldn't be a flat earther?
Never a good thing for anyone to die unnecessarily.
.....hang on....hang on.......
.........
....communique coming in.....
Stealth planes there, shot him down to hide the truth.
Which is don't pack your landing chute in your jet nozzle.
Wonder if he'll rate a Darwin award?
The FAA has confirmed that the rockets were knocked out when it flew through a high density chemtrail.
Select to expand quoteHeisenberg said..
The FAA has confirmed that the rockets were knocked out when it flew through a high density chemtrail.
Heisenberg, in principle are you certain about that? 
Select to expand quoteholy guacamole said..Harrow said....Why didn't he just charter a light aircraft or helicopter?
Probably because if he was smart enough to do that, he wouldn't be a flat earther?
Never a good thing for anyone to die unnecessarily.
.....hang on....hang on.......
.........
....communique coming in.....
we know that Scomo and the Libtards don't believe scientific facts presented. He will need to check with the Oil, gas and coal industry before being allowed to form his own opinion.
You'd HAVE to be a window licker wouldn't you?
Actually on further contemplation he probably went a few steps further 
Apart from a parachute malfunction and death, it looked like a successful flight. RIP 
Select to expand quotejn1 said..
Apart from a parachute malfunction and death, it looked like a successful flight. RIP
Yep, It looks that parachute was deployed just few seconds after firing up,while ascending , then turned off 
rocket science is a risky business...should send monkey or Layke dog on that flight.
One thing I wonder about flat earthers is how come they have not been to sea. For a start, when you're sailing at sea you can clearly see the effect of the curved surface by the way objects can be seen near the horizon; you can see the top of a lighthouse or the upperworks of a ship long before you can see the lower sections of them, and that is only explainable by the curvature of the earth.
But the other thing is that long distance sailing navigators follow "Great Circle" routes, which deviate from the theoretical straight line (as seen on a conventional map) so the vessel follows a shorter distance. For decades, ocean racing yachties have been sailing such routes and comparing logs afterwards, and then publishing the results. They have also often had to report their positions by radio at regular intervals.
If the earth was flat, then boats that went south on the Cape Town to Auckland leg of the Round the World race, for example, would be sailing almost twice as far as the boat that went "straight" according to the flat-earth map. The boats that went south would obviously show far more miles covered on their logs and would finish well behind. But of course, in reality, that doesn't happen. Not only that, the compass courses are of course very different.
So if the flat earthers were right, just about every RTW sailing yachtie would have to be in on some giant conspiracy. The "authorities" would have to have gotten to every single navigator and skipper and most of the crews, from every country, and doctored every log and every race result. And that's not even taking into account fishermen, commercial seamen and the Chinese and Russian navies.
Obviously the flat earth idea is silly, but it's sometimes interesting to consider just how silly it is.
Select to expand quoteChris 249 said..
One thing I wonder about flat earthers is how come they have not been to sea. For a start, when you're sailing at sea you can clearly see the effect of the curved surface by the way objects can be seen near the horizon; you can see the top of a lighthouse or the upperworks of a ship long before you can see the lower sections of them, and that is only explainable by the curvature of the earth.
But the other thing is that long distance sailing navigators follow "Great Circle" routes, which deviate from the theoretical straight line (as seen on a conventional map) so the vessel follows a shorter distance. For decades, ocean racing yachties have been sailing such routes and comparing logs afterwards, and then publishing the results. They have also often had to report their positions by radio at regular intervals.
If the earth was flat, then boats that went south on the Cape Town to Auckland leg of the Round the World race, for example, would be sailing almost twice as far as the boat that went "straight" according to the flat-earth map. The boats that went south would obviously show far more miles covered on their logs and would finish well behind. But of course, in reality, that doesn't happen. Not only that, the compass courses are of course very different.
So if the flat earthers were right, just about every RTW sailing yachtie would have to be in on some giant conspiracy. The "authorities" would have to have gotten to every single navigator and skipper and most of the crews, from every country, and doctored every log and every race result. And that's not even taking into account fishermen, commercial seamen and the Chinese and Russian navies.
Obviously the flat earth idea is silly, but it's sometimes interesting to consider just how silly it is.
You obviously have no idea how stupid they are. No point arguing with them.
